All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>,
	"linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>,
	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:32:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101114173208.GA23017@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDF3DA1.2090806@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7348 bytes --]

Hi,

I just found another problem. When passing "mem=256" to 2.6.37-rc1,
it dies hard early (not able to print any boot log). With this patch
applied, it's a bit better: it shows a kernel panic, but still dies
hard (not able to reboot with "panic=10").

Attached is the screenshot in kvm (it's not specific to kvm, it dies
hard on two more physical boxes). The screenshot shows that it panics
inside reserve_trampoline_memory().

Thanks,
Fengguang

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:38:41AM +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> Recent Intel new system have different order in MADT, aka will list all thread0
> at first, then all thread1.
> But SRAT table still old order, it will list cpus in one socket all together.
> 
> If the user have compiled limited NR_CPUS or boot with nr_cpus=, could have missed
> to put some cpus apic id to node mapping into apicid_to_node[].
> 
> for example for 4 sockets system with 64 cpus with nr_cpus=32 will get crash...
> 
> [    9.106288] Total of 32 processors activated (136190.88 BogoMIPS).
> [    9.235021] divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP 
> [    9.235315] last sysfs file: 
> [    9.235481] CPU 1 
> [    9.235592] Modules linked in:
> [    9.245398] 
> [    9.245478] Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.37-rc1-tip-yh-01782-ge92ef79-dirty #274      /Sun Fire x4800
> [    9.265415] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81075a8f>]  [<ffffffff81075a8f>] select_task_rq_fair+0x4f0/0x623
> [    9.265835] RSP: 0000:ffff88103f8d1c40  EFLAGS: 00010046
> [    9.285550] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88103f887de0 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [    9.305356] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: 0000000000000200
> [    9.305711] RBP: ffff88103f8d1d10 R08: 0000000000000200 R09: ffff88103f887e38
> [    9.325709] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
> [    9.326038] R13: ffff88107e80dfb0 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88103f887e40
> [    9.345655] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88107e800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [    9.365503] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> [    9.365776] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000002417000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> [    9.385583] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [    9.405368] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [    9.405713] Process kthreadd (pid: 2, threadinfo ffff88103f8d0000, task ffff88305c8aa2d0)
> [    9.425563] Stack:
> [    9.425668]  ffff88103f8d1cb0 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 0000000200000000
> [    9.445509]  0000000000000000 0000000100000000 0000000000000046 ffffffff82bd1ce0
> [    9.465350]  000000015c8aa2d0 00000000001d2540 00000000001d2540 0000007d3f8d1d28
> [    9.465763] Call Trace:
> [    9.465875]  [<ffffffff810747c3>] wake_up_new_task+0x3c/0x10e
> [    9.485486]  [<ffffffff8107b2e3>] do_fork+0x28c/0x35f
> [    9.485753]  [<ffffffff810ab832>] ? __lock_acquire+0x1801/0x1813
> [    9.505474]  [<ffffffff8106f2bd>] ? finish_task_switch+0x80/0xf4
> [    9.525264]  [<ffffffff8106f286>] ? finish_task_switch+0x49/0xf4
> [    9.525575]  [<ffffffff8109da72>] ? local_clock+0x2b/0x3c
> [    9.545281]  [<ffffffff8103da76>] kernel_thread+0x70/0x72
> [    9.545544]  [<ffffffff81097c83>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa8
> [    9.545797]  [<ffffffff81037990>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> [    9.565519]  [<ffffffff81098099>] kthreadd+0xe8/0x12b
> [    9.585185]  [<ffffffff81037994>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [    9.585485]  [<ffffffff81cd793c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [    9.605192]  [<ffffffff81097fb1>] ? kthreadd+0x0/0x12b
> [    9.605479]  [<ffffffff81037990>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> [    9.625295] Code: a0 be 00 02 00 00 ff c2 48 63 d2 e8 f8 67 3b 00 3b 05 86 8e 52 01 48 89 c7 89 45 c8 7c c1 48 8b 45 b0 8b 4b 08 31 d2 48 c1 e0 0a <48> f7 f1 45 85 e4 75 08 48 3b 45 b8 72 08 eb 0d 48 89 45 a8 eb 
> [    9.645938] RIP  [<ffffffff81075a8f>] select_task_rq_fair+0x4f0/0x623
> [    9.665356]  RSP <ffff88103f8d1c40>
> [    9.665568] ---[ end trace 2296156d35fdfc87 ]---
> 
> So let just parse all cpu entries in SRAT.
> 
> Also add apicid checking with MAX_LOCAL_APIC, in case We could out of boundaries of
> apicid_to_node[].
> 
> it should fix following bug too.
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22662
> 
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |    7 +++++++
>  arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c       |    8 ++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/numa.c         |   14 ++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -198,6 +198,13 @@ static void __cpuinit acpi_register_lapi
>  {
>  	unsigned int ver = 0;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +	if (id >= (MAX_APICS-1)) {
> +		printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "skipped apicid that is too big\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
>  	if (!enabled) {
>  		++disabled_cpus;
>  		return;
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,10 @@ acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(struct ac
>  	}
>  
>  	apic_id = pa->apic_id;
> +	if (apic_id >= MAX_LOCAL_APIC) {
> +		printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%04x -> Node %u skipped that apicid too big\n", pxm, apic_id, node);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
>  	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
>  	acpi_numa = 1;
> @@ -168,6 +172,10 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct
>  		apic_id = (pa->apic_id << 8) | pa->local_sapic_eid;
>  	else
>  		apic_id = pa->apic_id;
> +	if (apic_id >= MAX_LOCAL_APIC) {
> +		printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%02x -> Node %u skipped apicid that is too big\n", pxm, apic_id, node);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
>  	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
>  	acpi_numa = 1;
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> @@ -275,13 +275,23 @@ acpi_table_parse_srat(enum acpi_srat_typ
>  int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
> +	int nr_cpu_entries = nr_cpu_ids;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +	/*
> +	 * Should not limit number with cpu num that will handle,
> +	 * SRAT cpu entries could have different order with that in MADT.
> +	 * So go over all cpu entries in SRAT to get apicid to node mapping.
> +	 */
> +	nr_cpu_entries = MAX_LOCAL_APIC;
> +#endif
>  
>  	/* SRAT: Static Resource Affinity Table */
>  	if (!acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, acpi_parse_srat)) {
>  		acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_X2APIC_CPU_AFFINITY,
> -				     acpi_parse_x2apic_affinity, nr_cpu_ids);
> +				     acpi_parse_x2apic_affinity, nr_cpu_entries);
>  		acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY,
> -				     acpi_parse_processor_affinity, nr_cpu_ids);
> +				     acpi_parse_processor_affinity, nr_cpu_entries);
>  		ret = acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY,
>  					    acpi_parse_memory_affinity,
>  					    NR_NODE_MEMBLKS);

[-- Attachment #2: panic-reserve_trampoline_memory.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 18830 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>,
	"linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>,
	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 01:32:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101114173208.GA23017@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDF3DA1.2090806@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7348 bytes --]

Hi,

I just found another problem. When passing "mem=256" to 2.6.37-rc1,
it dies hard early (not able to print any boot log). With this patch
applied, it's a bit better: it shows a kernel panic, but still dies
hard (not able to reboot with "panic=10").

Attached is the screenshot in kvm (it's not specific to kvm, it dies
hard on two more physical boxes). The screenshot shows that it panics
inside reserve_trampoline_memory().

Thanks,
Fengguang

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:38:41AM +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> Recent Intel new system have different order in MADT, aka will list all thread0
> at first, then all thread1.
> But SRAT table still old order, it will list cpus in one socket all together.
> 
> If the user have compiled limited NR_CPUS or boot with nr_cpus=, could have missed
> to put some cpus apic id to node mapping into apicid_to_node[].
> 
> for example for 4 sockets system with 64 cpus with nr_cpus=32 will get crash...
> 
> [    9.106288] Total of 32 processors activated (136190.88 BogoMIPS).
> [    9.235021] divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP 
> [    9.235315] last sysfs file: 
> [    9.235481] CPU 1 
> [    9.235592] Modules linked in:
> [    9.245398] 
> [    9.245478] Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.37-rc1-tip-yh-01782-ge92ef79-dirty #274      /Sun Fire x4800
> [    9.265415] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81075a8f>]  [<ffffffff81075a8f>] select_task_rq_fair+0x4f0/0x623
> [    9.265835] RSP: 0000:ffff88103f8d1c40  EFLAGS: 00010046
> [    9.285550] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88103f887de0 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [    9.305356] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: 0000000000000200
> [    9.305711] RBP: ffff88103f8d1d10 R08: 0000000000000200 R09: ffff88103f887e38
> [    9.325709] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
> [    9.326038] R13: ffff88107e80dfb0 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88103f887e40
> [    9.345655] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88107e800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [    9.365503] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> [    9.365776] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000002417000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> [    9.385583] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [    9.405368] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [    9.405713] Process kthreadd (pid: 2, threadinfo ffff88103f8d0000, task ffff88305c8aa2d0)
> [    9.425563] Stack:
> [    9.425668]  ffff88103f8d1cb0 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 0000000200000000
> [    9.445509]  0000000000000000 0000000100000000 0000000000000046 ffffffff82bd1ce0
> [    9.465350]  000000015c8aa2d0 00000000001d2540 00000000001d2540 0000007d3f8d1d28
> [    9.465763] Call Trace:
> [    9.465875]  [<ffffffff810747c3>] wake_up_new_task+0x3c/0x10e
> [    9.485486]  [<ffffffff8107b2e3>] do_fork+0x28c/0x35f
> [    9.485753]  [<ffffffff810ab832>] ? __lock_acquire+0x1801/0x1813
> [    9.505474]  [<ffffffff8106f2bd>] ? finish_task_switch+0x80/0xf4
> [    9.525264]  [<ffffffff8106f286>] ? finish_task_switch+0x49/0xf4
> [    9.525575]  [<ffffffff8109da72>] ? local_clock+0x2b/0x3c
> [    9.545281]  [<ffffffff8103da76>] kernel_thread+0x70/0x72
> [    9.545544]  [<ffffffff81097c83>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa8
> [    9.545797]  [<ffffffff81037990>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> [    9.565519]  [<ffffffff81098099>] kthreadd+0xe8/0x12b
> [    9.585185]  [<ffffffff81037994>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [    9.585485]  [<ffffffff81cd793c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [    9.605192]  [<ffffffff81097fb1>] ? kthreadd+0x0/0x12b
> [    9.605479]  [<ffffffff81037990>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> [    9.625295] Code: a0 be 00 02 00 00 ff c2 48 63 d2 e8 f8 67 3b 00 3b 05 86 8e 52 01 48 89 c7 89 45 c8 7c c1 48 8b 45 b0 8b 4b 08 31 d2 48 c1 e0 0a <48> f7 f1 45 85 e4 75 08 48 3b 45 b8 72 08 eb 0d 48 89 45 a8 eb 
> [    9.645938] RIP  [<ffffffff81075a8f>] select_task_rq_fair+0x4f0/0x623
> [    9.665356]  RSP <ffff88103f8d1c40>
> [    9.665568] ---[ end trace 2296156d35fdfc87 ]---
> 
> So let just parse all cpu entries in SRAT.
> 
> Also add apicid checking with MAX_LOCAL_APIC, in case We could out of boundaries of
> apicid_to_node[].
> 
> it should fix following bug too.
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22662
> 
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |    7 +++++++
>  arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c       |    8 ++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/numa.c         |   14 ++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -198,6 +198,13 @@ static void __cpuinit acpi_register_lapi
>  {
>  	unsigned int ver = 0;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +	if (id >= (MAX_APICS-1)) {
> +		printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "skipped apicid that is too big\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
>  	if (!enabled) {
>  		++disabled_cpus;
>  		return;
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,10 @@ acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(struct ac
>  	}
>  
>  	apic_id = pa->apic_id;
> +	if (apic_id >= MAX_LOCAL_APIC) {
> +		printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%04x -> Node %u skipped that apicid too big\n", pxm, apic_id, node);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
>  	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
>  	acpi_numa = 1;
> @@ -168,6 +172,10 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct
>  		apic_id = (pa->apic_id << 8) | pa->local_sapic_eid;
>  	else
>  		apic_id = pa->apic_id;
> +	if (apic_id >= MAX_LOCAL_APIC) {
> +		printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%02x -> Node %u skipped apicid that is too big\n", pxm, apic_id, node);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
>  	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
>  	acpi_numa = 1;
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> @@ -275,13 +275,23 @@ acpi_table_parse_srat(enum acpi_srat_typ
>  int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
> +	int nr_cpu_entries = nr_cpu_ids;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +	/*
> +	 * Should not limit number with cpu num that will handle,
> +	 * SRAT cpu entries could have different order with that in MADT.
> +	 * So go over all cpu entries in SRAT to get apicid to node mapping.
> +	 */
> +	nr_cpu_entries = MAX_LOCAL_APIC;
> +#endif
>  
>  	/* SRAT: Static Resource Affinity Table */
>  	if (!acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, acpi_parse_srat)) {
>  		acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_X2APIC_CPU_AFFINITY,
> -				     acpi_parse_x2apic_affinity, nr_cpu_ids);
> +				     acpi_parse_x2apic_affinity, nr_cpu_entries);
>  		acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY,
> -				     acpi_parse_processor_affinity, nr_cpu_ids);
> +				     acpi_parse_processor_affinity, nr_cpu_entries);
>  		ret = acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY,
>  					    acpi_parse_memory_affinity,
>  					    NR_NODE_MEMBLKS);

[-- Attachment #2: panic-reserve_trampoline_memory.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 18830 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-14 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-11 10:06 [BUG 2.6.27-rc1] find_busiest_group() LOCKUP Wu Fengguang
2010-11-11 10:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-11 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-11 12:40   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-11 13:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13  8:40       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13  8:40         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 10:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 10:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 12:00           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 12:00             ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 12:57             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 12:57               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 13:10               ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 13:10                 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 19:12                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-13 19:12                   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-13 19:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 19:41                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 23:57                   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-14  0:18                     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14  0:18                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14  0:55                       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-14  1:38                     ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14  1:38                       ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 17:32                       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-11-14 17:32                         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-14 18:02                         ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 18:02                           ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 18:19                         ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 18:19                           ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-11-15  1:22                           ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Wu Fengguang
2010-11-15  1:22                             ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Wu Fengguang
2010-12-15 22:01                       ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 22:01                         ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 22:40                         ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-12-15 22:40                           ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-12-15 22:53                           ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 22:53                             ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 22:57                             ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-12-15 22:57                               ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17  3:09                             ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, acpi: add MAX_LOCAL_APIC for 32bit Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17  3:09                               ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17  3:09                               ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17  3:09                                 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 18:53                                 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-17 18:53                                   ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-17 19:27                                   ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 19:27                                     ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 19:35                                     ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have Kay Sievers
2010-12-17 19:35                                       ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Kay Sievers
2010-12-17 23:32                                     ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-21  4:31                                       ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-22  6:43                                         ` David Rientjes
2010-12-22 20:28                                           ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-22 22:51                                             ` David Rientjes
2010-12-27 18:43                                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-23 23:22                                 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even above the cpu number limitation tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 20:56                               ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, acpi: add MAX_LOCAL_APIC for 32bit David Rientjes
2010-12-17 20:56                                 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-23 23:21                               ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, acpi: Add " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-11-11 12:42   ` [BUG 2.6.27-rc1] find_busiest_group() LOCKUP Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101114173208.GA23017@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=knikanth@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ncrao@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.