From: "rain_maker@root-forum.org" <rain_maker@root-forum.org>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: remove USB-ID 148f:2573 from rt2500usb driver
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 18:53:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005031853.56995.rain_maker@root-forum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100503154745.GB24781@tuxdriver.com>
Am Monday 03 May 2010 17:47:46 schrieben Sie:
>
> http://osdir.com/ml/linux-wireless/2009-07/msg00267.html
>
> This seems to be such an example?
Yeah, I also found that one before, but the message about missing firmware
(which is the most common user's error with rt73usb) and lack of feedback
from the person opening the thread if rt2500usb got the device working made
it "inconclusive" to me.
But maybe this is the main reason one finds so many threads about problems
with this device id and rt73usb being the correct driver.
If it works out of the box (no matter which driver), nobody starts a thread,
if it doesn't work, in most cases it's missing firmware and if rt2500usb
works instead of rt73usb, you can't miss that as it does not need
installation of extra firmware.
I CCed Ivo instead of first sending him this mail only personally, because
although I knew he would be the most likely person to know if my idea was
good or bad (which was exactly what happened), I expected that if there
really are a few devices with 148f:2573 needing rt2500usb instead of rt73usb,
the more likely somebody else actually will know about such a (rare)
exception.
Maybe that was not too clever, sorry for this rather useless thread.
Greetings,
Axel K
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-03 14:24 [PATCH] rt2x00: remove USB-ID 148f:2573 from rt2500usb driver rain_maker
2010-05-03 14:58 ` John W. Linville
2010-05-03 15:20 ` rain_maker
2010-05-03 15:47 ` John W. Linville
2010-05-03 16:53 ` rain_maker [this message]
2010-05-03 15:13 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2010-05-03 15:29 ` Johannes Berg
2010-05-03 15:30 ` Ivo Van Doorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201005031853.56995.rain_maker@root-forum.org \
--to=rain_maker@root-forum.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.