From: Jan Pogadl <pogadl.jan@googlemail.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: achiang@hp.com
Subject: [BUG, REGRESSION] ACPI: Set _PDC
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:40:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006170040.24736.pogadl.jan@googlemail.com> (raw)
Hi,
with commit commit 5d554a7bb0643a6151a84319bfeba8270bf5269e (ACPI: processor:
add internal processor_physically_present()) a new function got introduced which
always fails on machines with CONFIG_SMP disabled. Thus _PDC will never be
initialized? set?.
The problem of the processor_physically_present() is, that it calls the
acpi_get_cpuid(...) function which returns on NON-SMP machines always -1.
Note that i don't have any real knowledge what _PDC actualy realy do, all i
gatherd so far is that its for switching C-Stats. I Stumbled across this by
bisecting the problem, that the undervolting patches from
linux-phc.org aren't working anymore with 2.6.34 (2.6.35-rc3). Whereas they
worked fine with 2.6.33 on my Samsung X20 Notebook with a Pentium M precossor.
The acpi-cpufreq is now using System-IO instead of MSR Registers.
Since i don't know what should be the correct behaviour here i can't
provide any patches. But i doub't it's the correct behaviour of
processor_physically_present() to always fail on non-SMP machines.
Deleting the function call, to this new function in early_init_pdc(...),
and i get back the old behaviour.
cheers,
jan
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-16 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-16 22:40 Jan Pogadl [this message]
2010-06-17 3:24 ` [BUG, REGRESSION] ACPI: Set _PDC Alex Chiang
2010-06-17 7:51 ` Jan Pogadl
2010-06-17 7:56 ` Chen Gong
2010-06-17 14:54 ` Alex Chiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201006170040.24736.pogadl.jan@googlemail.com \
--to=pogadl.jan@googlemail.com \
--cc=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.