All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] lm75: some optimisations
@ 2010-09-09 13:20 Shubhrajyoti D
  2010-09-09 14:05 ` Guenter Roeck
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shubhrajyoti D @ 2010-09-09 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Functions that used only at probe may be optimised.

Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
---
 drivers/hwmon/lm75.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
index ab5b87a..7857b94 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group lm75_group = {
 
 /* device probe and removal */
 
-static int
+static int __devinit
 lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 {
 	struct lm75_data *data;
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ exit_free:
 	return status;
 }
 
-static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+static int __devexit lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 
-- 
1.7.0.4


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] lm75: some optimisations
  2010-09-09 13:20 [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] lm75: some optimisations Shubhrajyoti D
@ 2010-09-09 14:05 ` Guenter Roeck
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-09-09 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:08:14AM -0400, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> Functions that used only at probe may be optimised.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/lm75.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> index ab5b87a..7857b94 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group lm75_group = {
>  
>  /* device probe and removal */
>  
> -static int
> +static int __devinit
>  lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  {
>  	struct lm75_data *data;
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ exit_free:
>  	return status;
>  }
>  
> -static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +static int __devexit lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
>  	struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>  
Other drivers reference the exit function using __devexit_p():

lm78.c:static int __devexit lm78_isa_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
lm78.c: .remove         = __devexit_p(lm78_isa_remove),

You might want to do the same.

Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-09 14:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-09 13:20 [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] lm75: some optimisations Shubhrajyoti D
2010-09-09 14:05 ` Guenter Roeck

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.