All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:56:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101216150920.866959114@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101216145602.899838254@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: sched-change-ttwu-return.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5219 bytes --]

try_to_wake_up() would only return a success when it would have to
place a task on a rq, change that to every time we change p->state to
TASK_RUNNING, because that's the real measure of wakeups.

This results in that success is always true for the tracepoint, so
remove its success argument.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 include/trace/events/sched.h      |   18 ++++++++----------
 kernel/sched.c                    |   18 ++++++++----------
 kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c |    3 +--
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2327,10 +2327,10 @@ static inline void ttwu_activate(struct 
 	activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
 }
 
-static inline void ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
-					int wake_flags, bool success)
+static void
+ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, int wake_flags)
 {
-	trace_sched_wakeup(p, success);
+	trace_sched_wakeup(p);
 	check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
 
 	p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
@@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ static inline void ttwu_post_activation(
 	}
 #endif
 	/* if a worker is waking up, notify workqueue */
-	if ((p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) && success)
+	if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
 		wq_worker_waking_up(p, cpu_of(rq));
 }
 
@@ -2449,9 +2449,9 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 	ttwu_activate(p, rq, wake_flags & WF_SYNC, orig_cpu != cpu,
 		      cpu == this_cpu, en_flags);
-	success = 1;
 out_running:
-	ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags, success);
+	ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags);
+	success = 1;
 out:
 	task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
 	put_cpu();
@@ -2470,7 +2470,6 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
 static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
-	bool success = false;
 
 	BUG_ON(rq != this_rq());
 	BUG_ON(p == current);
@@ -2485,9 +2484,8 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct 
 			schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_local);
 		}
 		ttwu_activate(p, rq, false, false, true, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
-		success = true;
 	}
-	ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0, success);
+	ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2649,7 +2647,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct
 
 	rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
 	activate_task(rq, p, 0);
-	trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, 1);
+	trace_sched_wakeup_new(p);
 	check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
Index: linux-2.6/include/trace/events/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -54,15 +54,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_kthread_stop_ret,
  */
 DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template,
 
-	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
+	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
 
-	TP_ARGS(p, success),
+	TP_ARGS(p),
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__array(	char,	comm,	TASK_COMM_LEN	)
 		__field(	pid_t,	pid			)
 		__field(	int,	prio			)
-		__field(	int,	success			)
 		__field(	int,	target_cpu		)
 	),
 
@@ -70,25 +69,24 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_templat
 		memcpy(__entry->comm, p->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
 		__entry->pid		= p->pid;
 		__entry->prio		= p->prio;
-		__entry->success	= success;
 		__entry->target_cpu	= task_cpu(p);
 	),
 
-	TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d success=%d target_cpu=%03d",
+	TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d target_cpu=%03d",
 		  __entry->comm, __entry->pid, __entry->prio,
-		  __entry->success, __entry->target_cpu)
+		  __entry->target_cpu)
 );
 
 DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup,
-	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
-	     TP_ARGS(p, success));
+	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
+	     TP_ARGS(p));
 
 /*
  * Tracepoint for waking up a new task:
  */
 DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup_new,
-	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
-	     TP_ARGS(p, success));
+	     TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
+	     TP_ARGS(p));
 
 #ifdef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 static inline long __trace_sched_switch_state(struct task_struct *p)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -399,8 +399,7 @@ static void wakeup_reset(struct trace_ar
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
-static void
-probe_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *p, int success)
+static void probe_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct trace_array_cpu *data;
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
index 8f758d0..bb1ba50 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ tracing_sched_wakeup_trace(struct trace_array *tr,
 }
 
 static void
-probe_sched_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *wakee, int success)
+probe_sched_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *wakee)
 {
 	struct trace_array_cpu *data;
 	unsigned long flags;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-16 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-16 14:56 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched: Always provide p->oncpu Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18  1:03   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mutex: Use p->oncpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 17:34   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 19:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:17       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-16 15:23   ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:45         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:35       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-18  1:05   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18  1:09   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Reduce ttwu rq->lock contention Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:31   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 17:58   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:42   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:32           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17  3:06             ` Yan, Zheng
2010-12-17 13:23               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 16:54             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:43               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:28                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 21:02                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 14:49                   ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-18 20:08                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-19 11:20                       ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-17 18:21                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:50               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 18:24                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:39     ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:45         ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36   ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101216150920.866959114@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.