From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>,
"linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>,
Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:27:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0BB9AD.90506@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin-LGig2RHHmvvy5H04jQRus_1mmS1Cr4KDWKsN@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/17/2010 10:53 AM, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> linus git + these two patches still fails on my test system with the
> divide error. The failure dump is similar to what I reported here
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail//linux/kernel/1012.1/03641.html
>
> This patch description talk about new Intel systems. The test system I
> am seeing failure here is an ancient Intel (2 socket P4 HT) system.
> AFAICS, it does not even have an SRAT table (no "ACPI: SRAT" message
> in dmesg).
that could be different cause.
Do you have whole boot log with debug etc?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>,
"linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>,
Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:27:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0BB9AD.90506@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin-LGig2RHHmvvy5H04jQRus_1mmS1Cr4KDWKsN@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/17/2010 10:53 AM, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> linus git + these two patches still fails on my test system with the
> divide error. The failure dump is similar to what I reported here
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail//linux/kernel/1012.1/03641.html
>
> This patch description talk about new Intel systems. The test system I
> am seeing failure here is an ancient Intel (2 socket P4 HT) system.
> AFAICS, it does not even have an SRAT table (no "ACPI: SRAT" message
> in dmesg).
that could be different cause.
Do you have whole boot log with debug etc?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-17 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-11 10:06 [BUG 2.6.27-rc1] find_busiest_group() LOCKUP Wu Fengguang
2010-11-11 10:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-11 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-11 12:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-11 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 8:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 8:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 12:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 12:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 13:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 13:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-13 19:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-13 19:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-13 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-13 23:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-14 0:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 0:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 0:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-14 1:38 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 1:38 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 17:32 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Wu Fengguang
2010-11-14 17:32 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Wu Fengguang
2010-11-14 18:02 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 18:02 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 18:19 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-11-14 18:19 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-11-15 1:22 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Wu Fengguang
2010-11-15 1:22 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Wu Fengguang
2010-12-15 22:01 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 22:01 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 22:40 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-12-15 22:40 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-12-15 22:53 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 22:53 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 22:57 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-12-15 22:57 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 3:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, acpi: add MAX_LOCAL_APIC for 32bit Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 3:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 3:09 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 3:09 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 18:53 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-17 18:53 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-17 19:27 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-12-17 19:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 19:35 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have Kay Sievers
2010-12-17 19:35 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have cpu num limitation Kay Sievers
2010-12-17 23:32 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-21 4:31 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-22 6:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-22 20:28 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-22 22:51 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-27 18:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-23 23:22 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even above the cpu number limitation tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, acpi: add MAX_LOCAL_APIC for 32bit David Rientjes
2010-12-17 20:56 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-23 23:21 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, acpi: Add " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-11-11 12:42 ` [BUG 2.6.27-rc1] find_busiest_group() LOCKUP Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0BB9AD.90506@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncrao@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venki@google.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.