All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sam@ravnborg.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: stop exporting openprom.h header
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 07:19:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101010001950.1e58211c@debxo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101010051324.GA9292@angua.secretlab.ca>

On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 23:13:24 -0600
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 01:48:08PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 02:51:43 -0600
> > Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> > 
[...]
> Hmmm, series fails to build on sparc32, and doesn't appear to be
> fully bisectable.  Patches 1-3 compile file.  Adding patch 4 gives

Thanks for testing!


> the following build error.  Missing include perhaps?
> 
> /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c: In function
> 'build_one_prop': /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:80:
> error: implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_firstprop' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:80:
> warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
> cast /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:82: error:
> implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_nextprop' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:82:
> warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
> cast /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:92: error:
> implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_getproplen' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:99:
> error: implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_getproperty' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c: In
> function
> 'prom_build_tree': /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:213:
> error: implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_getchild' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:218:
> error: implicit declaration of function 'prom_getsibling'
> distcc[16086] ERROR:
> compile /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c on localhost
> failed make[3]: *** [drivers/of/pdt.o] Error 1 make[2]: ***
> [drivers/of] Error 2 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> 
> And after applying patch 5, I get this instead:
> 
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c: In
> function
> 'prom_common_nextprop': /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c:144:
> error: passing argument 2 of 'prom_nextprop' discards qualifiers from
> pointer target
> type /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/include/asm/oplib_32.h:227:
> note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'const char *'
> make[2]: *** [arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.o] Error 1 make[2]: ***
> Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> 

D'oh:

arch/sparc/include/asm/oplib_32.h:extern char *prom_nextprop(phandle
node, char *prev_property, char *buffer);
arch/sparc/include/asm/oplib_64.h:extern char *prom_nextprop(phandle
node, const char *prev_property, char *buf);


> And applying the subsequent patches fails with the same error.
> Sparc64 builds fine with the entire stack applied, but I haven't
> bisected and I suspect that patch 4 will still fail there.
> 
> So, I'll leave patches 1-3 in my tree, and drop 4-7 until you get it
> sorted out.

I'll go ahead and resend 4-8 once I fix 'em up; the nextprop fix
require modifications to 5 and 8, and I haven't fixed the problem w/ 4
yet.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sam@ravnborg.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: stop exporting openprom.h header
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 00:19:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101010001950.1e58211c@debxo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101010051324.GA9292@angua.secretlab.ca>

On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 23:13:24 -0600
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 01:48:08PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 02:51:43 -0600
> > Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> > 
[...]
> Hmmm, series fails to build on sparc32, and doesn't appear to be
> fully bisectable.  Patches 1-3 compile file.  Adding patch 4 gives

Thanks for testing!


> the following build error.  Missing include perhaps?
> 
> /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c: In function
> 'build_one_prop': /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:80:
> error: implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_firstprop' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:80:
> warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
> cast /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:82: error:
> implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_nextprop' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:82:
> warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
> cast /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:92: error:
> implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_getproplen' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:99:
> error: implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_getproperty' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c: In
> function
> 'prom_build_tree': /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:213:
> error: implicit declaration of function
> 'prom_getchild' /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c:218:
> error: implicit declaration of function 'prom_getsibling'
> distcc[16086] ERROR:
> compile /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/drivers/of/pdt.c on localhost
> failed make[3]: *** [drivers/of/pdt.o] Error 1 make[2]: ***
> [drivers/of] Error 2 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> 
> And after applying patch 5, I get this instead:
> 
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c: In
> function
> 'prom_common_nextprop': /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c:144:
> error: passing argument 2 of 'prom_nextprop' discards qualifiers from
> pointer target
> type /home/grant/hacking/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/include/asm/oplib_32.h:227:
> note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'const char *'
> make[2]: *** [arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.o] Error 1 make[2]: ***
> Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> 

D'oh:

arch/sparc/include/asm/oplib_32.h:extern char *prom_nextprop(phandle
node, char *prev_property, char *buffer);
arch/sparc/include/asm/oplib_64.h:extern char *prom_nextprop(phandle
node, const char *prev_property, char *buf);


> And applying the subsequent patches fails with the same error.
> Sparc64 builds fine with the entire stack applied, but I haven't
> bisected and I suspect that patch 4 will still fail there.
> 
> So, I'll leave patches 1-3 in my tree, and drop 4-7 until you get it
> sorted out.

I'll go ahead and resend 4-8 once I fix 'em up; the nextprop fix
require modifications to 5 and 8, and I haven't fixed the problem w/ 4
yet.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-10  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-08  7:43 [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export to Andres Salomon
2010-10-08  7:43 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export to userspace Andres Salomon
2010-10-08  7:43 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and Grant Likely
2010-10-08 17:12   ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export to userspace Grant Likely
2010-10-08 17:17   ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and David Miller
2010-10-08 17:17     ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export to userspace David Miller
2010-10-08 17:36     ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and Grant Likely
2010-10-08 17:36       ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export to userspace Grant Likely
     [not found]       ` <20101008173650.GH3863-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-08 17:45         ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and David Miller
2010-10-08 17:45           ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export to userspace David Miller
2010-10-08 17:45           ` David Miller
2010-10-08 18:27           ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and Grant Likely
2010-10-08 18:27             ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export to userspace Grant Likely
2010-10-08 18:38             ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export Andres Salomon
2010-10-08 18:38               ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export to userspace Andres Salomon
2010-10-08 18:34           ` [PATCH] sparc: stop exporting openprom.h header Andres Salomon
2010-10-08 18:34             ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-08 18:52             ` David Miller
2010-10-08 18:52               ` David Miller
2010-10-08 19:00               ` Grant Likely
2010-10-08 19:00                 ` Grant Likely
2010-10-08 19:00                 ` Grant Likely
     [not found]                 ` <AANLkTikuaM5VZadCs302HwYYhOHi1Czw2BLam3ZQP=aj-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-08 19:02                   ` David Miller
2010-10-08 19:02                     ` David Miller
2010-10-08 19:02                     ` David Miller
2010-10-08 21:34                 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-08 21:34                   ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-08 21:34                   ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-09  8:51                   ` Grant Likely
2010-10-09  8:51                     ` Grant Likely
2010-10-09  8:51                     ` Grant Likely
2010-10-09 20:48                     ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-09 20:48                       ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-10  5:13                       ` Grant Likely
2010-10-10  5:13                         ` Grant Likely
2010-10-10  7:19                         ` Andres Salomon [this message]
2010-10-10  7:19                           ` Andres Salomon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101010001950.1e58211c@debxo \
    --to=dilinger@queued.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.