All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "linux-
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ext3/ext4: Factor out disk addressability check
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:52:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100813225246.GC19568@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100813204701.GB19568@mail.oracle.com>

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:47:01PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:30:07PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 12-08-10 15:29:49, Joel Becker wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * generic_check_addressable - Check addressability of file system
> > > + * @blocksize_bits:	log of file system block size
> > > + * @num_blocks:		number of blocks in file system
> > > + *
> > > + * Determine whether a file system with @num_blocks blocks (and a
> > > + * block size of 2**@blocksize_bits) is addressable by the sector_t
> > > + * and page cache of the system.  Return 0 if so and -EFBIG otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +int generic_check_addressable(unsigned blocksize_bits, u64 num_blocks)
> > > +{
> > > +	u64 last_fs_block = num_blocks - 1;
> > > +
> > > +	if (unlikely(num_blocks == 0))
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +
> > > +	if ((blocksize_bits < 9) || (blocksize_bits > PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT))
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	if ((last_fs_block >
> > > +	     (sector_t)(~0ULL) >> (blocksize_bits - 9)) ||
> > > +	    (last_fs_block >
> > > +	     (pgoff_t)(~0ULL) >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - blocksize_bits))) {
> >             ^^^ I don't get the pgoff_t check. Shouldn't it rather be
> > (u64)(pgoff_t)(~0ULL) << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - blocksize_bits)?
> > Because on 32-bit arch we are able to address 16TB device, which is for 1KB
> > blocksize 1<<34 blocks. But your math gives 1<<30 blocks...
> 
> 	This code is directly lifted from ext4.  But that said, I am
> starting to think you're right.  1 page == 4 x 1K blocks, rather than 4
> pages == 1 1K block.

	Wouldn't it rather be:

	    ... ||
	    ((last_fs_block >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - blocksize_bits)) >
	     (pgoff_t)(!0ULL))) {

Joel

-- 

"What no boss of a programmer can ever understand is that a programmer
 is working when he's staring out of the window"
	- With apologies to Burton Rascoe

Joel Becker
Consulting Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
	Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.orglinux-
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ext3/ext4: Factor out disk addressability check
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:52:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100813225246.GC19568@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100813204701.GB19568@mail.oracle.com>

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:47:01PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:30:07PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 12-08-10 15:29:49, Joel Becker wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * generic_check_addressable - Check addressability of file system
> > > + * @blocksize_bits:	log of file system block size
> > > + * @num_blocks:		number of blocks in file system
> > > + *
> > > + * Determine whether a file system with @num_blocks blocks (and a
> > > + * block size of 2**@blocksize_bits) is addressable by the sector_t
> > > + * and page cache of the system.  Return 0 if so and -EFBIG otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +int generic_check_addressable(unsigned blocksize_bits, u64 num_blocks)
> > > +{
> > > +	u64 last_fs_block = num_blocks - 1;
> > > +
> > > +	if (unlikely(num_blocks == 0))
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +
> > > +	if ((blocksize_bits < 9) || (blocksize_bits > PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT))
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	if ((last_fs_block >
> > > +	     (sector_t)(~0ULL) >> (blocksize_bits - 9)) ||
> > > +	    (last_fs_block >
> > > +	     (pgoff_t)(~0ULL) >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - blocksize_bits))) {
> >             ^^^ I don't get the pgoff_t check. Shouldn't it rather be
> > (u64)(pgoff_t)(~0ULL) << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - blocksize_bits)?
> > Because on 32-bit arch we are able to address 16TB device, which is for 1KB
> > blocksize 1<<34 blocks. But your math gives 1<<30 blocks...
> 
> 	This code is directly lifted from ext4.  But that said, I am
> starting to think you're right.  1 page == 4 x 1K blocks, rather than 4
> pages == 1 1K block.

	Wouldn't it rather be:

	    ... ||
	    ((last_fs_block >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - blocksize_bits)) >
	     (pgoff_t)(!0ULL))) {

Joel

-- 

"What no boss of a programmer can ever understand is that a programmer
 is working when he's staring out of the window"
	- With apologies to Burton Rascoe

Joel Becker
Consulting Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-13 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-22 22:03 [PATCH 1/3] ext3/ext4: Factor out disk addressability check Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-07-22 22:03 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-07-22 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] JBD2: Allow feature checks before journal recovery Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-07-22 22:04   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-07-22 22:05   ` [PATCH 3/3] OCFS2: Allow huge (> 16 TiB) volumes to mount Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-07-22 22:05     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-12 17:43   ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] JBD2: Allow feature checks before journal recovery Joel Becker
2010-08-12 17:43     ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 23:03     ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 23:03     ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 23:03     ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 23:03       ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 23:03       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2010-08-13  3:39     ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-13  3:39       ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-13  7:17       ` Joel Becker
2010-08-13  7:17         ` Joel Becker
2010-08-13  7:17         ` Joel Becker
2010-08-10 15:15 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ext3/ext4: Factor out disk addressability check Joel Becker
2010-08-10 15:15   ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 17:42 ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 17:42   ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 18:45   ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-12 18:45     ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-12 20:15     ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 20:15       ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 21:32       ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-12 21:32         ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-12 22:29         ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 22:29           ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 23:07           ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-12 23:07             ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-12 23:13             ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 23:13               ` Joel Becker
2010-08-13 16:30           ` Jan Kara
2010-08-13 16:30             ` Jan Kara
2010-08-13 20:47             ` Joel Becker
2010-08-13 20:47               ` Joel Becker
2010-08-13 22:52               ` Joel Becker [this message]
2010-08-13 22:52                 ` Joel Becker
2010-08-16 15:09                 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-16 15:09                   ` Jan Kara
2010-08-15 17:19             ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-15 17:19               ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-16  2:54               ` Joel Becker
2010-08-16  2:54                 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2010-08-16  3:36                 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-16  3:36                   ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-16  9:21                   ` Joel Becker
2010-08-16  9:21                     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2010-08-16 14:44                     ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-16 14:44                     ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-16 14:44                       ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-16 19:13                       ` Joel Becker
2010-08-16 19:13                         ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2010-08-16 19:21                         ` Jan Kara
2010-08-16 19:21                           ` Jan Kara
2010-08-16 20:45                           ` Joel Becker
2010-08-16 20:45                             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2010-08-12 23:03   ` Joel Becker
2010-08-12 23:03     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2010-08-13  3:39   ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-13  3:39     ` Ted Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100813225246.GC19568@mail.oracle.com \
    --to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.