From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@penguinppc.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:57:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100802185707.GA4527@laped.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimd67rbQ=9fjAzhBNyRfyJD7AnhR3nUc3a+=+y+@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:59:11AM -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias
> <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:56:42AM +0200, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 06:48:24PM -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> >> > The kernel's BSS size is lost by mkimage, which only considers file
> >> > size. As a result, loading other blobs (e.g. device tree, initrd)
> >> > immediately after the kernel location can result in them being zeroed by
> >> > the kernel's BSS initialization code.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@penguinppc.org>
> >> > ---
> >> > hw/loader.c | 7 +++++++
> >> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/hw/loader.c b/hw/loader.c
> >> > index 79a6f95..35bc25a 100644
> >> > --- a/hw/loader.c
> >> > +++ b/hw/loader.c
> >> > @@ -507,6 +507,13 @@ int load_uimage(const char *filename, target_phys_addr_t *ep,
> >> >
> >> > ret = hdr->ih_size;
> >> >
> >> > + /* The kernel's BSS size is lost by mkimage, which only considers file
> >> > + * size. We don't know how big it is, but we do know we can't place
> >> > + * anything immediately after the kernel. The padding seems like it should
> >> > + * be proportional to overall file size, but we also make sure it's at
> >> > + * least 4-byte aligned. */
> >> > + ret += (hdr->ih_size / 16) & ~0x3;
> >>
> >> Maybe it's only me, but it feels a bit akward to push down this kind of
> >> knowledge down the abstraction layers. Does it work for you to have your
> >> caller of load_uimage apply whatever resizing magic needed for your kernel
> >> and arch?
> >
> > Ayway, IMO the conventions of where to pass blobs from the bootloader to the
> > loaded image are an agreement between the bootloader and the loaded code. The
> > formats or mechanisms to load the image should need to be involved that much.
> >
> > For example in this particular case, other archs (e.g, MicroBlaze) might not
> > need any magic. The MicroBlaze linux kernel moves cmdline and device tree blobs
> > into safe areas prior to .bss initialization.
>
> Are you claiming that's the common case? FWIW, PowerPC and ARM don't
> seem to. I wouldn't expect such logic except in reaction to a specific
> bug (i.e. a qemu/firmware loader bug).
I'm not trying to claim it's the common case, but it exists. BTW, qemu-arm
seems to follow a convention to place initrd 8Mb above RAM base, it
doesn't look at the loaded uimage size when deciding where to place
initrd.
> The load_uimage() interface claims to report the size of the kernel it
> loaded. If you argue that it shouldn't try to do that (and indeed you
The way I understand it, it reports the size of what got loaded.
It would be very difficult for load_uimage to figure out what memory
areas are beeing touched prior to .bss init (or the point where the passed
blob is used).
> could argue it's not *possible* to do that accurately), that logic
Right, its very hard for it to guess what memory areas are safe.
> should be completely removed. The current behavior is worse than not
> knowing at all: callers *think* they know, but it's guaranteed to be
> wrong.
>
> Of course, if you do want to remove the size, then callers are left
> with even less information than they had before. In that case, you
I think returning the size of the loaded image has a value, for example
for archs that move away the blobs before touching any memory outside
their image. Bootloaders for those archs can put some blobs right after
the loaded image.
> tell me: where should I hardcode initrd loading?
Not sure, but I'd guess somewhere close to where you are calling
load_uimage from (it wasn't clear to me where that was).
Take a look at how arm does it in hw/arm_boot.c. CRIS doesn't have
uimage support now, but if it had It would probably do whatever magic
was needed in it's dedicated boot loader file, hw/cris-boot.c.
Microblaze has uimage support, look in hw/petalogix_s3adsp1800_mmu.c.
Maybe we should consider adding a ppc-boot.c with boot-loader magics?
Cheers,
Edgar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@penguinppc.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:57:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100802185707.GA4527@laped.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimd67rbQ=9fjAzhBNyRfyJD7AnhR3nUc3a+=+y+@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:59:11AM -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias
> <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:56:42AM +0200, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 06:48:24PM -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> >> > The kernel's BSS size is lost by mkimage, which only considers file
> >> > size. As a result, loading other blobs (e.g. device tree, initrd)
> >> > immediately after the kernel location can result in them being zeroed by
> >> > the kernel's BSS initialization code.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@penguinppc.org>
> >> > ---
> >> > hw/loader.c | 7 +++++++
> >> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/hw/loader.c b/hw/loader.c
> >> > index 79a6f95..35bc25a 100644
> >> > --- a/hw/loader.c
> >> > +++ b/hw/loader.c
> >> > @@ -507,6 +507,13 @@ int load_uimage(const char *filename, target_phys_addr_t *ep,
> >> >
> >> > ret = hdr->ih_size;
> >> >
> >> > + /* The kernel's BSS size is lost by mkimage, which only considers file
> >> > + * size. We don't know how big it is, but we do know we can't place
> >> > + * anything immediately after the kernel. The padding seems like it should
> >> > + * be proportional to overall file size, but we also make sure it's at
> >> > + * least 4-byte aligned. */
> >> > + ret += (hdr->ih_size / 16) & ~0x3;
> >>
> >> Maybe it's only me, but it feels a bit akward to push down this kind of
> >> knowledge down the abstraction layers. Does it work for you to have your
> >> caller of load_uimage apply whatever resizing magic needed for your kernel
> >> and arch?
> >
> > Ayway, IMO the conventions of where to pass blobs from the bootloader to the
> > loaded image are an agreement between the bootloader and the loaded code. The
> > formats or mechanisms to load the image should need to be involved that much.
> >
> > For example in this particular case, other archs (e.g, MicroBlaze) might not
> > need any magic. The MicroBlaze linux kernel moves cmdline and device tree blobs
> > into safe areas prior to .bss initialization.
>
> Are you claiming that's the common case? FWIW, PowerPC and ARM don't
> seem to. I wouldn't expect such logic except in reaction to a specific
> bug (i.e. a qemu/firmware loader bug).
I'm not trying to claim it's the common case, but it exists. BTW, qemu-arm
seems to follow a convention to place initrd 8Mb above RAM base, it
doesn't look at the loaded uimage size when deciding where to place
initrd.
> The load_uimage() interface claims to report the size of the kernel it
> loaded. If you argue that it shouldn't try to do that (and indeed you
The way I understand it, it reports the size of what got loaded.
It would be very difficult for load_uimage to figure out what memory
areas are beeing touched prior to .bss init (or the point where the passed
blob is used).
> could argue it's not *possible* to do that accurately), that logic
Right, its very hard for it to guess what memory areas are safe.
> should be completely removed. The current behavior is worse than not
> knowing at all: callers *think* they know, but it's guaranteed to be
> wrong.
>
> Of course, if you do want to remove the size, then callers are left
> with even less information than they had before. In that case, you
I think returning the size of the loaded image has a value, for example
for archs that move away the blobs before touching any memory outside
their image. Bootloaders for those archs can put some blobs right after
the loaded image.
> tell me: where should I hardcode initrd loading?
Not sure, but I'd guess somewhere close to where you are calling
load_uimage from (it wasn't clear to me where that was).
Take a look at how arm does it in hw/arm_boot.c. CRIS doesn't have
uimage support now, but if it had It would probably do whatever magic
was needed in it's dedicated boot loader file, hw/cris-boot.c.
Microblaze has uimage support, look in hw/petalogix_s3adsp1800_mmu.c.
Maybe we should consider adding a ppc-boot.c with boot-loader magics?
Cheers,
Edgar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-02 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-30 1:48 [PATCH] PPC4xx: don't unregister RAM at reset Hollis Blanchard
2010-07-30 1:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2010-07-30 1:48 ` [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage Hollis Blanchard
2010-07-30 1:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2010-07-30 6:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from malc
2010-07-30 6:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage malc
2010-07-30 22:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from Edgar E. Iglesias
2010-07-30 22:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage Edgar E. Iglesias
2010-08-01 12:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from Edgar E. Iglesias
2010-08-01 12:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage Edgar E. Iglesias
2010-08-02 17:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a Hollis Blanchard
2010-08-02 17:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage Hollis Blanchard
2010-08-02 18:57 ` Edgar E. Iglesias [this message]
2010-08-02 18:57 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2010-08-02 19:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a Hollis Blanchard
2010-08-02 19:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage Hollis Blanchard
2010-08-02 19:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from Edgar E. Iglesias
2010-08-02 19:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage Edgar E. Iglesias
2010-08-02 20:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a Hollis Blanchard
2010-08-02 20:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage Hollis Blanchard
2010-08-03 20:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from Richard Henderson
2010-08-03 20:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] loader: pad kernel size when loaded from a uImage Richard Henderson
2010-08-02 8:41 ` [PATCH] PPC4xx: don't unregister RAM at reset Alexander Graf
2010-08-02 8:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
2010-08-02 19:37 ` Hollis Blanchard
2010-08-02 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2010-08-02 19:41 ` Alexander Graf
2010-08-02 19:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100802185707.GA4527@laped.lan \
--to=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=hollis@penguinppc.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.