From: matt mooney <mfm@muteddisk.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:14:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101002041409.GA6370@haskell.muteddisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101001205646.GA10988@sepie.suse.cz>
On 22:56 Fri 01 Oct , Michal Marek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 04:19:04PM -0700, matt mooney wrote:
> > On 19:50 Wed 29 Sep , Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:03:29PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > > > On 20.9.2010 08:33, matt mooney wrote:
> > > > > Change $(src) and $(obj) definitions to state the path as absolute and
> > > > > not relative.
> > > >
> > > > It _is_ a relative patch, AFAICS. What makes you think otherwise?
> > >
> > > With extenal modules $(src) and $(obj) are absolute - but in nomal
> > > use they are relative.
>
> Ah, I see. Then we should simply say "path", without any adjectives.
That may lead to people wondering what kind of path it is, or assumptions that
it is absolute due to being stated as such in modules.txt. Maybe a more detailed
explanation would suffice.
-mfm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: matt mooney <mfm@muteddisk.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in makefiles.txt
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:14:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101002041409.GA6370@haskell.muteddisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101001205646.GA10988@sepie.suse.cz>
On 22:56 Fri 01 Oct , Michal Marek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 04:19:04PM -0700, matt mooney wrote:
> > On 19:50 Wed 29 Sep , Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:03:29PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > > > On 20.9.2010 08:33, matt mooney wrote:
> > > > > Change $(src) and $(obj) definitions to state the path as absolute and
> > > > > not relative.
> > > >
> > > > It _is_ a relative patch, AFAICS. What makes you think otherwise?
> > >
> > > With extenal modules $(src) and $(obj) are absolute - but in nomal
> > > use they are relative.
>
> Ah, I see. Then we should simply say "path", without any adjectives.
That may lead to people wondering what kind of path it is, or assumptions that
it is absolute due to being stated as such in modules.txt. Maybe a more detailed
explanation would suffice.
-mfm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-02 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-20 6:33 [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in makefiles.txt matt mooney
2010-09-20 6:33 ` matt mooney
2010-09-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in Michal Marek
2010-09-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in makefiles.txt Michal Marek
2010-09-29 17:50 ` [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-29 17:50 ` [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in makefiles.txt Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-29 23:19 ` [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in matt mooney
2010-09-29 23:19 ` [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in makefiles.txt matt mooney
2010-10-01 20:56 ` [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in Michal Marek
2010-10-01 20:56 ` [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in makefiles.txt Michal Marek
2010-10-02 4:14 ` matt mooney [this message]
2010-10-02 4:14 ` matt mooney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101002041409.GA6370@haskell.muteddisk.com \
--to=mfm@muteddisk.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.