Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window to enhance ondemand governor power efficiency

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Youquan Song <youquan.song@linux.intel.com>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>,
	davej@redhat.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, venki@google.com,
	arjan@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window to enhance ondemand governor power efficiency
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:06:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101224030627.GA9850@linux-youquan.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101223110020.GC18363@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>

> Interesting approach, but seems to be quite different from what "ondemand"
> does at the moment. And, as David Niemi pointed out, it seems to be more
> Intel-specific. Therefore, what do you think about adding this different
> algorithm as a different governor, and keep the "ondemand" algorithm more or
> less as it is?

Good suggestion! I will write a different governor soon if nobody
oppose.

Thanks
-Youquan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: Youquan Song <youquan.song@linux.intel.com>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>,
	davej@redhat.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, venki@google.com,
	arjan@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, kent.liu@intel.com,
	chaohong.guo@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window to enhance ondemand governor power efficiency
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:06:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101224030627.GA9850@linux-youquan.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101223110020.GC18363@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>

> Interesting approach, but seems to be quite different from what "ondemand"
> does at the moment. And, as David Niemi pointed out, it seems to be more
> Intel-specific. Therefore, what do you think about adding this different
> algorithm as a different governor, and keep the "ondemand" algorithm more or
> less as it is?

Good suggestion! I will write a different governor soon if nobody
oppose.

Thanks
-Youquan

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-24  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-23  6:23 [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window to enhance ondemand governor power efficiency Youquan Song
2010-12-23  6:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window for ondemand governor Youquan Song
2010-12-23  6:23   ` [PATCH 2/6] cpufreq: Add sampling_window tunable Youquan Song
2010-12-23  6:23     ` [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: Add roll back non-sampling_window Youquan Song
2010-12-23  6:23       ` [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: Add dynamic sampling window tunable Youquan Song
2010-12-23  6:23         ` [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: Add down_differential tunable Youquan Song
2010-12-23  6:23           ` [PATCH 6/6] cpufreq: Evaluate P1 before enter turbo mode Youquan Song
2010-12-23 10:57             ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-12-23 14:38               ` Matthew Garrett
2010-12-23 14:38                 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-12-23 18:13                 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-23 20:48                   ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-12-23  6:50 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window to enhance ondemand governor power efficiency Niemi, David
2010-12-23 23:26   ` Youquan Song
2010-12-23 11:00 ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-12-23 17:34   ` Dave Jones
2010-12-23 17:34     ` Dave Jones
2010-12-23 20:51     ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-12-23 20:51     ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-12-23 20:51       ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-12-25  4:24       ` James Cloos
2010-12-23 17:34   ` Dave Jones
2010-12-24  3:06   ` Youquan Song
2010-12-24  3:06   ` Youquan Song [this message]
2010-12-24  3:06     ` Youquan Song
2010-12-23 14:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-12-24  4:28   ` Youquan Song
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-23  6:17 Youquan Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101224030627.GA9850@linux-youquan.bj.intel.com \
    --to=youquan.song@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel. \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    --cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.