From: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: shaohui.zheng@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haicheng.li@linux.intel.com,
lethal@linux-sh.org, ak@linux.intel.com, rientjes@google.com,
dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh@suse.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@Sun.COM>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [5/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x86_64
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:34:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101223013410.GA11356@shaohui> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101222162727.56b830b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:27:27PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:31:24 +0800
> > +
> > +ssize_t arch_cpu_probe(const char *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + int nid = 0;
> > + int num = 0, selected = 0;
>
> One definition per line make for more maintainable code.
>
> Two of these initialisations are unnecessary.
>
Agree, I will put them into 2 lines, and remove the initialisations.
I always try to initialize them when we define it, it seems that it is a bad habit.
> > + /* check parameters */
> > + if (!buf || count < 2)
> > + return -EPERM;
> > +
> > + nid = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 0);
>
> checkpatch?
it is a warning, so I ignore it.
I will solve it.
>
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "Add a cpu to node : %d\n", nid);
>
> "Add a CPU to node %d" would make more sense.
>
Get it.
> > + if (nid < 0 || nid > nr_node_ids - 1) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "Invalid NUMA node id: %d (0 <= nid < %d).\n",
> > + nid, nr_node_ids);
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!node_online(nid)) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA node %d is not online, give up.\n", nid);
>
> "giving"
>
Get it.
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* find first uninitialized cpu */
> > + for_each_present_cpu(num) {
>
> s/num/cpu/ would be conventional. "num" is a pretty poor identifier in
> general - it fails to identify what it is counting.
>
I will replace the identifier 'num' with 'cpu'.
> > + if (per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) == NULL) {
> > + selected = num;
>
> Similarly, I'd have used "selected_cpu".
>
Get it.
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (selected >= num_possible_cpus()) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "No free cpu, give up cpu probing.\n");
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* register cpu */
> > + arch_register_cpu_node(selected, nid);
> > + acpi_map_lsapic_emu(selected, nid);
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_cpu_probe);
>
> arch_cpu_probe() is global and exported to modules, but is undocumented.
>
> If it had been documented, I might have been able to work out why arg
> `count' is checked, but never used.
>
Sorry, Andrew, I did not catch it. Do you mean to add the document before
the definition of the function arch_cpu_probe?
> > +ssize_t arch_cpu_release(const char *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + int cpu = 0;
> > +
> > + cpu = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 0);
>
> unneeded initialisation, spurious whitespace, checkpatch.
>
Agree.
> > + /* cpu 0 is not hotplugable */
> > + if (cpu == 0) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "can not release cpu 0.\n");
>
> It's generally better to make kernel messages self-identifying.
> Especially error messages. If someone comes along and sees "can not
> release cpu 0" in their logs, they don't have a clue what caused it
> unless they download the kernel sources and go grepping.
>
How about "arch_cpu_release: can not release cpu 0.\n"?
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "offline cpu %d.\n", cpu);
> > + if (!cpu_down(cpu)) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "fail to offline cpu %d, give up.\n", cpu);
>
> "failed", "giving".
>
Get it.
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + }
> > +
> > + arch_unregister_cpu(cpu);
> > + acpi_unmap_lsapic(cpu);
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_cpu_release);
>
> No documentation.
>
Sorry, It is the same with function arch_cpu_probe, I did not catch the
problem, should I add documentation before the definition or declaration? Or
add the documentation into directory Documentation/.
> > #else /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
> >
> > static int __init arch_register_cpu(int num)
> > @@ -83,8 +158,14 @@
> > register_one_node(i);
> > #endif
> >
> > - for_each_present_cpu(i)
> > - arch_register_cpu(i);
> > + /*
> > + * when cpu hotplug emulation enabled, register the online cpu only,
> > + * the rests are reserved for cpu probe.
> > + */
>
> Something like "When cpu hotplug emulation is enabled, register only
> the online cpu. The remainder are reserved for cpu probing.".
>
>
Get it.
> > + for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> > + if ((cpu_hpe_on && cpu_online(i)) || !cpu_hpe_on)
> > + arch_register_cpu(i);
> > + }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- linux-hpe4.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c 2010-12-10 13:42:34.593331000 +0800
> > +++ linux-hpe4/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c 2010-12-10 14:48:32.143331001 +0800
> > @@ -542,6 +542,14 @@
> > goto err_free_cpumask;
> >
> > sysdev = get_cpu_sysdev(pr->id);
> > + /*
> > + * Reserve cpu for hotplug emulation, the reserved cpu can be hot-added
> > + * throu the cpu probe interface. Return directly.
>
> s/emulation, the/emulation. The/
> s/throu/through/
>
> > + */
> > + if (sysdev == NULL) {
> > + goto out;
> > + }
>
> Unneeded braces.
>
> > if (sysfs_create_link(&device->dev.kobj, &sysdev->kobj, "sysdev")) {
> > result = -EFAULT;
> > goto err_remove_fs;
> > @@ -582,6 +590,7 @@
> > goto err_remove_sysfs;
> > }
> >
> > +out:
> > return 0;
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- linux-hpe4.orig/drivers/base/cpu.c 2010-12-10 14:39:43.333331000 +0800
> > +++ linux-hpe4/drivers/base/cpu.c 2010-12-10 14:48:32.143331001 +0800
> > @@ -22,9 +22,15 @@
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_sysdev_class);
> >
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sys_device *, cpu_sys_devices);
> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sys_device *, cpu_sys_devices);
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > +/*
> > + * cpu_hpe_on is a switch to enable/disable cpu hotplug emulation. it is
>
> s/it/It/.
>
> > + * disabled in default, we can enable it throu grub parameter cpu_hpe=on
>
> "through".
>
> > + */
> > +int cpu_hpe_on;
>
> __read_mostly, perhaps.
>
CPU Hotplug emulation is for debug purpose, so cpu_hpe_on is not used very frequently.
> > static ssize_t show_online(struct sys_device *dev, struct sysdev_attribute *attr,
> > char *buf)
> > {
> >
> > ...
> >
--
Thanks & Regards,
Shaohui
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: shaohui.zheng@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haicheng.li@linux.intel.com,
lethal@linux-sh.org, ak@linux.intel.com, rientjes@google.com,
dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh@suse.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@Sun.COM>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [5/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x86_64
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:34:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101223013410.GA11356@shaohui> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101222162727.56b830b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:27:27PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:31:24 +0800
> > +
> > +ssize_t arch_cpu_probe(const char *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + int nid = 0;
> > + int num = 0, selected = 0;
>
> One definition per line make for more maintainable code.
>
> Two of these initialisations are unnecessary.
>
Agree, I will put them into 2 lines, and remove the initialisations.
I always try to initialize them when we define it, it seems that it is a bad habit.
> > + /* check parameters */
> > + if (!buf || count < 2)
> > + return -EPERM;
> > +
> > + nid = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 0);
>
> checkpatch?
it is a warning, so I ignore it.
I will solve it.
>
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "Add a cpu to node : %d\n", nid);
>
> "Add a CPU to node %d" would make more sense.
>
Get it.
> > + if (nid < 0 || nid > nr_node_ids - 1) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "Invalid NUMA node id: %d (0 <= nid < %d).\n",
> > + nid, nr_node_ids);
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!node_online(nid)) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA node %d is not online, give up.\n", nid);
>
> "giving"
>
Get it.
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* find first uninitialized cpu */
> > + for_each_present_cpu(num) {
>
> s/num/cpu/ would be conventional. "num" is a pretty poor identifier in
> general - it fails to identify what it is counting.
>
I will replace the identifier 'num' with 'cpu'.
> > + if (per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) == NULL) {
> > + selected = num;
>
> Similarly, I'd have used "selected_cpu".
>
Get it.
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (selected >= num_possible_cpus()) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "No free cpu, give up cpu probing.\n");
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* register cpu */
> > + arch_register_cpu_node(selected, nid);
> > + acpi_map_lsapic_emu(selected, nid);
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_cpu_probe);
>
> arch_cpu_probe() is global and exported to modules, but is undocumented.
>
> If it had been documented, I might have been able to work out why arg
> `count' is checked, but never used.
>
Sorry, Andrew, I did not catch it. Do you mean to add the document before
the definition of the function arch_cpu_probe?
> > +ssize_t arch_cpu_release(const char *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + int cpu = 0;
> > +
> > + cpu = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 0);
>
> unneeded initialisation, spurious whitespace, checkpatch.
>
Agree.
> > + /* cpu 0 is not hotplugable */
> > + if (cpu == 0) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "can not release cpu 0.\n");
>
> It's generally better to make kernel messages self-identifying.
> Especially error messages. If someone comes along and sees "can not
> release cpu 0" in their logs, they don't have a clue what caused it
> unless they download the kernel sources and go grepping.
>
How about "arch_cpu_release: can not release cpu 0.\n"?
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "offline cpu %d.\n", cpu);
> > + if (!cpu_down(cpu)) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "fail to offline cpu %d, give up.\n", cpu);
>
> "failed", "giving".
>
Get it.
> > + return -EPERM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + }
> > +
> > + arch_unregister_cpu(cpu);
> > + acpi_unmap_lsapic(cpu);
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_cpu_release);
>
> No documentation.
>
Sorry, It is the same with function arch_cpu_probe, I did not catch the
problem, should I add documentation before the definition or declaration? Or
add the documentation into directory Documentation/.
> > #else /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
> >
> > static int __init arch_register_cpu(int num)
> > @@ -83,8 +158,14 @@
> > register_one_node(i);
> > #endif
> >
> > - for_each_present_cpu(i)
> > - arch_register_cpu(i);
> > + /*
> > + * when cpu hotplug emulation enabled, register the online cpu only,
> > + * the rests are reserved for cpu probe.
> > + */
>
> Something like "When cpu hotplug emulation is enabled, register only
> the online cpu. The remainder are reserved for cpu probing.".
>
>
Get it.
> > + for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> > + if ((cpu_hpe_on && cpu_online(i)) || !cpu_hpe_on)
> > + arch_register_cpu(i);
> > + }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- linux-hpe4.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c 2010-12-10 13:42:34.593331000 +0800
> > +++ linux-hpe4/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c 2010-12-10 14:48:32.143331001 +0800
> > @@ -542,6 +542,14 @@
> > goto err_free_cpumask;
> >
> > sysdev = get_cpu_sysdev(pr->id);
> > + /*
> > + * Reserve cpu for hotplug emulation, the reserved cpu can be hot-added
> > + * throu the cpu probe interface. Return directly.
>
> s/emulation, the/emulation. The/
> s/throu/through/
>
> > + */
> > + if (sysdev == NULL) {
> > + goto out;
> > + }
>
> Unneeded braces.
>
> > if (sysfs_create_link(&device->dev.kobj, &sysdev->kobj, "sysdev")) {
> > result = -EFAULT;
> > goto err_remove_fs;
> > @@ -582,6 +590,7 @@
> > goto err_remove_sysfs;
> > }
> >
> > +out:
> > return 0;
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- linux-hpe4.orig/drivers/base/cpu.c 2010-12-10 14:39:43.333331000 +0800
> > +++ linux-hpe4/drivers/base/cpu.c 2010-12-10 14:48:32.143331001 +0800
> > @@ -22,9 +22,15 @@
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_sysdev_class);
> >
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sys_device *, cpu_sys_devices);
> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sys_device *, cpu_sys_devices);
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > +/*
> > + * cpu_hpe_on is a switch to enable/disable cpu hotplug emulation. it is
>
> s/it/It/.
>
> > + * disabled in default, we can enable it throu grub parameter cpu_hpe=on
>
> "through".
>
> > + */
> > +int cpu_hpe_on;
>
> __read_mostly, perhaps.
>
CPU Hotplug emulation is for debug purpose, so cpu_hpe_on is not used very frequently.
> > static ssize_t show_online(struct sys_device *dev, struct sysdev_attribute *attr,
> > char *buf)
> > {
> >
> > ...
> >
--
Thanks & Regards,
Shaohui
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-23 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-10 7:31 [0/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator (v9) shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` [1/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Documentation shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` [2/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Add numa=possible option shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` shaohui.zheng
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 1:14 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-23 1:14 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-10 7:31 ` [3/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Add node hotplug emulation shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` shaohui.zheng
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 1:38 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-23 1:38 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-23 2:20 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 2:20 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-28 7:34 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28 7:34 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28 7:34 ` [patch] mm: add " David Rientjes
2010-12-28 7:34 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-29 2:31 ` [3/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Add " Zheng, Shaohui
2010-12-29 2:31 ` Zheng, Shaohui
2010-12-10 7:31 ` [4/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Abstract cpu register functions shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` [5/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x86_64 shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` shaohui.zheng
2010-12-16 16:25 ` Eric B Munson
2010-12-16 23:34 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-16 23:34 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 1:34 ` Shaohui Zheng [this message]
2010-12-23 1:34 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-23 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 2:24 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-23 2:24 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-23 5:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 5:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 4:30 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-23 4:30 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` [6/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Fake CPU socket with logical CPU on x86 shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` shaohui.zheng
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 5:10 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-23 5:10 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` [7/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Implement per-node add_memory debugfs interface shaohui.zheng
2010-12-10 7:31 ` shaohui.zheng
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-23 2:00 ` Shaohui Zheng
2010-12-23 2:00 ` Shaohui Zheng
2011-02-22 22:31 ` [0/7, v9] NUMA Hotplug Emulator (v9) David Rientjes
2011-02-22 22:31 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-23 3:29 ` Haicheng Li
2011-02-23 3:29 ` Haicheng Li
2011-02-23 5:29 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2011-02-23 5:29 ` Zhang, Yang Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101223013410.GA11356@shaohui \
--to=shaohui.zheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Yinghai.Lu@Sun.COM \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=haicheng.li@intel.com \
--cc=haicheng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.