From: "Peter 'p2' De Schrijver" <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
To: ext Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Kevin <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>, Tony <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] OMAP3: PM: Erratum i581 support: dll kick strategy
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:33:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101220113322.GS31404@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=4DJAnXcTZ37rcmr9Kz2CmXx6uhPqNThnoR2gu@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:23:27AM +0100, ext Jean Pihet wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> > From: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
> >
> > Erratum i581 impacts OMAP3 platforms.
> > PRCM DPLL control FSM removes SDRC_IDLEREQ before DPLL3 locks causing
> > the DPLL not to be locked at times.
> >
> > IMPORTANT:
> > *) This is not a complete workaround implementation as recommended
> > by the silicon erratum. this is a support logic for detecting lockups and
> > attempting to recover where possible and is known to provide stability
> > in multiple platforms.
> > *) This code is mostly important for inactive and retention. The ROM code
> > waits for the maximum dll lock time when resuming from off mode. So for
> > off mode this code isn't really needed.
> >
> > This should eventually get refactored as part of cleanups to sleep34xx.S
> >
> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
> > ---
> > (no change done, posting for completeness of the series)
> > v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/365252/
> > typo correction- erratum, support, added comment from Peter from the
> > thread to commit message
> > v1: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129013172525234&w=2
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
> > index 2c20fcf..3fbd1e5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> > OMAP3430_PM_PREPWSTST)
> > #define PM_PWSTCTRL_MPU_P OMAP3430_PRM_BASE + MPU_MOD + OMAP2_PM_PWSTCTRL
> > #define CM_IDLEST1_CORE_V OMAP34XX_CM_REGADDR(CORE_MOD, CM_IDLEST1)
> > +#define CM_IDLEST_CKGEN_V OMAP34XX_CM_REGADDR(PLL_MOD, CM_IDLEST)
> > #define SRAM_BASE_P 0x40200000
> > #define CONTROL_STAT 0x480022F0
> > #define SCRATCHPAD_MEM_OFFS 0x310 /* Move this as correct place is
> > @@ -554,31 +555,67 @@ skip_l2_inval:
> >
> > /* Make sure SDRC accesses are ok */
> > wait_sdrc_ok:
> > +
> > +/* DPLL3 must be locked before accessing the SDRC. Maybe the HW ensures this. */
> > + ldr r4, cm_idlest_ckgen
> > +wait_dpll3_lock:
> > + ldr r5, [r4]
> > + tst r5, #1
> > + beq wait_dpll3_lock
> > +
> > ldr r4, cm_idlest1_core
> > +wait_sdrc_ready:
> > ldr r5, [r4]
> > - and r5, r5, #0x2
> > - cmp r5, #0
> > - bne wait_sdrc_ok
> > + tst r5, #0x2
> > + bne wait_sdrc_ready
> > + /* allow DLL powerdown upon hw idle req */
> > ldr r4, sdrc_power
> > ldr r5, [r4]
> > bic r5, r5, #0x40
> > str r5, [r4]
> > -wait_dll_lock:
> > +is_dll_in_lock_mode:
> > +
> > /* Is dll in lock mode? */
> > ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl
> > ldr r5, [r4]
> > tst r5, #0x4
> > bxne lr
> > /* wait till dll locks */
> > - ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_status
> > +wait_dll_lock_timed:
> > + ldr r4, wait_dll_lock_counter
> > + add r4, r4, #1
> > + str r4, wait_dll_lock_counter
> > + ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_status
> > + mov r6, #8 /* Wait 20uS for lock */
> > +wait_dll_lock:
> > + subs r6, r6, #0x1
> > + beq kick_dll
>
> It would be good to have more comments on the code flow here:
> - what are wait_dll_lock_counter and kick_counter used for?
For debugging and statistics. So you can find out how many times a
'kick' was needed.
> - what is the timing based on? Why 20uS for the wait time?
This is the maximum lock time of the dll according to TI for OMAP3430.
> - jumping back and forth to kick_dll and wait_dll_lock_timed is confusing.
>
> > ldr r5, [r4]
> > and r5, r5, #0x4
> > cmp r5, #0x4
> > bne wait_dll_lock
> > bx lr
> >
> > + /* disable/reenable DLL if not locked */
> > +kick_dll:
> > + ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl
> > + ldr r5, [r4]
> > + mov r6, r5
> > + bic r6, #(1<<3) /* disable dll */
> > + str r6, [r4]
> > + dsb
> > + orr r6, r6, #(1<<3) /* enable dll */
> > + str r6, [r4]
> > + dsb
> > + ldr r4, kick_counter
> > + add r4, r4, #1
> > + str r4, kick_counter
> > + b wait_dll_lock_timed
> > +
> > cm_idlest1_core:
> > .word CM_IDLEST1_CORE_V
> > +cm_idlest_ckgen:
> > + .word CM_IDLEST_CKGEN_V
> > sdrc_dlla_status:
> > .word SDRC_DLLA_STATUS_V
> > sdrc_dlla_ctrl:
> > @@ -615,5 +652,10 @@ control_stat:
> > .word CONTROL_STAT
> > kernel_flush:
> > .word v7_flush_dcache_all
> > + /* these 2 words need to be at the end !!! */
> > +kick_counter:
> > + .word 0
> > +wait_dll_lock_counter:
> > + .word 0
> Why do they need to be at the end? Also, at the end of what do they need to be?
>
At the end of omap34xx_cpu_suspend. As we don't know where in SRAM the
counters will be, the code accessing those counters addresses them
relative from (_omap_sram_idle + omap34xx_cpu_suspend_sz). Not sure if
this part of the code made it to linux-omap though.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-20 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-18 22:53 [PATCH v4 0/7] OMAP: idle path errata fixes Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] OMAP3: PM: Update clean_l2 to use v7_flush_dcache_all Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 6:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 6:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:19 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 10:19 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] OMAP3: PM: Erratum i581 support: dll kick strategy Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 6:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 6:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 14:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 14:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 10:23 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 10:23 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 11:33 ` Peter 'p2' De Schrijver [this message]
2010-12-20 14:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 14:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] omap3: pm: introduce errata handling Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 10:18 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 10:18 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 14:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 14:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i608: disable RTA Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 6:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 6:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 11:23 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 11:23 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 12:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 12:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:27 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 10:27 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 14:45 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 14:45 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] OMAP3630: PM: Disable L2 cache while invalidating L2 cache Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 7:13 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 7:13 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 11:44 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 11:44 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 12:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 12:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 13:08 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 13:08 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 13:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 13:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 13:33 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 13:33 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 13:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 13:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:28 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 10:28 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] OMAP3: PM: make omap3_cpuidle_update_states independent of enable_off_mode Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 7:16 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 7:16 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:28 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 10:28 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable coreoff if < ES1.2 Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 6:51 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 6:51 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:26 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 10:26 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 11:22 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 11:22 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 19:05 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-12-20 19:05 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-12-20 19:07 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 19:07 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] OMAP: idle path errata fixes Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 10:17 ` Jean Pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101220113322.GS31404@nokia.com \
--to=peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.