* [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
@ 2010-02-19 5:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2010-02-19 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller,
Paul E. McKenney
Cc: netdev, linux-sctp
[-- Attachment #1: sctp-rcu.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9193 bytes --]
This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
locking wrappers.
In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
now that RCU is used.
Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
macros here.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
--- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:44:42.664390403 -0800
+++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:52:48.004478538 -0800
@@ -206,10 +206,6 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *sctp_bucket_ca
#define sctp_local_bh_enable() local_bh_enable()
#define sctp_spin_lock(lock) spin_lock(lock)
#define sctp_spin_unlock(lock) spin_unlock(lock)
-#define sctp_write_lock(lock) write_lock(lock)
-#define sctp_write_unlock(lock) write_unlock(lock)
-#define sctp_read_lock(lock) read_lock(lock)
-#define sctp_read_unlock(lock) read_unlock(lock)
/* sock lock wrappers. */
#define sctp_lock_sock(sk) lock_sock(sk)
@@ -649,6 +645,9 @@ static inline int sctp_vtag_hashfn(__u16
#define sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, head) \
hlist_for_each_entry(epb, node, head, node)
+#define sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, head) \
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(epb, node, head, node)
+
/* Is a socket of this style? */
#define sctp_style(sk, style) __sctp_style((sk), (SCTP_SOCKET_##style))
static inline int __sctp_style(const struct sock *sk, sctp_socket_type_t style)
--- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:47:29.964390311 -0800
+++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:57:26.792896287 -0800
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct sctp_bind_hashbucket {
/* Used for hashing all associations. */
struct sctp_hashbucket {
- rwlock_t lock;
+ spinlock_t lock;
struct hlist_head chain;
} __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
@@ -1371,6 +1371,8 @@ struct sctp_endpoint {
/* SCTP-AUTH: endpoint shared keys */
struct list_head endpoint_shared_keys;
__u16 active_key_id;
+
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
};
/* Recover the outter endpoint structure. */
--- a/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 09:43:22.868887786 -0800
+++ b/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 10:00:55.807210206 -0800
@@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ void sctp_endpoint_free(struct sctp_endp
}
/* Final destructor for endpoint. */
-static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
+static void sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
- SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
+ struct sctp_endpoint *ep = container_of(rcu, struct sctp_endpoint, rcu);
/* Free up the HMAC transform. */
crypto_free_hash(sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->hmac);
@@ -286,6 +286,13 @@ static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct
}
}
+static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
+{
+ SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
+ call_rcu(&ep->rcu, sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu);
+}
+
+
/* Hold a reference to an endpoint. */
void sctp_endpoint_hold(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
{
@@ -338,8 +345,9 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ep->base.bind_addr.port, rport);
head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
- read_lock(&head->lock);
- sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
if (asoc->ep != ep || rport != asoc->peer.port)
goto next;
@@ -352,7 +360,7 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
next:
asoc = NULL;
}
- read_unlock(&head->lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return asoc;
}
--- a/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 09:51:39.104889498 -0800
+++ b/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 10:02:42.972601804 -0800
@@ -704,9 +704,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_endpoint(struct
epb->hashent = sctp_ep_hashfn(epb->bind_addr.port);
head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
- sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
- hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
- sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
+ sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
+ sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
}
/* Add an endpoint to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
@@ -732,9 +732,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_endpoint(struc
head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
- sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
- __hlist_del(&epb->node);
- sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
+ sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
+ hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
+ sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
}
/* Remove endpoint from the hash. Local BH-safe. */
@@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
hash = sctp_ep_hashfn(ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port));
head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
- read_lock(&head->lock);
- sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
ep = sctp_ep(epb);
if (sctp_endpoint_is_match(ep, laddr))
goto hit;
@@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
hit:
sctp_endpoint_hold(ep);
- read_unlock(&head->lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return ep;
}
@@ -784,9 +784,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_established(stru
head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
- sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
- hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
- sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
+ sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
+ sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
}
/* Add an association to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
@@ -813,9 +813,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_established(st
head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
- sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
- __hlist_del(&epb->node);
- sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
+ sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
+ hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
+ sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
}
/* Remove association from the hash table. Local BH-safe. */
@@ -847,22 +847,23 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_l
*/
hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ntohs(local->v4.sin_port), ntohs(peer->v4.sin_port));
head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
- read_lock(&head->lock);
- sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
transport = sctp_assoc_is_match(asoc, local, peer);
if (transport)
goto hit;
}
- read_unlock(&head->lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return NULL;
hit:
*pt = transport;
sctp_association_hold(asoc);
- read_unlock(&head->lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return asoc;
}
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:42:04.556389428 -0800
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:53:03.360663641 -0800
@@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
goto err_ahash_alloc;
}
for (i = 0; i < sctp_assoc_hashsize; i++) {
- rwlock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].chain);
}
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
goto err_ehash_alloc;
}
for (i = 0; i < sctp_ep_hashsize; i++) {
- rwlock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].chain);
}
--- a/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:03:50.428764115 -0800
+++ b/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:05:09.961659526 -0800
@@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
return -ENOMEM;
head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
- sctp_local_bh_disable();
- read_lock(&head->lock);
- sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
+
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
+ sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
ep = sctp_ep(epb);
sk = epb->sk;
seq_printf(seq, "%8p %8p %-3d %-3d %-4d %-5d %5d %5lu ", ep, sk,
@@ -221,8 +221,7 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs(seq, epb);
seq_printf(seq, "\n");
}
- read_unlock(&head->lock);
- sctp_local_bh_enable();
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
return 0;
}
@@ -312,9 +311,9 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
return -ENOMEM;
head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
- sctp_local_bh_disable();
- read_lock(&head->lock);
- sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
+
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
+ sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
sk = epb->sk;
seq_printf(seq,
@@ -339,8 +338,7 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
assoc->rtx_data_chunks);
seq_printf(seq, "\n");
}
- read_unlock(&head->lock);
- sctp_local_bh_enable();
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
return 0;
}
@@ -425,9 +423,9 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
return -ENOMEM;
head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
- sctp_local_bh_disable();
- read_lock(&head->lock);
- sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
+
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
+ sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
list_for_each_entry(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
transports) {
@@ -475,9 +473,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
seq_printf(seq, "\n");
}
}
-
- read_unlock(&head->lock);
- sctp_local_bh_enable();
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
return 0;
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
2010-02-19 5:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2010-02-19 8:13 ` Eric Dumazet
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-02-19 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller,
Paul E. McKenney, netdev, linux-sctp
Le jeudi 18 février 2010 à 21:55 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> pièce jointe document texte brut (sctp-rcu.patch)
> This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> locking wrappers.
>
> In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> now that RCU is used.
>
> Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
>
> P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> macros here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
Stephen, I read full patch and cannot see how you respect the rcu grace
period at dismantle phase. I am not familiar with SCTP, maybe its
already done ? (before the patch)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
@ 2010-02-19 8:13 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-02-19 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller,
Paul E. McKenney, netdev, linux-sctp
Le jeudi 18 février 2010 à 21:55 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> pièce jointe document texte brut (sctp-rcu.patch)
> This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> locking wrappers.
>
> In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> now that RCU is used.
>
> Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
>
> P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> macros here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
Stephen, I read full patch and cannot see how you respect the rcu grace
period at dismantle phase. I am not familiar with SCTP, maybe its
already done ? (before the patch)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
2010-02-19 8:13 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2010-02-19 8:41 ` Eric Dumazet
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-02-19 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller,
Paul E. McKenney, netdev, linux-sctp
Le vendredi 19 février 2010 à 09:13 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le jeudi 18 février 2010 à 21:55 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> > pièce jointe document texte brut (sctp-rcu.patch)
> > This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> > rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> > locking wrappers.
> >
> > In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> > hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> > and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> > now that RCU is used.
> >
> > Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
> >
> > P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> > macros here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> >
>
> Stephen, I read full patch and cannot see how you respect the rcu grace
> period at dismantle phase. I am not familiar with SCTP, maybe its
> already done ? (before the patch)
>
OOps sorry, I finaly saw the light, please ignore this comment.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
@ 2010-02-19 8:41 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-02-19 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller,
Paul E. McKenney, netdev, linux-sctp
Le vendredi 19 février 2010 à 09:13 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le jeudi 18 février 2010 à 21:55 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> > pièce jointe document texte brut (sctp-rcu.patch)
> > This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> > rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> > locking wrappers.
> >
> > In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> > hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> > and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> > now that RCU is used.
> >
> > Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
> >
> > P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> > macros here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> >
>
> Stephen, I read full patch and cannot see how you respect the rcu grace
> period at dismantle phase. I am not familiar with SCTP, maybe its
> already done ? (before the patch)
>
OOps sorry, I finaly saw the light, please ignore this comment.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
2010-02-19 5:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2010-02-19 15:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-02-19 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, netdev,
linux-sctp
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:55:21PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> locking wrappers.
>
> In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> now that RCU is used.
>
> Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
>
> P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> macros here.
One question below about what looks to be mixing of RCU and RCU-bh
read-side critical sections while waiting only for RCU grace periods.
Unless I am missing something, this can result in memory corruption.
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
>
> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:44:42.664390403 -0800
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:52:48.004478538 -0800
> @@ -206,10 +206,6 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *sctp_bucket_ca
> #define sctp_local_bh_enable() local_bh_enable()
> #define sctp_spin_lock(lock) spin_lock(lock)
> #define sctp_spin_unlock(lock) spin_unlock(lock)
> -#define sctp_write_lock(lock) write_lock(lock)
> -#define sctp_write_unlock(lock) write_unlock(lock)
> -#define sctp_read_lock(lock) read_lock(lock)
> -#define sctp_read_unlock(lock) read_unlock(lock)
>
> /* sock lock wrappers. */
> #define sctp_lock_sock(sk) lock_sock(sk)
> @@ -649,6 +645,9 @@ static inline int sctp_vtag_hashfn(__u16
> #define sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, head) \
> hlist_for_each_entry(epb, node, head, node)
>
> +#define sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, head) \
> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(epb, node, head, node)
> +
> /* Is a socket of this style? */
> #define sctp_style(sk, style) __sctp_style((sk), (SCTP_SOCKET_##style))
> static inline int __sctp_style(const struct sock *sk, sctp_socket_type_t style)
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:47:29.964390311 -0800
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:57:26.792896287 -0800
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct sctp_bind_hashbucket {
>
> /* Used for hashing all associations. */
> struct sctp_hashbucket {
> - rwlock_t lock;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> struct hlist_head chain;
> } __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
>
> @@ -1371,6 +1371,8 @@ struct sctp_endpoint {
> /* SCTP-AUTH: endpoint shared keys */
> struct list_head endpoint_shared_keys;
> __u16 active_key_id;
> +
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> /* Recover the outter endpoint structure. */
> --- a/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 09:43:22.868887786 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 10:00:55.807210206 -0800
> @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ void sctp_endpoint_free(struct sctp_endp
> }
>
> /* Final destructor for endpoint. */
> -static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> +static void sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> {
> - SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
> + struct sctp_endpoint *ep = container_of(rcu, struct sctp_endpoint, rcu);
>
> /* Free up the HMAC transform. */
> crypto_free_hash(sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->hmac);
> @@ -286,6 +286,13 @@ static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct
> }
> }
>
> +static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> +{
> + SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
> + call_rcu(&ep->rcu, sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu);
> +}
> +
> +
> /* Hold a reference to an endpoint. */
> void sctp_endpoint_hold(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> {
> @@ -338,8 +345,9 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
>
> hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ep->base.bind_addr.port, rport);
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> if (asoc->ep != ep || rport != asoc->peer.port)
> goto next;
> @@ -352,7 +360,7 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
> next:
> asoc = NULL;
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return asoc;
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 09:51:39.104889498 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 10:02:42.972601804 -0800
> @@ -704,9 +704,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_endpoint(struct
> epb->hashent = sctp_ep_hashfn(epb->bind_addr.port);
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Add an endpoint to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -732,9 +732,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_endpoint(struc
>
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - __hlist_del(&epb->node);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Remove endpoint from the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
>
> hash = sctp_ep_hashfn(ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port));
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> ep = sctp_ep(epb);
> if (sctp_endpoint_is_match(ep, laddr))
> goto hit;
> @@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
>
> hit:
> sctp_endpoint_hold(ep);
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return ep;
> }
>
> @@ -784,9 +784,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_established(stru
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Add an association to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -813,9 +813,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_established(st
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - __hlist_del(&epb->node);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Remove association from the hash table. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -847,22 +847,23 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_l
> */
> hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ntohs(local->v4.sin_port), ntohs(peer->v4.sin_port));
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> transport = sctp_assoc_is_match(asoc, local, peer);
> if (transport)
> goto hit;
> }
>
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return NULL;
>
> hit:
> *pt = transport;
> sctp_association_hold(asoc);
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return asoc;
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:42:04.556389428 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:53:03.360663641 -0800
> @@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
> goto err_ahash_alloc;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < sctp_assoc_hashsize; i++) {
> - rwlock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].chain);
> }
>
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
> goto err_ehash_alloc;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < sctp_ep_hashsize; i++) {
> - rwlock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].chain);
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:03:50.428764115 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:05:09.961659526 -0800
> @@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
Why _bh() here instead of just rcu_read_lock()? Either way, we would
need a call_rcu_bh() to wait for this particular RCU read-side critical
section -- call_rcu() won't necessarily do it because and RCU grace
period is not guaranteed to wait for RCU-bh read-side critical sections.
If we do need _bh() here, one approach would be to do call_rcu(), and
make the callback do call_rcu_bh(), and the _bh callback could then do
the free. This approach would be guaranteed to wait for both RCU and
RCU-bh read-side critical sections.
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> ep = sctp_ep(epb);
> sk = epb->sk;
> seq_printf(seq, "%8p %8p %-3d %-3d %-4d %-5d %5d %5lu ", ep, sk,
> @@ -221,8 +221,7 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
> sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs(seq, epb);
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -312,9 +311,9 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> sk = epb->sk;
> seq_printf(seq,
> @@ -339,8 +338,7 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
> assoc->rtx_data_chunks);
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -425,9 +423,9 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> list_for_each_entry(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> transports) {
> @@ -475,9 +473,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> }
> -
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
>
>
> --
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
@ 2010-02-19 15:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-02-19 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, netdev,
linux-sctp
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:55:21PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> locking wrappers.
>
> In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> now that RCU is used.
>
> Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
>
> P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> macros here.
One question below about what looks to be mixing of RCU and RCU-bh
read-side critical sections while waiting only for RCU grace periods.
Unless I am missing something, this can result in memory corruption.
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
>
> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:44:42.664390403 -0800
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:52:48.004478538 -0800
> @@ -206,10 +206,6 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *sctp_bucket_ca
> #define sctp_local_bh_enable() local_bh_enable()
> #define sctp_spin_lock(lock) spin_lock(lock)
> #define sctp_spin_unlock(lock) spin_unlock(lock)
> -#define sctp_write_lock(lock) write_lock(lock)
> -#define sctp_write_unlock(lock) write_unlock(lock)
> -#define sctp_read_lock(lock) read_lock(lock)
> -#define sctp_read_unlock(lock) read_unlock(lock)
>
> /* sock lock wrappers. */
> #define sctp_lock_sock(sk) lock_sock(sk)
> @@ -649,6 +645,9 @@ static inline int sctp_vtag_hashfn(__u16
> #define sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, head) \
> hlist_for_each_entry(epb, node, head, node)
>
> +#define sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, head) \
> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(epb, node, head, node)
> +
> /* Is a socket of this style? */
> #define sctp_style(sk, style) __sctp_style((sk), (SCTP_SOCKET_##style))
> static inline int __sctp_style(const struct sock *sk, sctp_socket_type_t style)
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:47:29.964390311 -0800
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:57:26.792896287 -0800
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct sctp_bind_hashbucket {
>
> /* Used for hashing all associations. */
> struct sctp_hashbucket {
> - rwlock_t lock;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> struct hlist_head chain;
> } __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
>
> @@ -1371,6 +1371,8 @@ struct sctp_endpoint {
> /* SCTP-AUTH: endpoint shared keys */
> struct list_head endpoint_shared_keys;
> __u16 active_key_id;
> +
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> /* Recover the outter endpoint structure. */
> --- a/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 09:43:22.868887786 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 10:00:55.807210206 -0800
> @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ void sctp_endpoint_free(struct sctp_endp
> }
>
> /* Final destructor for endpoint. */
> -static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> +static void sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> {
> - SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
> + struct sctp_endpoint *ep = container_of(rcu, struct sctp_endpoint, rcu);
>
> /* Free up the HMAC transform. */
> crypto_free_hash(sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->hmac);
> @@ -286,6 +286,13 @@ static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct
> }
> }
>
> +static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> +{
> + SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
> + call_rcu(&ep->rcu, sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu);
> +}
> +
> +
> /* Hold a reference to an endpoint. */
> void sctp_endpoint_hold(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> {
> @@ -338,8 +345,9 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
>
> hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ep->base.bind_addr.port, rport);
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> if (asoc->ep != ep || rport != asoc->peer.port)
> goto next;
> @@ -352,7 +360,7 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
> next:
> asoc = NULL;
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return asoc;
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 09:51:39.104889498 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 10:02:42.972601804 -0800
> @@ -704,9 +704,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_endpoint(struct
> epb->hashent = sctp_ep_hashfn(epb->bind_addr.port);
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Add an endpoint to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -732,9 +732,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_endpoint(struc
>
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - __hlist_del(&epb->node);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Remove endpoint from the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
>
> hash = sctp_ep_hashfn(ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port));
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> ep = sctp_ep(epb);
> if (sctp_endpoint_is_match(ep, laddr))
> goto hit;
> @@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
>
> hit:
> sctp_endpoint_hold(ep);
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return ep;
> }
>
> @@ -784,9 +784,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_established(stru
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Add an association to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -813,9 +813,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_established(st
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - __hlist_del(&epb->node);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Remove association from the hash table. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -847,22 +847,23 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_l
> */
> hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ntohs(local->v4.sin_port), ntohs(peer->v4.sin_port));
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> transport = sctp_assoc_is_match(asoc, local, peer);
> if (transport)
> goto hit;
> }
>
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return NULL;
>
> hit:
> *pt = transport;
> sctp_association_hold(asoc);
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return asoc;
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:42:04.556389428 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:53:03.360663641 -0800
> @@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
> goto err_ahash_alloc;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < sctp_assoc_hashsize; i++) {
> - rwlock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].chain);
> }
>
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
> goto err_ehash_alloc;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < sctp_ep_hashsize; i++) {
> - rwlock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].chain);
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:03:50.428764115 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:05:09.961659526 -0800
> @@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
Why _bh() here instead of just rcu_read_lock()? Either way, we would
need a call_rcu_bh() to wait for this particular RCU read-side critical
section -- call_rcu() won't necessarily do it because and RCU grace
period is not guaranteed to wait for RCU-bh read-side critical sections.
If we do need _bh() here, one approach would be to do call_rcu(), and
make the callback do call_rcu_bh(), and the _bh callback could then do
the free. This approach would be guaranteed to wait for both RCU and
RCU-bh read-side critical sections.
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> ep = sctp_ep(epb);
> sk = epb->sk;
> seq_printf(seq, "%8p %8p %-3d %-3d %-4d %-5d %5d %5lu ", ep, sk,
> @@ -221,8 +221,7 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
> sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs(seq, epb);
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -312,9 +311,9 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> sk = epb->sk;
> seq_printf(seq,
> @@ -339,8 +338,7 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
> assoc->rtx_data_chunks);
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -425,9 +423,9 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> list_for_each_entry(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> transports) {
> @@ -475,9 +473,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> }
> -
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
>
>
> --
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
2010-02-19 15:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2010-02-19 16:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2010-02-19 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, netdev,
linux-sctp
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:58:25 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:55:21PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> > rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> > locking wrappers.
> >
> > In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> > hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> > and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> > now that RCU is used.
> >
> > Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
> >
> > P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> > macros here.
>
> One question below about what looks to be mixing of RCU and RCU-bh
> read-side critical sections while waiting only for RCU grace periods.
> Unless I am missing something, this can result in memory corruption.
>
Thanks, I copied the original locking which was broken there as well.
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
@ 2010-02-19 16:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2010-02-19 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, netdev,
linux-sctp
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:58:25 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:55:21PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> > rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> > locking wrappers.
> >
> > In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> > hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> > and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> > now that RCU is used.
> >
> > Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
> >
> > P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> > macros here.
>
> One question below about what looks to be mixing of RCU and RCU-bh
> read-side critical sections while waiting only for RCU grace periods.
> Unless I am missing something, this can result in memory corruption.
>
Thanks, I copied the original locking which was broken there as well.
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
2010-02-19 16:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2010-02-19 19:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-02-19 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, netdev,
linux-sctp
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:18:56AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:58:25 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:55:21PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> > > rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> > > locking wrappers.
> > >
> > > In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> > > hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> > > and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> > > now that RCU is used.
> > >
> > > Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
> > >
> > > P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> > > macros here.
> >
> > One question below about what looks to be mixing of RCU and RCU-bh
> > read-side critical sections while waiting only for RCU grace periods.
> > Unless I am missing something, this can result in memory corruption.
>
> Thanks, I copied the original locking which was broken there as well.
I know that feeling! :-)
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
@ 2010-02-19 19:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-02-19 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, netdev,
linux-sctp
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:18:56AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:58:25 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:55:21PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> > > rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> > > locking wrappers.
> > >
> > > In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> > > hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> > > and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> > > now that RCU is used.
> > >
> > > Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
> > >
> > > P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> > > macros here.
> >
> > One question below about what looks to be mixing of RCU and RCU-bh
> > read-side critical sections while waiting only for RCU grace periods.
> > Unless I am missing something, this can result in memory corruption.
>
> Thanks, I copied the original locking which was broken there as well.
I know that feeling! :-)
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
2010-02-19 5:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2010-02-19 17:29 ` Vlad Yasevich
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2010-02-19 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, Paul E. McKenney, netdev,
linux-sctp
Hi Stephen
Som comments below...
> This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> locking wrappers.
>
> In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> now that RCU is used.
>
> Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
>
> P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> macros here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
>
> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:44:42.664390403 -0800
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:52:48.004478538 -0800
> @@ -206,10 +206,6 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *sctp_bucket_ca
> #define sctp_local_bh_enable() local_bh_enable()
> #define sctp_spin_lock(lock) spin_lock(lock)
> #define sctp_spin_unlock(lock) spin_unlock(lock)
> -#define sctp_write_lock(lock) write_lock(lock)
> -#define sctp_write_unlock(lock) write_unlock(lock)
> -#define sctp_read_lock(lock) read_lock(lock)
> -#define sctp_read_unlock(lock) read_unlock(lock)
>
> /* sock lock wrappers. */
> #define sctp_lock_sock(sk) lock_sock(sk)
> @@ -649,6 +645,9 @@ static inline int sctp_vtag_hashfn(__u16
> #define sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, head) \
> hlist_for_each_entry(epb, node, head, node)
>
> +#define sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, head) \
> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(epb, node, head, node)
> +
> /* Is a socket of this style? */
> #define sctp_style(sk, style) __sctp_style((sk), (SCTP_SOCKET_##style))
> static inline int __sctp_style(const struct sock *sk, sctp_socket_type_t style)
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:47:29.964390311 -0800
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:57:26.792896287 -0800
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct sctp_bind_hashbucket {
>
> /* Used for hashing all associations. */
> struct sctp_hashbucket {
> - rwlock_t lock;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> struct hlist_head chain;
> } __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
>
> @@ -1371,6 +1371,8 @@ struct sctp_endpoint {
> /* SCTP-AUTH: endpoint shared keys */
> struct list_head endpoint_shared_keys;
> __u16 active_key_id;
> +
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
I'd recommend putting this into sctp_ep_common structure since that's
what actually gets hashed. That structure is contained with sctp_endpoint
as well as sctp_association.
> /* Recover the outter endpoint structure. */
> --- a/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 09:43:22.868887786 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 10:00:55.807210206 -0800
> @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ void sctp_endpoint_free(struct sctp_endp
> }
>
> /* Final destructor for endpoint. */
> -static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> +static void sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> {
> - SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
> + struct sctp_endpoint *ep = container_of(rcu, struct sctp_endpoint, rcu);
>
> /* Free up the HMAC transform. */
> crypto_free_hash(sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->hmac);
> @@ -286,6 +286,13 @@ static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct
> }
> }
>
> +static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> +{
> + SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
> + call_rcu(&ep->rcu, sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu);
> +}
> +
> +
You will need to do the same thing for sctp_association_free(), since right now
you are using rcu to locate it (replaced the read lock), but the destruction
sequence does not wait for the rcu grace period.
> /* Hold a reference to an endpoint. */
> void sctp_endpoint_hold(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> {
> @@ -338,8 +345,9 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
>
> hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ep->base.bind_addr.port, rport);
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> if (asoc->ep != ep || rport != asoc->peer.port)
> goto next;
> @@ -352,7 +360,7 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
> next:
> asoc = NULL;
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return asoc;
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 09:51:39.104889498 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 10:02:42.972601804 -0800
> @@ -704,9 +704,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_endpoint(struct
> epb->hashent = sctp_ep_hashfn(epb->bind_addr.port);
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Add an endpoint to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -732,9 +732,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_endpoint(struc
>
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - __hlist_del(&epb->node);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Remove endpoint from the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
>
> hash = sctp_ep_hashfn(ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port));
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> ep = sctp_ep(epb);
> if (sctp_endpoint_is_match(ep, laddr))
> goto hit;
> @@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
>
> hit:
> sctp_endpoint_hold(ep);
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return ep;
> }
>
> @@ -784,9 +784,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_established(stru
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Add an association to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -813,9 +813,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_established(st
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - __hlist_del(&epb->node);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Remove association from the hash table. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -847,22 +847,23 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_l
> */
> hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ntohs(local->v4.sin_port), ntohs(peer->v4.sin_port));
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> transport = sctp_assoc_is_match(asoc, local, peer);
> if (transport)
> goto hit;
> }
>
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return NULL;
>
> hit:
> *pt = transport;
> sctp_association_hold(asoc);
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return asoc;
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:42:04.556389428 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:53:03.360663641 -0800
> @@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
> goto err_ahash_alloc;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < sctp_assoc_hashsize; i++) {
> - rwlock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].chain);
> }
>
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
> goto err_ehash_alloc;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < sctp_ep_hashsize; i++) {
> - rwlock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].chain);
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:03:50.428764115 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:05:09.961659526 -0800
> @@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> ep = sctp_ep(epb);
> sk = epb->sk;
> seq_printf(seq, "%8p %8p %-3d %-3d %-4d %-5d %5d %5lu ", ep, sk,
> @@ -221,8 +221,7 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
> sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs(seq, epb);
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -312,9 +311,9 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> sk = epb->sk;
> seq_printf(seq,
> @@ -339,8 +338,7 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
> assoc->rtx_data_chunks);
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
> }
I think you need to do here what was done for TCP, i.e. convert this to
writers and take a spin_lock on the bucket making sure that the chain doesn't
change while we are printing it out.
-vlad
> @@ -425,9 +423,9 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> list_for_each_entry(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> transports) {
> @@ -475,9 +473,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> }
> -
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
>
>
> --
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU
@ 2010-02-19 17:29 ` Vlad Yasevich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2010-02-19 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, Paul E. McKenney, netdev,
linux-sctp
Hi Stephen
Som comments below...
> This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> locking wrappers.
>
> In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> now that RCU is used.
>
> Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
>
> P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> macros here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
>
> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:44:42.664390403 -0800
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h 2010-02-18 09:52:48.004478538 -0800
> @@ -206,10 +206,6 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *sctp_bucket_ca
> #define sctp_local_bh_enable() local_bh_enable()
> #define sctp_spin_lock(lock) spin_lock(lock)
> #define sctp_spin_unlock(lock) spin_unlock(lock)
> -#define sctp_write_lock(lock) write_lock(lock)
> -#define sctp_write_unlock(lock) write_unlock(lock)
> -#define sctp_read_lock(lock) read_lock(lock)
> -#define sctp_read_unlock(lock) read_unlock(lock)
>
> /* sock lock wrappers. */
> #define sctp_lock_sock(sk) lock_sock(sk)
> @@ -649,6 +645,9 @@ static inline int sctp_vtag_hashfn(__u16
> #define sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, head) \
> hlist_for_each_entry(epb, node, head, node)
>
> +#define sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, head) \
> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(epb, node, head, node)
> +
> /* Is a socket of this style? */
> #define sctp_style(sk, style) __sctp_style((sk), (SCTP_SOCKET_##style))
> static inline int __sctp_style(const struct sock *sk, sctp_socket_type_t style)
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:47:29.964390311 -0800
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h 2010-02-18 09:57:26.792896287 -0800
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct sctp_bind_hashbucket {
>
> /* Used for hashing all associations. */
> struct sctp_hashbucket {
> - rwlock_t lock;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> struct hlist_head chain;
> } __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
>
> @@ -1371,6 +1371,8 @@ struct sctp_endpoint {
> /* SCTP-AUTH: endpoint shared keys */
> struct list_head endpoint_shared_keys;
> __u16 active_key_id;
> +
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
I'd recommend putting this into sctp_ep_common structure since that's
what actually gets hashed. That structure is contained with sctp_endpoint
as well as sctp_association.
> /* Recover the outter endpoint structure. */
> --- a/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 09:43:22.868887786 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/endpointola.c 2010-02-18 10:00:55.807210206 -0800
> @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ void sctp_endpoint_free(struct sctp_endp
> }
>
> /* Final destructor for endpoint. */
> -static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> +static void sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> {
> - SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
> + struct sctp_endpoint *ep = container_of(rcu, struct sctp_endpoint, rcu);
>
> /* Free up the HMAC transform. */
> crypto_free_hash(sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->hmac);
> @@ -286,6 +286,13 @@ static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct
> }
> }
>
> +static void sctp_endpoint_destroy(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> +{
> + SCTP_ASSERT(ep->base.dead, "Endpoint is not dead", return);
> + call_rcu(&ep->rcu, sctp_endpoint_destroy_rcu);
> +}
> +
> +
You will need to do the same thing for sctp_association_free(), since right now
you are using rcu to locate it (replaced the read lock), but the destruction
sequence does not wait for the rcu grace period.
> /* Hold a reference to an endpoint. */
> void sctp_endpoint_hold(struct sctp_endpoint *ep)
> {
> @@ -338,8 +345,9 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
>
> hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ep->base.bind_addr.port, rport);
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> if (asoc->ep != ep || rport != asoc->peer.port)
> goto next;
> @@ -352,7 +360,7 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_e
> next:
> asoc = NULL;
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return asoc;
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 09:51:39.104889498 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/input.c 2010-02-18 10:02:42.972601804 -0800
> @@ -704,9 +704,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_endpoint(struct
> epb->hashent = sctp_ep_hashfn(epb->bind_addr.port);
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Add an endpoint to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -732,9 +732,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_endpoint(struc
>
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - __hlist_del(&epb->node);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Remove endpoint from the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
>
> hash = sctp_ep_hashfn(ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port));
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> ep = sctp_ep(epb);
> if (sctp_endpoint_is_match(ep, laddr))
> goto hit;
> @@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint *__sctp_rcv_
>
> hit:
> sctp_endpoint_hold(ep);
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return ep;
> }
>
> @@ -784,9 +784,9 @@ static void __sctp_hash_established(stru
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - hlist_add_head(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&epb->node, &head->chain);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Add an association to the hash. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -813,9 +813,9 @@ static void __sctp_unhash_established(st
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[epb->hashent];
>
> - sctp_write_lock(&head->lock);
> - __hlist_del(&epb->node);
> - sctp_write_unlock(&head->lock);
> + sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> + hlist_del_rcu(&epb->node);
> + sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> }
>
> /* Remove association from the hash table. Local BH-safe. */
> @@ -847,22 +847,23 @@ static struct sctp_association *__sctp_l
> */
> hash = sctp_assoc_hashfn(ntohs(local->v4.sin_port), ntohs(peer->v4.sin_port));
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> asoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> transport = sctp_assoc_is_match(asoc, local, peer);
> if (transport)
> goto hit;
> }
>
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return NULL;
>
> hit:
> *pt = transport;
> sctp_association_hold(asoc);
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return asoc;
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:42:04.556389428 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c 2010-02-18 09:53:03.360663641 -0800
> @@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
> goto err_ahash_alloc;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < sctp_assoc_hashsize; i++) {
> - rwlock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].lock);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_assoc_hashtable[i].chain);
> }
>
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC __init int sctp_init(void)
> goto err_ehash_alloc;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < sctp_ep_hashsize; i++) {
> - rwlock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].lock);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_ep_hashtable[i].chain);
> }
>
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:03:50.428764115 -0800
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c 2010-02-18 10:05:09.961659526 -0800
> @@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_ep_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> ep = sctp_ep(epb);
> sk = epb->sk;
> seq_printf(seq, "%8p %8p %-3d %-3d %-4d %-5d %5d %5lu ", ep, sk,
> @@ -221,8 +221,7 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_
> sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs(seq, epb);
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -312,9 +311,9 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> sk = epb->sk;
> seq_printf(seq,
> @@ -339,8 +338,7 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct s
> assoc->rtx_data_chunks);
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
> }
I think you need to do here what was done for TCP, i.e. convert this to
writers and take a spin_lock on the bucket making sure that the chain doesn't
change while we are printing it out.
-vlad
> @@ -425,9 +423,9 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> head = &sctp_assoc_hashtable[hash];
> - sctp_local_bh_disable();
> - read_lock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> + sctp_for_each_hentry_rcu(epb, node, &head->chain) {
> assoc = sctp_assoc(epb);
> list_for_each_entry(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> transports) {
> @@ -475,9 +473,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> }
> -
> - read_unlock(&head->lock);
> - sctp_local_bh_enable();
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> return 0;
>
>
> --
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread