From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:23:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101216152351.GB1687@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101216150920.866959114@chello.nl>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 03:56:05PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> try_to_wake_up() would only return a success when it would have to
> place a task on a rq, change that to every time we change p->state to
> TASK_RUNNING, because that's the real measure of wakeups.
>
> This results in that success is always true for the tracepoint, so
> remove its success argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> include/trace/events/sched.h | 18 ++++++++----------
> kernel/sched.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 3 +--
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2327,10 +2327,10 @@ static inline void ttwu_activate(struct
> activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
> }
>
> -static inline void ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> - int wake_flags, bool success)
> +static void
> +ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, int wake_flags)
> {
> - trace_sched_wakeup(p, success);
> + trace_sched_wakeup(p);
> check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
>
> p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> @@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ static inline void ttwu_post_activation(
> }
> #endif
> /* if a worker is waking up, notify workqueue */
> - if ((p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) && success)
> + if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
> wq_worker_waking_up(p, cpu_of(rq));
> }
>
> @@ -2449,9 +2449,9 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> ttwu_activate(p, rq, wake_flags & WF_SYNC, orig_cpu != cpu,
> cpu == this_cpu, en_flags);
> - success = 1;
> out_running:
> - ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags, success);
> + ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags);
> + success = 1;
> out:
> task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
> put_cpu();
> @@ -2470,7 +2470,6 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st
> static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
> - bool success = false;
>
> BUG_ON(rq != this_rq());
> BUG_ON(p == current);
> @@ -2485,9 +2484,8 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct
> schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_local);
> }
> ttwu_activate(p, rq, false, false, true, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
> - success = true;
> }
> - ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0, success);
> + ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -2649,7 +2647,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct
>
> rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
> activate_task(rq, p, 0);
> - trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, 1);
> + trace_sched_wakeup_new(p);
> check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
> Index: linux-2.6/include/trace/events/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/trace/events/sched.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/trace/events/sched.h
> @@ -54,15 +54,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_kthread_stop_ret,
> */
> DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template,
>
> - TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success),
> + TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p),
>
> - TP_ARGS(p, success),
> + TP_ARGS(p),
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
> __field( pid_t, pid )
> __field( int, prio )
> - __field( int, success )
> __field( int, target_cpu )
> ),
>
> @@ -70,25 +69,24 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_templat
> memcpy(__entry->comm, p->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> __entry->pid = p->pid;
> __entry->prio = p->prio;
> - __entry->success = success;
> __entry->target_cpu = task_cpu(p);
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d success=%d target_cpu=%03d",
> + TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d target_cpu=%03d",
> __entry->comm, __entry->pid, __entry->prio,
> - __entry->success, __entry->target_cpu)
> + __entry->target_cpu)
Note we'll need to fix some perf scripts after that. And also perf sched,
probably perf timechart and so on...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-16 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-16 14:56 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched: Always provide p->oncpu Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 1:03 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mutex: Use p->oncpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-12-16 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-18 1:05 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 1:09 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Reduce ttwu rq->lock contention Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 17:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 3:06 ` Yan, Zheng
2010-12-17 13:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 16:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 21:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 14:49 ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-18 20:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-19 11:20 ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-17 18:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:39 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:45 ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101216152351.GB1687@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.