From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: error27@gmail.com, marcel@holtmann.org,
andrei.emeltchenko@nokia.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] bluetooth: handle l2cap_create_connless_pdu() errors
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:27:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100426182752.GA23633@vigoh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426.111259.112594696.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi David,
* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> [2010-04-26 11:12:59 -0700]:
> From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>
> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:09:19 -0300
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > * Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> [2010-04-26 13:36:27 +0200]:
> >
> >> l2cap_create_connless_pdu() can sometimes return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) or
> >> ERR_PTR(-EFAULT).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> In v2 I wrote the patch on top of Gustavo Padovon's devel tree
>
> This is the kind of bug that could cause a crash if the path actually
> executes.
>
> Therefore it tires me that that submitter was told to regenerate this
> patch against some devel tree that is -next bound, when in fact this
> is the kind of fix that warrants inclusion right now into net-2.6
My bad here. So I think we should pick the first version of the Dan's patch.
It applies against bluetooth-testing right now and then against net-2.6 too.
Marcel, is that ok to you?
>
> Marcel, please do whatever magic you need to so I can get this into
> Linus's tree as I did the rest of the ERR_PTR() fixes from Dan already.
> No reason to treat Bluetooth special and defer these fixes to -next.
>
> Thanks.
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://padovan.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: error27@gmail.com, marcel@holtmann.org,
andrei.emeltchenko@nokia.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] bluetooth: handle l2cap_create_connless_pdu() errors
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:27:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100426182752.GA23633@vigoh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426.111259.112594696.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi David,
* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> [2010-04-26 11:12:59 -0700]:
> From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>
> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:09:19 -0300
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > * Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> [2010-04-26 13:36:27 +0200]:
> >
> >> l2cap_create_connless_pdu() can sometimes return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) or
> >> ERR_PTR(-EFAULT).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> In v2 I wrote the patch on top of Gustavo Padovon's devel tree
>
> This is the kind of bug that could cause a crash if the path actually
> executes.
>
> Therefore it tires me that that submitter was told to regenerate this
> patch against some devel tree that is -next bound, when in fact this
> is the kind of fix that warrants inclusion right now into net-2.6
My bad here. So I think we should pick the first version of the Dan's patch.
It applies against bluetooth-testing right now and then against net-2.6 too.
Marcel, is that ok to you?
>
> Marcel, please do whatever magic you need to so I can get this into
> Linus's tree as I did the rest of the ERR_PTR() fixes from Dan already.
> No reason to treat Bluetooth special and defer these fixes to -next.
>
> Thanks.
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://padovan.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo-THi1TnShQwVAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
To: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: error27-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
marcel-kz+m5ild9QBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
andrei.emeltchenko-xNZwKgViW5gAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-bluetooth-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] bluetooth: handle l2cap_create_connless_pdu() errors
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:27:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100426182752.GA23633@vigoh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426.111259.112594696.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Hi David,
* David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> [2010-04-26 11:12:59 -0700]:
> From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo-THi1TnShQwVAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:09:19 -0300
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > * Dan Carpenter <error27-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> [2010-04-26 13:36:27 +0200]:
> >
> >> l2cap_create_connless_pdu() can sometimes return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) or
> >> ERR_PTR(-EFAULT).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> ---
> >> In v2 I wrote the patch on top of Gustavo Padovon's devel tree
>
> This is the kind of bug that could cause a crash if the path actually
> executes.
>
> Therefore it tires me that that submitter was told to regenerate this
> patch against some devel tree that is -next bound, when in fact this
> is the kind of fix that warrants inclusion right now into net-2.6
My bad here. So I think we should pick the first version of the Dan's patch.
It applies against bluetooth-testing right now and then against net-2.6 too.
Marcel, is that ok to you?
>
> Marcel, please do whatever magic you need to so I can get this into
> Linus's tree as I did the rest of the ERR_PTR() fixes from Dan already.
> No reason to treat Bluetooth special and defer these fixes to -next.
>
> Thanks.
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://padovan.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-22 9:52 [patch] bluetooth: handle l2cap_create_connless_pdu() errors Dan Carpenter
2010-04-22 9:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-04-22 9:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-04-22 12:33 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-22 12:33 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-22 12:33 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-26 11:36 ` [patch v2] " Dan Carpenter
2010-04-26 11:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-04-26 15:09 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-26 15:09 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-26 18:12 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 18:12 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 18:27 ` Gustavo F. Padovan [this message]
2010-04-26 18:27 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-26 18:27 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-27 2:05 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-04-27 2:05 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-04-27 2:05 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-04-28 0:03 ` David Miller
2010-04-28 0:03 ` David Miller
2010-04-28 0:03 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100426182752.GA23633@vigoh \
--to=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=andrei.emeltchenko@nokia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.