From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:41:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901124138.GD6663@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901121951.GC6663@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
On Wed 01-09-10 14:19:51, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 31-08-10 22:19:42, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 05:22:46PM +0800, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sun 22-08-10 08:42:32, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > It helps to explain in changelog/code
> > > >
> > > > - in what situation a ZONE_MOVABLE will contain !MIGRATE_MOVABLE
> > > > pages?
> > >
> > > page can be MIGRATE_RESERVE IIUC.
> >
> > Yup, it may also be set to MIGRATE_ISOLATE by soft_offline_page().
>
> Doesn't it make sense to check for !MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE then?
Something like the following patch.
>From de85f1aa42115678d3340f0448cd798577036496 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:39:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code
Currently is_mem_section_removable checks whether each pageblock from
the given pfn range is of MIGRATE_MOVABLE type or if it is free. If both
are false then the range is considered non removable.
On the other hand, offlining code (more specifically
set_migratetype_isolate) doesn't care whether a page is free and instead
it just checks the migrate type of the page and whether the page's zone
is movable.
This can lead into a situation when we can mark a node as not removable
just because a pageblock is MIGRATE_RESERVE and it is not free.
Let's make a common helper is_page_removable which unifies both tests
at one place. Also let's check for MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE rather than all
possible MIGRATEable types.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 19 +------------------
mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +----
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 6e6e626..7aaa272 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -669,6 +669,32 @@ unsigned long __init node_memmap_size_bytes(int, unsigned long, unsigned long);
*/
#define zone_idx(zone) ((zone) - (zone)->zone_pgdat->node_zones)
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
+/*
+ * A free page on the buddy free lists (not the per-cpu lists) has PageBuddy
+ * set and the size of the free page is given by page_order(). Using this,
+ * the function determines if the pageblock contains only free pages.
+ * Due to buddy contraints, a free page at least the size of a pageblock will
+ * be located at the start of the pageblock
+ */
+static inline int pageblock_free(struct page *page)
+{
+ return PageBuddy(page) && page_order(page) >= pageblock_order;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A free pageblock or the one which is movable or reclaimable is
+ * considered to be removable
+ */
+static inline bool is_page_removable(struct page *page)
+{
+ return get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE
+ || pageblock_free(page);
+}
+#else
+#define is_page_removable(p) 0
+#endif
+
static inline int populated_zone(struct zone *zone)
{
return (!!zone->present_pages);
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index a4cfcdc..66195b8 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -569,17 +569,6 @@ out:
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_memory);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
-/*
- * A free page on the buddy free lists (not the per-cpu lists) has PageBuddy
- * set and the size of the free page is given by page_order(). Using this,
- * the function determines if the pageblock contains only free pages.
- * Due to buddy contraints, a free page at least the size of a pageblock will
- * be located at the start of the pageblock
- */
-static inline int pageblock_free(struct page *page)
-{
- return PageBuddy(page) && page_order(page) >= pageblock_order;
-}
/* Return the start of the next active pageblock after a given page */
static struct page *next_active_pageblock(struct page *page)
@@ -608,13 +597,7 @@ int is_mem_section_removable(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
/* Check the starting page of each pageblock within the range */
for (; page < end_page; page = next_active_pageblock(page)) {
- type = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
-
- /*
- * A pageblock containing MOVABLE or free pages is considered
- * removable
- */
- if (type != MIGRATE_MOVABLE && !pageblock_free(page))
+ if (!is_page_removable(page))
return 0;
/*
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index a9649f4..c2e2576 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5277,14 +5277,11 @@ int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page)
struct memory_isolate_notify arg;
int notifier_ret;
int ret = -EBUSY;
- int zone_idx;
zone = page_zone(page);
- zone_idx = zone_idx(zone);
spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
- if (get_pageblock_migratetype(page) == MIGRATE_MOVABLE ||
- zone_idx == ZONE_MOVABLE) {
+ if (is_page_removable(page)) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
--
1.7.1
--
Michal Hocko
L3 team
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:41:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901124138.GD6663@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901121951.GC6663@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
On Wed 01-09-10 14:19:51, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 31-08-10 22:19:42, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 05:22:46PM +0800, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sun 22-08-10 08:42:32, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > It helps to explain in changelog/code
> > > >
> > > > - in what situation a ZONE_MOVABLE will contain !MIGRATE_MOVABLE
> > > > pages?
> > >
> > > page can be MIGRATE_RESERVE IIUC.
> >
> > Yup, it may also be set to MIGRATE_ISOLATE by soft_offline_page().
>
> Doesn't it make sense to check for !MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE then?
Something like the following patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-20 14:14 [PATCH] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code Michal Hocko
2010-08-20 14:14 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-22 0:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-22 0:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-23 9:22 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-23 9:22 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2010-08-31 14:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-31 14:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-01 1:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-01 1:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-01 12:19 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-01 12:19 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-01 12:41 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2010-09-01 12:41 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 5:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 5:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 9:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 9:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-02 9:24 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 9:24 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 11:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 11:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 14:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 14:19 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-02 14:39 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 14:39 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-02 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 3:10 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/2][BUGFIX] fix next active pageblock calculation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 3:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 9:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 10:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 10:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 11:01 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 11:01 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code v3 Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 11:42 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-04 2:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-04 2:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-09-06 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-06 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more conformable with offlining code Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:15 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 9:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 9:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 7:54 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 7:54 ` Michal Hocko
2010-09-03 7:57 ` [PATCH 3/2][BUGFIX] fix memory isolation notifier return value check KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 7:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-09-03 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-03 22:05 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2010-09-03 22:05 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100901124138.GD6663@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=haicheng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.