From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: question on virtio
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 14:09:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100505110947.GA27872@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi!
I see this in virtio_ring.c:
/* Put entry in available array (but don't update avail->idx *
until they do sync). */
Why is it done this way?
It seems that updating the index straight away would be simpler, while
this might allow the host to specilatively look up the buffer and handle
it, without waiting for the kick.
--
MST
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] question on virtio
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 14:09:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100505110947.GA27872@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi!
I see this in virtio_ring.c:
/* Put entry in available array (but don't update avail->idx *
until they do sync). */
Why is it done this way?
It seems that updating the index straight away would be simpler, while
this might allow the host to specilatively look up the buffer and handle
it, without waiting for the kick.
--
MST
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-05 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-05 11:09 Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2010-05-05 11:09 ` [Qemu-devel] question on virtio Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-05 19:40 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-05 19:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-05-05 20:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-05 20:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-05 20:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-05 19:40 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-06 1:32 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-06 1:32 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rusty Russell
2010-05-06 1:32 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-06 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jamie Lokier
2010-05-06 16:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-06 16:43 ` Jamie Lokier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-05 11:09 Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100505110947.GA27872@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.