All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: tsc@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] base.bbclass: fix soc-family test
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:19:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100910191942.GJ28148@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=mk=GbouoAuh-roSwrKa0Mdt3P+CJN9fzL_gds@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:55:13AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote:
> 
> > >> I'd agree with this quite strongly.  I'm generally pretty careful to let
> > >> others review the changes from my coworkers, to avoid any bias.
> >
> > Not to point any fingers, but mishaps happen and numerous reverts would be
> > a
> > living proof of that in the repository... :) Nobody's perfect.
> 
> 
> Mishaps have nothing to do with this, nor does being perfect, or reverts.
>  You're missing the point entirely here.  The point is, if the only people
> who acked a patch are from the same company as the person who wrote it, they
> can't be considered to have been entirely unbiased in their review of it.

Chris,

Didn't mean to offend you by that joke, sorry about that. And I didn't mean 
you specifically, as we all had our share of revert...

But in the second, important :) part of my message, which you chose to ignore 
and remove from the reply, I did acknowledge the problem and agreed to the 
proposed changes. But, as I also mentioned, there should be a failsafe 
mechanism to eventually accept changes, if nobody cared to comment or 
strongly object, after the review period is over.

-- 
Denys



  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-10 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-02 18:52 [PATCH] base.bbclass: fix soc-family test Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-09  7:11 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-09  9:30   ` Phil Blundell
2010-09-09 10:07     ` Leon Woestenberg
2010-09-09 10:11     ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-09 12:20       ` Maupin, Chase
2010-09-09 13:16         ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-10 18:37           ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-09-10 21:20             ` Phil Blundell
2010-09-10 20:27               ` Maupin, Chase
2010-09-10 22:53                 ` Phil Blundell
2010-09-11 11:33             ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2010-09-09 14:06       ` Chris Larson
2010-09-09 14:16         ` Philip Balister
2010-09-10 18:50           ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-09-10 18:55             ` Chris Larson
2010-09-10 19:19               ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2010-09-10 20:38             ` Tom Rini
2010-09-10 22:26               ` Phil Blundell
2010-09-09 12:13   ` Maupin, Chase
2010-09-09 12:30   ` Maupin, Chase

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100910191942.GJ28148@denix.org \
    --to=denis@denix.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=tsc@openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.