All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: decrease size of ath9k.ko
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:54:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100304005433.GA8410@tux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267592564.4725.11.camel@mj>

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:02:44PM -0800, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 23:13 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > -		int valid;
> > -		int valid_single_stream;
> > +		u8 valid;
> > +		u8 valid_single_stream;
> 
> You can use bool instead, and that would give the same size saving while
> being even more descriptive.  I think using bool could be safer, as the
> compiler would be able to detect some misuses and the values.
> 
> But I could get even more saving by using bool with the field width:
> 
> bool valid:1;
> bool valid_single_stream:1;
> 
> That would place both variables into one byte.  It may be ineffective
> for speed, but it's more effective for storage.
> 
> In my configuration, I get following sizes:
> 
> original (int):    2792138
> your patch (u8):   2790186
> bool:              2790186
> bool (1 bit):      2789218

Or use flags, and use BIT(1), BIT(2), etc for #defines for each stream mode.
Would save even more.

  Luis

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
	"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: decrease size of ath9k.ko
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:54:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100304005433.GA8410@tux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267592564.4725.11.camel@mj>

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:02:44PM -0800, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 23:13 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > -		int valid;
> > -		int valid_single_stream;
> > +		u8 valid;
> > +		u8 valid_single_stream;
> 
> You can use bool instead, and that would give the same size saving while
> being even more descriptive.  I think using bool could be safer, as the
> compiler would be able to detect some misuses and the values.
> 
> But I could get even more saving by using bool with the field width:
> 
> bool valid:1;
> bool valid_single_stream:1;
> 
> That would place both variables into one byte.  It may be ineffective
> for speed, but it's more effective for storage.
> 
> In my configuration, I get following sizes:
> 
> original (int):    2792138
> your patch (u8):   2790186
> bool:              2790186
> bool (1 bit):      2789218

Or use flags, and use BIT(1), BIT(2), etc for #defines for each stream mode.
Would save even more.

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-04  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-27 16:56 [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: decrease size of ath9k.ko tom.leiming at gmail.com
2010-02-27 16:56 ` tom.leiming
2010-02-27 17:10 ` [ath9k-devel] " Larry Finger
2010-02-27 17:10   ` Larry Finger
2010-02-28  2:52   ` [ath9k-devel] " Ming Lei
2010-02-28  2:52     ` Ming Lei
2010-02-28  3:19     ` [ath9k-devel] " Larry Finger
2010-02-28  3:19       ` Larry Finger
2010-03-01 15:13       ` [ath9k-devel] " Ming Lei
2010-03-01 15:13         ` Ming Lei
2010-03-03  5:02         ` [ath9k-devel] " Pavel Roskin
2010-03-03  5:02           ` Pavel Roskin
2010-03-04  0:54           ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2010-03-04  0:54             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-06 14:47           ` [ath9k-devel] " Ming Lei
2010-03-06 14:47             ` Ming Lei
2010-03-01 12:19     ` [ath9k-devel] " Holger Schurig
2010-03-01 12:19       ` Holger Schurig
2010-03-10 23:52 ` [ath9k-devel] [stable] " Greg KH
2010-03-10 23:52   ` Greg KH
2010-03-11  0:42   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-11  0:42     ` Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100304005433.GA8410@tux \
    --to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.