All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:52:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100712025247.GA16784@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100712024104.GD25335@dastard>

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:41:04PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding a
> context to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e.  the
> original patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out which
> combination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilst
> retaining the stability of the courrent code....

That approach sounds good to me.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:52:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100712025247.GA16784@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100712024104.GD25335@dastard>

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:41:04PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding a
> context to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e.  the
> original patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out which
> combination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilst
> retaining the stability of the courrent code....

That approach sounds good to me.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:52:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100712025247.GA16784@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100712024104.GD25335@dastard>

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:41:04PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding a
> context to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e.  the
> original patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out which
> combination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilst
> retaining the stability of the courrent code....

That approach sounds good to me.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-12  2:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-25  8:53 [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2 Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] inode: Make unused inode LRU per superblock Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 16:17   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 16:17     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 16:17     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 23:01     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 23:01       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 23:01       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 23:01       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  2:04       ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  2:04         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  2:04         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  2:04         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  4:02         ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:02           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:02           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:02           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:23           ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  4:23             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  4:23             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  4:23             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 20:32   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 20:32     ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 20:32     ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 22:54     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 22:54       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 22:54       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28 10:07       ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-28 10:07         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-28 10:07         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: add context argument to shrinker callback Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 16:41   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 16:41     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 16:41     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 16:41     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 23:12     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 23:12       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 23:12       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 23:12       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  1:53       ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] " Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  1:53         ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  1:53         ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:01         ` Al Viro
2010-05-27  4:01           ` Al Viro
2010-05-27  4:01           ` Al Viro
2010-05-27  6:17           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  6:17             ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  6:17             ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  6:46             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  6:46               ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  6:46               ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  2:19       ` [PATCH 3/5] " Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  2:19         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  2:19         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  2:19         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  4:07         ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:07           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:07           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:24           ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  4:24             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  4:24             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  6:35   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  6:35     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  6:35     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  6:35     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 22:40     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 22:40       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 22:40       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 22:40       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28  5:19       ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-28  5:19         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-28  5:19         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-28  5:19         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-31  6:39         ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-31  6:39           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-31  6:39           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-31  6:39           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-31  7:28           ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-31  7:28             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-31  7:28             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-31  7:28             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 20:32   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 20:32     ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 20:32     ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 23:01     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 23:01       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 23:01       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] superblock: add filesystem shrinker operations Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 20:32   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 20:32     ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 20:32     ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: make use of new shrinker callout Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 16:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2 Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 16:44   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 16:44   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 20:32   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 20:32   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-28  0:30   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28  0:30     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28  0:30     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28  7:42   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-05-28  7:42     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-05-28  7:42     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-05-28  7:42     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-02 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-02 12:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-02 12:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-12  2:41   ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12  2:41     ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12  2:41     ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12  2:52     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-07-12  2:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-12  2:52       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100712025247.GA16784@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.