From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-lvm@redhat.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Bugs in mkfs.xfs, device mapper, xfs, and /dev/ram
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:17:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101202141737.GA29799@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF7A9C4.2040607@shiftmail.org>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:14:28PM +0100, Spelic wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 03:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >I'm pretty sure you have CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT enabled. This
> >option must never be enabled, as it causes block devices to be
> >randomly renumered. Together with the ramdisk driver overloading
> >the BLKFLSBUF ioctl to discard all data it guarantees you to get
> >data loss like yours.
>
> Nope...
>
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT is not set
Hmm, I suspect dm-linear's dumb forwarding of ioctls has the same
effect.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-lvm@redhat.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Bugs in mkfs.xfs, device mapper, xfs, and /dev/ram
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:17:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101202141737.GA29799@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF7A9C4.2040607@shiftmail.org>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:14:28PM +0100, Spelic wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 03:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >I'm pretty sure you have CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT enabled. This
> >option must never be enabled, as it causes block devices to be
> >randomly renumered. Together with the ramdisk driver overloading
> >the BLKFLSBUF ioctl to discard all data it guarantees you to get
> >data loss like yours.
>
> Nope...
>
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT is not set
Hmm, I suspect dm-linear's dumb forwarding of ioctls has the same
effect.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bugs in mkfs.xfs, device mapper, xfs, and /dev/ram
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:17:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101202141737.GA29799@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF7A9C4.2040607@shiftmail.org>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:14:28PM +0100, Spelic wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 03:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >I'm pretty sure you have CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT enabled. This
> >option must never be enabled, as it causes block devices to be
> >randomly renumered. Together with the ramdisk driver overloading
> >the BLKFLSBUF ioctl to discard all data it guarantees you to get
> >data loss like yours.
>
> Nope...
>
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT is not set
Hmm, I suspect dm-linear's dumb forwarding of ioctls has the same
effect.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-02 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-02 13:55 [linux-lvm] Bugs in mkfs.xfs, device mapper, xfs, and /dev/ram Spelic
2010-12-02 13:55 ` Spelic
2010-12-02 13:55 ` Spelic
2010-12-02 14:11 ` [linux-lvm] " Christoph Hellwig
2010-12-02 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-12-02 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-12-02 14:14 ` [linux-lvm] " Spelic
2010-12-02 14:14 ` Spelic
2010-12-02 14:14 ` Spelic
2010-12-02 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-12-02 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-12-02 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-12-02 21:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-02 21:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-02 21:22 ` [linux-lvm] " Mike Snitzer
2010-12-02 22:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-02 22:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-02 22:08 ` [linux-lvm] " Mike Snitzer
2010-12-03 17:11 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-03 17:11 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-03 17:11 ` [linux-lvm] " Nick Piggin
2010-12-03 18:15 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-12-03 18:15 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-12-03 18:15 ` [linux-lvm] " Ted Ts'o
2010-12-02 14:14 ` Spelic
2010-12-02 14:14 ` Spelic
2010-12-02 14:14 ` Spelic
2010-12-02 23:07 ` [linux-lvm] " Dave Chinner
2010-12-02 23:07 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-02 23:07 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-03 14:07 ` [linux-lvm] " Spelic
2010-12-03 14:07 ` Spelic
2010-12-03 14:07 ` Spelic
2010-12-06 4:09 ` [linux-lvm] " Dave Chinner
2010-12-06 4:09 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-06 4:09 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-06 12:20 ` [linux-lvm] NFS corruption on ENOSPC (was: Re: Bugs in mkfs.xfs, device mapper, xfs, and /dev/ram) Spelic
2010-12-06 12:20 ` Spelic
2010-12-06 12:20 ` Spelic
2010-12-06 13:33 ` [linux-lvm] " Trond Myklebust
2010-12-06 13:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-06 13:33 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101202141737.GA29799@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=spelic@shiftmail.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.