All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] MCDE: Add build files and bus
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:49:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101130234937.GA7156@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101130234215.GE8521@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:42:15PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > It's a work in progress, but wherever possible, I encourage people to
> > not make 'struct device' static.
> 
> Right, so saying to ARM developers that they can't submit code which
> adds new static device structures is rather problematical then, and
> effectively brings a section of kernel development to a complete
> standstill - it means no support for additional ARM platforms until
> this issue is resolved.  (This "condition" was mentioned by Arnd
> earlier in this thread, and was put in such a way that it was now
> a hard and fast rule.)

Sorry, I didn't mean for that to be mentioned that way at all, as I know
the issues that are keeping this from happening.

> I feel it would be better to allow the current situation to continue.
> If we start telling people that they can't use statically declared
> devices without first having an alternative, we'll end up with people
> inventing their own individual - and different - solutions to this
> problem, which could actually make the problem harder to resolve in
> the longer term.

Ok, but again, I do encourage, wherever possible, that people do not
statically create a 'struct device'.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Jimmy RUBIN <jimmy.rubin@stericsson.com>,
	Dan JOHANSSON <dan.johansson@stericsson.com>,
	Marcus LORENTZON <marcus.xm.lorentzon@stericsson.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] MCDE: Add build files and bus
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:49:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101130234937.GA7156@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101130234215.GE8521@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:42:15PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > It's a work in progress, but wherever possible, I encourage people to
> > not make 'struct device' static.
> 
> Right, so saying to ARM developers that they can't submit code which
> adds new static device structures is rather problematical then, and
> effectively brings a section of kernel development to a complete
> standstill - it means no support for additional ARM platforms until
> this issue is resolved.  (This "condition" was mentioned by Arnd
> earlier in this thread, and was put in such a way that it was now
> a hard and fast rule.)

Sorry, I didn't mean for that to be mentioned that way at all, as I know
the issues that are keeping this from happening.

> I feel it would be better to allow the current situation to continue.
> If we start telling people that they can't use statically declared
> devices without first having an alternative, we'll end up with people
> inventing their own individual - and different - solutions to this
> problem, which could actually make the problem harder to resolve in
> the longer term.

Ok, but again, I do encourage, wherever possible, that people do not
statically create a 'struct device'.

thanks,

greg k-h


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jimmy RUBIN <jimmy.rubin@stericsson.com>,
	Dan JOHANSSON <dan.johansson@stericsson.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Marcus LORENTZON <marcus.xm.lorentzon@stericsson.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] MCDE: Add build files and bus
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:49:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101130234937.GA7156@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101130234215.GE8521@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:42:15PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > It's a work in progress, but wherever possible, I encourage people to
> > not make 'struct device' static.
> 
> Right, so saying to ARM developers that they can't submit code which
> adds new static device structures is rather problematical then, and
> effectively brings a section of kernel development to a complete
> standstill - it means no support for additional ARM platforms until
> this issue is resolved.  (This "condition" was mentioned by Arnd
> earlier in this thread, and was put in such a way that it was now
> a hard and fast rule.)

Sorry, I didn't mean for that to be mentioned that way at all, as I know
the issues that are keeping this from happening.

> I feel it would be better to allow the current situation to continue.
> If we start telling people that they can't use statically declared
> devices without first having an alternative, we'll end up with people
> inventing their own individual - and different - solutions to this
> problem, which could actually make the problem harder to resolve in
> the longer term.

Ok, but again, I do encourage, wherever possible, that people do not
statically create a 'struct device'.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-30 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <F45880696056844FA6A73F415B568C6953604E802E@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local>
2010-11-25 12:25 ` [PATCH 09/10] MCDE: Add build files and bus Marcus LORENTZON
2010-11-25 16:47   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-25 18:00     ` Marcus LORENTZON
2010-11-26 11:24       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-26 11:24         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-26 11:24         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-30 14:18         ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-30 14:18           ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-30 15:21           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-30 15:21             ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-30 16:24             ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 16:24               ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 18:40             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 18:40               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 18:48               ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 18:48                 ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 22:05                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 22:05                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 23:05                   ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 23:05                     ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 23:42                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 23:42                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 23:49                       ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-11-30 23:49                         ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 23:49                         ` Greg KH
2010-12-01 12:53                       ` Peter Stuge
2010-12-01 12:53                         ` Peter Stuge
2010-12-01 13:02                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-01 13:02                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-01 15:39                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-01 15:39                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-01 15:39                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-04  6:52         ` Dave Airlie
2010-12-04  6:52           ` Dave Airlie
2010-12-04  6:52           ` Dave Airlie
2010-12-04 21:34         ` Alex Deucher
2010-12-04 21:34           ` Alex Deucher
2010-12-05 11:28           ` Daniel Vetter
2010-12-05 11:28             ` Daniel Vetter
2010-12-05 11:28             ` Daniel Vetter
2011-03-12 15:59             ` Rob Clark
2011-03-12 15:59               ` Rob Clark
2011-03-12 15:59               ` Rob Clark
2011-03-14 14:03               ` Marcus Lorentzon
2011-03-14 14:03                 ` Marcus Lorentzon
2011-03-14 20:35                 ` Rob Clark
2011-03-14 20:35                   ` Rob Clark
2011-03-14 20:35                   ` Rob Clark
2010-12-16 18:26         ` Marcus Lorentzon
2010-12-16 18:26           ` Marcus Lorentzon
2010-12-16 18:26           ` Marcus Lorentzon
2010-12-17 11:22           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-17 11:22             ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-17 12:02             ` Marcus Lorentzon
2010-12-17 12:02               ` Marcus Lorentzon
2010-11-10 12:04 [PATCH 00/10] MCDE: Add frame buffer device driver Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04 ` [PATCH 01/10] MCDE: Add hardware abstraction layer Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04   ` [PATCH 02/10] MCDE: Add configuration registers Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04     ` [PATCH 03/10] MCDE: Add pixel processing registers Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04       ` [PATCH 04/10] MCDE: Add formatter registers Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04         ` [PATCH 05/10] MCDE: Add dsi link registers Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04           ` [PATCH 06/10] MCDE: Add generic display Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04             ` [PATCH 07/10] MCDE: Add display subsystem framework Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04               ` [PATCH 08/10] MCDE: Add frame buffer device Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04                 ` [PATCH 09/10] MCDE: Add build files and bus Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04                   ` Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-10 12:04                   ` Jimmy Rubin
2010-11-12 16:23                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-12 16:23                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-12 16:23                     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101130234937.GA7156@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.