All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Wan, Huaxu" <huaxu.wan@intel.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:39:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6ECBEE.5000301@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100820103356.01c9907f@hyperion.delvare>

On 08/20/2010 01:33 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> 
> Side question: is it safe to assume a maximum of 2 siblings per core on
> Intel x86 CPUs?
> 

That is true for all current CPUs, but is not guaranteed for the future.

	-hpa

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Wan, Huaxu" <huaxu.wan@intel.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:39:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6ECBEE.5000301@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100820103356.01c9907f@hyperion.delvare>

On 08/20/2010 01:33 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> 
> Side question: is it safe to assume a maximum of 2 siblings per core on
> Intel x86 CPUs?
> 

That is true for all current CPUs, but is not guaranteed for the future.

	-hpa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-20 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <94E56C79ECC49A4B87113985F1FEBA8D03F8AE2A4B@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com>
     [not found] ` <4C485DF1.5050407@linux.intel.com>
2010-07-22 16:21   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:21     ` [PATCH 1/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: feature enabling Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:21   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:21     ` [PATCH 2/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp hwmon driver Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22     ` [PATCH 3/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: thermal throttling Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 4/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22     ` [PATCH 4/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: power limit notification Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 16:22     ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 17:27     ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Guenter Roeck
2010-07-22 17:27       ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Guenter Roeck
2010-07-22 17:52       ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 17:52         ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 18:58         ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Guenter Roeck
2010-07-22 18:58           ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Guenter Roeck
2010-07-22 21:21           ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Fenghua Yu
2010-07-22 21:21             ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-08-19 15:46             ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Jean Delvare
2010-08-19 15:46               ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Jean Delvare
2010-08-19 16:27               ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Guenter Roeck
2010-08-19 16:27                 ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Guenter Roeck
2010-08-19 20:51                 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Fenghua Yu
2010-08-19 20:51                   ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-08-19 21:06                   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Guenter Roeck
2010-08-19 21:06                     ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Guenter Roeck
2010-08-20  8:33                   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Jean Delvare
2010-08-20  8:33                     ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Jean Delvare
2010-08-20 16:58                     ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Fenghua Yu
2010-08-20 16:58                       ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Fenghua Yu
2010-08-20 18:39                     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-08-20 18:39                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-21 10:02                   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Jean Delvare
2010-08-21 10:02                     ` [PATCH 5/5] Package Level Thermal Control and Power Limit Notification: pkgtemp doc Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C6ECBEE.5000301@linux.intel.com \
    --to=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
    --cc=huaxu.wan@intel.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.