All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: ben-linux@fluff.org
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
	kgene.kim@samsung.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	w.sang@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdhci-s3c: fix incorrect spinlock usage after merge
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 04:15:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100921031547.GA7073@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284987822-17955-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

Hi Ben,

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> In the commit f522886e202a34a2191dd5d471b3c4d46410a9a0 a merge conflict
> in the sdhci-s3c driver been fixed. However the fix used incorrect
> spinlock operation - it cause a race with sdhci interrupt service. The
> correct way to solve it is to use spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore() calls.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> index 71ad416..735d431 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> @@ -241,8 +241,10 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_s3c_ops = {
>  static void sdhci_s3c_notify_change(struct platform_device *dev, int state)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
>  	if (host) {
> -		spin_lock(&host->lock);
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>  		if (state) {
>  			dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "card inserted.\n");
>  			host->flags &= ~SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD;
> @@ -253,7 +255,7 @@ static void sdhci_s3c_notify_change(struct platform_device *dev, int state)
>  			host->quirks &= ~SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION;
>  		}
>  		tasklet_schedule(&host->card_tasklet);
> -		spin_unlock(&host->lock);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>  	}
>  }
>  

Could I have your ACK on this before I send it to Linus, please?

Thanks,

-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] sdhci-s3c: fix incorrect spinlock usage after merge
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 04:15:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100921031547.GA7073@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284987822-17955-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

Hi Ben,

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> In the commit f522886e202a34a2191dd5d471b3c4d46410a9a0 a merge conflict
> in the sdhci-s3c driver been fixed. However the fix used incorrect
> spinlock operation - it cause a race with sdhci interrupt service. The
> correct way to solve it is to use spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore() calls.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> index 71ad416..735d431 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> @@ -241,8 +241,10 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_s3c_ops = {
>  static void sdhci_s3c_notify_change(struct platform_device *dev, int state)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
>  	if (host) {
> -		spin_lock(&host->lock);
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>  		if (state) {
>  			dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "card inserted.\n");
>  			host->flags &= ~SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD;
> @@ -253,7 +255,7 @@ static void sdhci_s3c_notify_change(struct platform_device *dev, int state)
>  			host->quirks &= ~SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION;
>  		}
>  		tasklet_schedule(&host->card_tasklet);
> -		spin_unlock(&host->lock);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>  	}
>  }
>  

Could I have your ACK on this before I send it to Linus, please?

Thanks,

-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-21  3:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-20 13:03 [PATCH] sdhci-s3c: fix incorrect spinlock usage after merge Marek Szyprowski
2010-09-20 13:03 ` Marek Szyprowski
2010-09-21  1:17 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-21  1:17   ` Chris Ball
2010-09-21  1:29   ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-21  1:29     ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-21  3:15 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2010-09-21  3:15   ` Chris Ball

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100921031547.GA7073@void.printf.net \
    --to=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.