All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Wan, Huaxu" <huaxu.wan@intel.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:02:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100821120250.1a992b7d@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100819205120.GA22602@linux-os.sc.intel.com>

One more thing...

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:51:20 -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> The pkgtemp reports thermal status for a set of sensors in a package. Please
> note the sensors in a package are not limited to processor sensors which are
> handled by coretemp. The sensors in a package also include gfx sensors, cache
> sensors, memory controllor sensors which are not handled by any hwmon drivers.

By "package" you mean CPU package, right? So by "gfx sensors" and
"memory controllor sensors", you refer to features possibly embedded
into the CPU package, not sensors outside the CPU, right?

> OS gets maximum package thermal status only from MSR PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS.
> There is no detailed thermal info for each sensor in a package. User-space
> can't compute a maximum by itself. So a piece of kernel driver code, whether
> a seperate driver or a integrated driver, is necessary if user-space wants to
> know thermal status of a package.

OK, now I understand, thanks for the clarification.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Wan, Huaxu" <huaxu.wan@intel.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:02:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100821120250.1a992b7d@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100819205120.GA22602@linux-os.sc.intel.com>

One more thing...

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:51:20 -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> The pkgtemp reports thermal status for a set of sensors in a package. Please
> note the sensors in a package are not limited to processor sensors which are
> handled by coretemp. The sensors in a package also include gfx sensors, cache
> sensors, memory controllor sensors which are not handled by any hwmon drivers.

By "package" you mean CPU package, right? So by "gfx sensors" and
"memory controllor sensors", you refer to features possibly embedded
into the CPU package, not sensors outside the CPU, right?

> OS gets maximum package thermal status only from MSR PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS.
> There is no detailed thermal info for each sensor in a package. User-space
> can't compute a maximum by itself. So a piece of kernel driver code, whether
> a seperate driver or a integrated driver, is necessary if user-space wants to
> know thermal status of a package.

OK, now I understand, thanks for the clarification.

-- 
Jean Delvare

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-21 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <94E56C79ECC49A4B87113985F1FEBA8D03F8AE2A4B@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com>
     [not found] ` <4C485DF1.5050407@linux.intel.com>
2010-07-22 16:21   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:21     ` [PATCH 1/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: feature enabling Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:21   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:21     ` [PATCH 2/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp hwmon driver Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22     ` [PATCH 3/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: thermal throttling Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 4/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22     ` [PATCH 4/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: power limit notification Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22     ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 17:27     ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Guenter Roeck
2010-07-22 17:27       ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Guenter Roeck
2010-07-22 17:52       ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 17:52         ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 18:58         ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Guenter Roeck
2010-07-22 18:58           ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Guenter Roeck
2010-07-22 21:21           ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 21:21             ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-08-19 15:46             ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Jean Delvare
2010-08-19 15:46               ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Jean Delvare
2010-08-19 16:27               ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Guenter Roeck
2010-08-19 16:27                 ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Guenter Roeck
2010-08-19 20:51                 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Fenghua Yu
2010-08-19 20:51                   ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-08-19 21:06                   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Guenter Roeck
2010-08-19 21:06                     ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Guenter Roeck
2010-08-20  8:33                   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Jean Delvare
2010-08-20  8:33                     ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Jean Delvare
2010-08-20 16:58                     ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Fenghua Yu
2010-08-20 16:58                       ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-08-20 18:39                     ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-20 18:39                       ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-21 10:02                   ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2010-08-21 10:02                     ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100821120250.1a992b7d@hyperion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=huaxu.wan@intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.