* [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] lm75: some optimisations
@ 2010-09-09 13:20 Shubhrajyoti D
2010-09-09 14:05 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shubhrajyoti D @ 2010-09-09 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Functions that used only at probe may be optimised.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
---
drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
index ab5b87a..7857b94 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group lm75_group = {
/* device probe and removal */
-static int
+static int __devinit
lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
{
struct lm75_data *data;
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ exit_free:
return status;
}
-static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+static int __devexit lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] lm75: some optimisations
2010-09-09 13:20 [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] lm75: some optimisations Shubhrajyoti D
@ 2010-09-09 14:05 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-09-09 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:08:14AM -0400, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> Functions that used only at probe may be optimised.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> index ab5b87a..7857b94 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group lm75_group = {
>
> /* device probe and removal */
>
> -static int
> +static int __devinit
> lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> struct lm75_data *data;
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ exit_free:
> return status;
> }
>
> -static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +static int __devexit lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>
Other drivers reference the exit function using __devexit_p():
lm78.c:static int __devexit lm78_isa_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
lm78.c: .remove = __devexit_p(lm78_isa_remove),
You might want to do the same.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-09 14:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-09 13:20 [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] lm75: some optimisations Shubhrajyoti D
2010-09-09 14:05 ` Guenter Roeck
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.