All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: "rain_maker@root-forum.org" <rain_maker@root-forum.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: remove USB-ID 148f:2573 from rt2500usb driver
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 10:58:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503145815.GA24781@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005031624.45409.rain_maker@root-forum.org>

On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:24:45PM +0200, rain_maker@root-forum.org wrote:
> The drivers rt2500usb and rt73usb both contain the usb id 148f:2573 while only 
> the latter is suitable for devices with that id.
> 
> As a consequence, both drivers will be loaded and system log shows messages 
> like "rt2500usb_init_eeprom: Error - Invalid RT chipset detected".
> 
> If you use the above search term, you will find more than 1500 hits with a 
> well known search engine, confirming that rt2500usb is always the wrong 
> driver for devices with usb id 148f:2573 and quite often as a side effect 
> confusion arose about this -non fatal but misleading- error message in the 
> respective bug reports or threads.

I also get more than 100 hits from (probably the same) well-known
search engine for "rt73usb_init_eeprom: Error - Invalid RT chipset
detected".  I'm sure those aren't all for the same USB ID, and perhaps
none of them are.  Then again, not all of the 1500+ that you cite
are for the same USB ID either.

So I'm curious, how can you be sure that 148f:2573 is _always_ wrong
for rt2500usb?  I do acknowledge that the "73" part makes it suspicious...

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-03 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-03 14:24 [PATCH] rt2x00: remove USB-ID 148f:2573 from rt2500usb driver rain_maker
2010-05-03 14:58 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2010-05-03 15:20   ` rain_maker
2010-05-03 15:47     ` John W. Linville
2010-05-03 16:53       ` rain_maker
2010-05-03 15:13 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2010-05-03 15:29   ` Johannes Berg
2010-05-03 15:30     ` Ivo Van Doorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100503145815.GA24781@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rain_maker@root-forum.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.