From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>,
Gregory Bean <gbean@codeaurora.org>,
Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/25] msm: generalize clock support.
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:37:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100526173753.GD9069@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100525005115.GA7791@huya.qualcomm.com>
On Tue 2010-05-25 00:51:15, David Brown wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
> > > + * met:
> >
> > Is this even GPL compatible?
>
> Um, this is a standard 3-clause BSD license. There are nearly
> 900 existing files in the kernel that have this license on them.
Are you sure? I believe that Dual GPL/BSD is ok, just BSD is not.
pavel@amd:/data/l/linux-good$ less ./include/linux/license.h
#ifndef __LICENSE_H
#define __LICENSE_H
static inline int license_is_gpl_compatible(const char *license)
{
return (strcmp(license, "GPL") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "GPL v2") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "GPL and additional rights") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "Dual BSD/GPL") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "Dual MIT/GPL") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "Dual MPL/GPL") == 0);
}
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/25] msm: generalize clock support.
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:37:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100526173753.GD9069@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100525005115.GA7791@huya.qualcomm.com>
On Tue 2010-05-25 00:51:15, David Brown wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
> > > + * met:
> >
> > Is this even GPL compatible?
>
> Um, this is a standard 3-clause BSD license. There are nearly
> 900 existing files in the kernel that have this license on them.
Are you sure? I believe that Dual GPL/BSD is ok, just BSD is not.
pavel at amd:/data/l/linux-good$ less ./include/linux/license.h
#ifndef __LICENSE_H
#define __LICENSE_H
static inline int license_is_gpl_compatible(const char *license)
{
return (strcmp(license, "GPL") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "GPL v2") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "GPL and additional rights") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "Dual BSD/GPL") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "Dual MIT/GPL") == 0
|| strcmp(license, "Dual MPL/GPL") == 0);
}
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-26 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-12 21:45 [PATCH 05/25] msm: generalize clock support Daniel Walker
2010-05-12 21:45 ` Daniel Walker
2010-05-24 18:55 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-24 18:55 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-24 19:20 ` dwalker
2010-05-24 19:20 ` dwalker at codeaurora.org
2010-05-25 0:51 ` David Brown
2010-05-25 0:51 ` David Brown
2010-05-26 17:37 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2010-05-26 17:37 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-26 18:58 ` David Brown
2010-05-26 18:58 ` David Brown
2010-05-27 15:34 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-27 15:34 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-28 17:56 ` David Brown
2010-05-28 17:56 ` David Brown
2010-05-29 13:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-29 13:51 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100526173753.GD9069@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gbean@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stepanm@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.