From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olly Betts <olly@survex.com>,
martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Subject: Re: Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:16:54 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bac2726.017ee70a.188b.1305@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ba05b07.9f15f10a.5ac5.144f@mx.google.com>
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:31:03 -0700 (PDT), Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:30:10 -0400, tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> > .... so did switching to Btrfs solve your latency issues, or are you
> > still having problems?
>
> Still having troubles although I'm now running 2.6.34-rc1 and things seem
> mildly better. I'll try doing a backup tonight and report back.
>
I stand by my assertion that 2.6.34 does seem better in some regards. While
there certainly are still latency issues, it's now less often that heavy I/O
spills over into over processes' interactive performance. That being said,
earlier this evening Tracker and notmuch were both indexing and I saw several
events of tens of seconds of latency.
- Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-26 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 15:31 Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 1:24 ` tytso
2010-03-17 3:18 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 3:30 ` tytso
2010-03-17 4:31 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-26 3:16 ` Ben Gamari [this message]
2010-03-17 4:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-26 3:31 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-09 15:21 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-26 3:28 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-23 19:51 ` Jesper Krogh
2010-03-26 3:13 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 1:20 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 1:29 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 3:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-03-28 14:06 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 22:08 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-09 14:56 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-11 15:03 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-11 16:35 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-11 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-11 18:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-11 18:42 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-11 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-11 23:43 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-12 0:22 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14 18:40 ` Ric Wheeler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-23 11:28 Pawel S
2010-03-23 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
2010-03-26 3:35 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-30 10:46 ` Pawel S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4bac2726.017ee70a.188b.1305@mx.google.com \
--to=bgamari.foss@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madduck@madduck.net \
--cc=olly@survex.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.