From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:50:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101010235015.2954811f@uxo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101011040443.GA23588-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:04:43 -0600
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:09:05AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Whoops, that should've been 1/5, not 1/7. Two additional x86
> > patches snuck in there that are already in Grant's test-devicetree
> > branch.
>
> Note that of the two patches I'm carrying in test-devicetree, only one
> of them is actually able to move into linux-next at this present time.
>
> 1) of/irq: remove references to NO_IRQ in drivers/of/platform.c
>
> I'm putting this one into next-devicetree now
>
> 2) x86/of: define irq functions to allow drivers/of/* to build on x86
>
> I've not yet received an ack from the x86 maintainers on this, so I
> cannot put it into my next branch. (Sorry I didn't notice this
> earlier; it just dawned on me as I was looking over which patches I
> needed to move over). The same goes for the patch that actaully adds
> OF support for x86 OLPC. I'll need an ack from x86 folks before I
> merge it.
>
> g.
Okay. For reference, that patch is:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/168662/
x86 folks, mind reviewing and providing an Ack or Nack?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:50:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101010235015.2954811f@uxo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101011040443.GA23588@angua.secretlab.ca>
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:04:43 -0600
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:09:05AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Whoops, that should've been 1/5, not 1/7. Two additional x86
> > patches snuck in there that are already in Grant's test-devicetree
> > branch.
>
> Note that of the two patches I'm carrying in test-devicetree, only one
> of them is actually able to move into linux-next at this present time.
>
> 1) of/irq: remove references to NO_IRQ in drivers/of/platform.c
>
> I'm putting this one into next-devicetree now
>
> 2) x86/of: define irq functions to allow drivers/of/* to build on x86
>
> I've not yet received an ack from the x86 maintainers on this, so I
> cannot put it into my next branch. (Sorry I didn't notice this
> earlier; it just dawned on me as I was looking over which patches I
> needed to move over). The same goes for the patch that actaully adds
> OF support for x86 OLPC. I'll need an ack from x86 folks before I
> merge it.
>
> g.
Okay. For reference, that patch is:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/168662/
x86 folks, mind reviewing and providing an Ack or Nack?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:50:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101010235015.2954811f@uxo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101011040443.GA23588-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:04:43 -0600
Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:09:05AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Whoops, that should've been 1/5, not 1/7. Two additional x86
> > patches snuck in there that are already in Grant's test-devicetree
> > branch.
>
> Note that of the two patches I'm carrying in test-devicetree, only one
> of them is actually able to move into linux-next at this present time.
>
> 1) of/irq: remove references to NO_IRQ in drivers/of/platform.c
>
> I'm putting this one into next-devicetree now
>
> 2) x86/of: define irq functions to allow drivers/of/* to build on x86
>
> I've not yet received an ack from the x86 maintainers on this, so I
> cannot put it into my next branch. (Sorry I didn't notice this
> earlier; it just dawned on me as I was looking over which patches I
> needed to move over). The same goes for the patch that actaully adds
> OF support for x86 OLPC. I'll need an ack from x86 folks before I
> merge it.
>
> g.
Okay. For reference, that patch is:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/168662/
x86 folks, mind reviewing and providing an Ack or Nack?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-11 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-10 8:43 [PATCH 1/7] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only Andres Salomon
2010-10-10 8:43 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-10 9:09 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-10 9:09 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-11 4:04 ` Grant Likely
2010-10-11 4:04 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20101011040443.GA23588-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-11 6:50 ` Andres Salomon [this message]
2010-10-11 6:50 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-11 6:50 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-11 4:10 ` Grant Likely
2010-10-11 4:10 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20101011041010.GB23588-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-11 4:11 ` David Miller
2010-10-11 4:11 ` David Miller
2010-10-11 4:11 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101010235015.2954811f@uxo \
--to=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.