From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:14:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100820141400.GD4636@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
Hi,
what do you think about the patch below?
>From b983695b92b5be58f31c719fada1d3245f7b6768 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:39:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code
Currently is_mem_section_removable checks whether each pageblock from
the given pfn range is of MIGRATE_MOVABLE type or if it is free. If both
are false then the range is considered non removable.
On the other hand, offlining code (more specifically
set_migratetype_isolate) doesn't care whether a page is free and instead
it just checks the migrate type of the page and whether the page's zone
is movable.
This can lead into a situation when a node is marked as removable even
though all pages are neither MIGRATE_MOVABLE nor the zone is
ZONE_MOVABLE.
Also we can mark a node as not removable just because a pageblock is
MIGRATE_RESERVE and not free (and this situation is much more probable).
---
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index a4cfcdc..da20568 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -611,10 +611,10 @@ int is_mem_section_removable(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
type = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
/*
- * A pageblock containing MOVABLE or free pages is considered
- * removable
+ * A pageblock containing MOVABLE or page from movable
+ * zone are considered removable
*/
- if (type != MIGRATE_MOVABLE && !pageblock_free(page))
+ if (type != MIGRATE_MOVABLE && zone_idx(page) != ZONE_MOVABLE)
return 0;
/*
--
1.7.1
--
Michal Hocko
L3 team
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:14:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100820141400.GD4636@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
Hi,
what do you think about the patch below?
next reply other threads:[~2010-08-20 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-20 14:14 Michal Hocko [this message]
2010-08-20 14:14 ` [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code Michal Hocko
2010-08-22 0:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-22 0:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-23 9:22 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-23 9:22 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 14:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-01 1:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-01 1:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-01 12:19 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-01 12:19 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-01 12:41 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-01 12:41 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 5:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 5:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 9:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 9:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 9:24 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 9:24 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 11:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 11:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 14:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 14:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 14:39 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 14:39 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 3:10 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/2][BUGFIX] fix next active pageblock calculation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 9:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 10:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 10:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 11:01 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 11:01 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code v3 Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 11:42 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-04 2:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-04 2:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-06 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-06 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:15 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 9:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 7:54 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 7:54 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 7:57 ` [PATCH 3/2][BUGFIX] fix memory isolation notifier return value check KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 7:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 22:05 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-03 22:05 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100820141400.GD4636@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=haicheng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.