From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, npiggin@suse.de,
mingo@elte.hu, Ruald Andreae <ruald.a@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, Olly Betts <olly@survex.com>,
martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Subject: Re: Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:03:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC1E4A4.1070103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bbf401e.a3b9e70a.13f3.4460@mx.google.com>
On 04/09/2010 05:56 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:08:58 +0200, Andi Kleen<andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>
>> Ben Gamari<bgamari.foss@gmail.com> writes:
>> ext4/XFS/JFS/btrfs should be better in this regard
>>
>>
> I am using btrfs, so yes, I was expecting things to be better. Unfortunately,
> the improvement seems to be non-existent under high IO/fsync load.
>
>
btrfs is known to perform poorly under fsync.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-11 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 15:31 Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 1:24 ` tytso
2010-03-17 3:18 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 3:30 ` tytso
2010-03-17 4:31 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-26 3:16 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 4:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-26 3:31 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-09 15:21 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-26 3:28 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-23 19:51 ` Jesper Krogh
2010-03-26 3:13 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 1:20 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 1:29 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 3:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-03-28 14:06 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 22:08 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-09 14:56 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-11 15:03 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-04-11 16:35 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-11 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-11 18:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-11 18:42 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-11 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-11 23:43 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-12 0:22 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14 18:40 ` Ric Wheeler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-23 11:28 Pawel S
2010-03-23 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
2010-03-26 3:35 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-30 10:46 ` Pawel S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC1E4A4.1070103@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bgamari.foss@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madduck@madduck.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=olly@survex.com \
--cc=ruald.a@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.