* Re: [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request
2010-06-30 14:19 [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request Ethan Lawrence
@ 2010-06-30 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-06-30 19:45 ` Jean Delvare
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-06-30 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
I don't have a datasheet, but from looking into the "Open Hardware Monitor" source
it seems that W83667HG and W83667HG-B are identical from a programming perspective.
Only difference is the chip ID, which should be 0xb350 instead of 0xa510.
So you should be able to use the existing driver by setting the force_id module parameter
to 0xa510. If that works, and there are no objections, I can create a patch to auto-detect
the chip.
Guenter
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:19:29AM -0400, Ethan Lawrence wrote:
> Hello,
> It seems my new motherbord has 'Nuvoton W83667HG-B Super IO Sensors' chip which is not supported yet.
> Device wiki says that there is a driver (w83627ehf) for W83667HG<http://www.nuvoton.com.tw/hq/enu/ProductAndSales/ProductLines/ComputerIC/SuperIO/LPCSuperIOforDesktopAndServer/W83667HG.htm> chip and support for W83667HG-B will probably be added to it.
>
> Could you please add support for the new chip?
>
> Previous support requests for this chip:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-November/027193.html
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-February/027842.html
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-May/028545.html
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-June/028710.html
>
>
> Thanks!
> ---
> Ethan
>
> _______________________________________________
> lm-sensors mailing list
> lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request
2010-06-30 14:19 [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request Ethan Lawrence
2010-06-30 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-06-30 19:45 ` Jean Delvare
2010-07-01 3:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-01 6:05 ` Jean Delvare
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-06-30 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Guenter,
Please don't top-post.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:27:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I don't have a datasheet, but from looking into the "Open Hardware Monitor" source
> it seems that W83667HG and W83667HG-B are identical from a programming perspective.
> Only difference is the chip ID, which should be 0xb350 instead of 0xa510.
I have a datasheet, which unfortunately I can't share. I never had the
time to read it, but as far as I know, the monitoring part is
compatible with the -A variant, while the automatic fan speed control
isn't. So a safe approach would be to only enable monitoring and
disabling the fan speed control interface.
> So you should be able to use the existing driver by setting the force_id module parameter
> to 0xa510. If that works, and there are no objections, I can create a patch to auto-detect
> the chip.
>
> Guenter
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:19:29AM -0400, Ethan Lawrence wrote:
> > Hello,
> > It seems my new motherbord has 'Nuvoton W83667HG-B Super IO Sensors' chip which is not supported yet.
> > Device wiki says that there is a driver (w83627ehf) for W83667HG<http://www.nuvoton.com.tw/hq/enu/ProductAndSales/ProductLines/ComputerIC/SuperIO/LPCSuperIOforDesktopAndServer/W83667HG.htm> chip and support for W83667HG-B will probably be added to it.
> >
> > Could you please add support for the new chip?
> >
> > Previous support requests for this chip:
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-November/027193.html
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-February/027842.html
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-May/028545.html
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-June/028710.html
No need to copy and paste the wiki, we can read it directly ;)
I've added your request to the wiki.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request
2010-06-30 14:19 [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request Ethan Lawrence
2010-06-30 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-06-30 19:45 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2010-07-01 3:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-01 6:05 ` Jean Delvare
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-07-01 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:45:33PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Please don't top-post.
>
Sorry
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:27:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > I don't have a datasheet, but from looking into the "Open Hardware Monitor" source
> > it seems that W83667HG and W83667HG-B are identical from a programming perspective.
> > Only difference is the chip ID, which should be 0xb350 instead of 0xa510.
>
> I have a datasheet, which unfortunately I can't share. I never had the
> time to read it, but as far as I know, the monitoring part is
> compatible with the -A variant, while the automatic fan speed control
> isn't. So a safe approach would be to only enable monitoring and
> disabling the fan speed control interface.
>
The folks at Nuvoton are actually quite nice and sent me a copy.
I browsed through it, specifically the fan control section, but I don't see
what might be different to the current implementation. Of course it would help
to have a copy of the W83667HG datasheet to be able to compare .. I'll see
if I can get that one as well.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request
2010-06-30 14:19 [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request Ethan Lawrence
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-01 3:01 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-07-01 6:05 ` Jean Delvare
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-07-01 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:01:25 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:45:33PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > Please don't top-post.
> >
> Sorry
>
> > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:27:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > I don't have a datasheet, but from looking into the "Open Hardware Monitor" source
> > > it seems that W83667HG and W83667HG-B are identical from a programming perspective.
> > > Only difference is the chip ID, which should be 0xb350 instead of 0xa510.
> >
> > I have a datasheet, which unfortunately I can't share. I never had the
> > time to read it, but as far as I know, the monitoring part is
> > compatible with the -A variant, while the automatic fan speed control
> > isn't. So a safe approach would be to only enable monitoring and
> > disabling the fan speed control interface.
> >
> The folks at Nuvoton are actually quite nice and sent me a copy.
> I browsed through it, specifically the fan control section, but I don't see
> what might be different to the current implementation. Of course it would help
> to have a copy of the W83667HG datasheet to be able to compare .. I'll see
> if I can get that one as well.
I can send you an old version of that one, it used to be publicly
available on Nuvoton's web site.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread