All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Reduce ttwu rq->lock contention
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:42:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101216184229.GA15889@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101216150920.968046926@chello.nl>

On 12/16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> +static int ttwu_force(struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
> +{
> +	struct rq *rq;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Since we've already set TASK_WAKING this task's CPU cannot
> +	 * change from under us.

I think it can. Yes, we've set TASK_WAKING. But, at least the task
itself can change its state back to TASK_RUNNING without calling
schedule. Say, __wait_event()-like code.

> +static int
> +try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
>  {
> -	int cpu, orig_cpu, this_cpu, success = 0;
> +	int cpu = task_cpu(p);
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned long en_flags = ENQUEUE_WAKEUP;
> -	struct rq *rq;
> +	int success = 0;
> +	int load;
>  
> -	this_cpu = get_cpu();
> -
> -	smp_wmb();
> -	rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
> -	if (!(p->state & state))
> -		goto out;
> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	for (;;) {
> +		unsigned int task_state = p->state;
>  
> -	cpu = task_cpu(p);
> +		if (!(task_state & state))
> +			goto out;

Well, this surely breaks the code like

	CONDITION = true;
	wake_up_process(p);

At least we need mb() before we check task_state the first time.

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-16 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-16 14:56 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched: Always provide p->oncpu Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18  1:03   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mutex: Use p->oncpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 17:34   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 19:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:17       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:23   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:45         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:35       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-18  1:05   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18  1:09   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Reduce ttwu rq->lock contention Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:31   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 17:58   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:42   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-12-16 18:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:32           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17  3:06             ` Yan, Zheng
2010-12-17 13:23               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 16:54             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:43               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:28                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 21:02                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 14:49                   ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-18 20:08                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-19 11:20                       ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-17 18:21                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:50               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 18:24                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:39     ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:45         ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36   ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101216184229.GA15889@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.