From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Olly Betts <olly@survex.com>,
martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Subject: Re: Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:37:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100317093704.GA17146@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100317045350.GA2869@laptop>
* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:31:12AM -0700, Ben Gamari wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Recently I started using the Xapian-based notmuch mail client for everyday
> > use. One of the things I was quite surprised by after the switch was the
> > incredible hit in interactive performance that is observed during database
> > updates. Things are particularly bad during runs of 'notmuch new,' which scans
> > the file system looking for new messages and adds them to the database.
> > Specifically, the worst of the performance hit appears to occur when the
> > database is being updated.
> >
> > During these periods, even small chunks of I/O can become minute-long ordeals.
> > It is common for latencytop to show 30 second long latencies for page faults
> > and writing pages. Interactive performance is absolutely abysmal, with other
> > unrelated processes feeling horrible latencies, causing media players,
> > editors, and even terminals to grind to a halt.
> >
> > Despite the system being clearly I/O bound, iostat shows pitiful disk
> > throughput (700kByte/second read, 300 kByte/second write). Certainly this poor
> > performance can, at least to some degree, be attributable to the fact that
> > Xapian uses fdatasync() to ensure data consistency. That being said, it seems
> > like Xapian's page usage causes horrible thrashing, hence the performance hit
> > on unrelated processes.
>
> Where are the unrelated processes waiting? Can you get a sample of several
> backtraces? (/proc/<pid>/stack should do it)
A call-graph profile will show the precise reason for IO latencies, and their
relatively likelihood.
It's really simple to do it with a recent kernel. Firstly, enable
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE=y, CONFIG_EVENT_PROFILE=y:
Kernel performance events and counters (PERF_EVENTS) [Y/?] y
Tracepoint profiling sources (EVENT_PROFILE) [Y/n/?] y
Support for tracing block IO actions (BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE) [N/y/?] y
(boot into this kernel)
Then build perf via:
cd tools/perf/
make -j install
and then capture 10 seconds of the DB workload:
perf record -f -g -a -e block:block_rq_issue -c 1 sleep 10
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.251 MB perf.data (~10977 samples) ]
and look at the call-graph output:
perf report
# Samples: 5
#
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ............... ................. ......
#
80.00% kjournald [kernel.kallsyms] [k] perf_trace_block_rq_issue
|
--- perf_trace_block_rq_issue
scsi_request_fn
|
|--50.00%-- __blk_run_queue
| cfq_insert_request
| elv_insert
| __elv_add_request
| __make_request
| generic_make_request
| submit_bio
| submit_bh
| sync_dirty_buffer
| journal_commit_transaction
| kjournald
| kthread
| kernel_thread_helper
|
--50.00%-- __generic_unplug_device
generic_unplug_device
blk_unplug
blk_backing_dev_unplug
sync_buffer
__wait_on_bit
out_of_line_wait_on_bit
__wait_on_buffer
wait_on_buffer
journal_commit_transaction
kjournald
kthread
kernel_thread_helper
20.00% as [kernel.kallsyms] [k] perf_trace_block_rq_issue
|
--- perf_trace_block_rq_issue
scsi_request_fn
__generic_unplug_device
generic_unplug_device
blk_unplug
blk_backing_dev_unplug
page_cache_async_readahead
generic_file_aio_read
do_sync_read
vfs_read
sys_read
system_call_fastpath
0x39f8ad4930
This (very simple) example had 80% of the IO in kjournald and 20% of it in
'as'. The precise call-paths of IO issues are visible.
For general scheduler context-switch events you can use:
perf record -f -g -a -e context-switches -c 1 sleep 10
see 'perf list' for all events.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-17 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 15:31 Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 1:24 ` tytso
2010-03-17 3:18 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 3:30 ` tytso
2010-03-17 4:31 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-26 3:16 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 4:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-03-26 3:31 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-09 15:21 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-26 3:28 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-23 19:51 ` Jesper Krogh
2010-03-26 3:13 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 1:20 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 1:29 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 3:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-03-28 14:06 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 22:08 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-09 14:56 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-11 15:03 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-11 16:35 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-11 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-11 18:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-11 18:42 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-11 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-11 23:43 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-12 0:22 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14 18:40 ` Ric Wheeler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-23 11:28 Pawel S
2010-03-23 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
2010-03-26 3:35 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-30 10:46 ` Pawel S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100317093704.GA17146@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=bgamari.foss@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madduck@madduck.net \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=olly@survex.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.