From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2@ti.com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce hardware spinlock framework
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:19:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110104121921.3550dcfa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikLuu+njQA_PRmS_q8zs_xpB2gsqh3oZQJkB_Cm@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:23:20 +0200
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> [101216 13:34]:
> >> Tony, Andrew, can you please have a look ?
> >>
> >> Any comment or suggestion is appreciated.
> >
> > Looks sane to me from omap point of view and it seems the locks
> > are now all timeout based:
> >
> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
> Can you please have a look at this patch set (see link no. [1] below) ?
I looked - it looks reasonable. This is exactly the wrong time to be
looking at large new patchsets - please refresh, retest and resend
after -rc1 is released?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce hardware spinlock framework
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:19:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110104121921.3550dcfa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikLuu+njQA_PRmS_q8zs_xpB2gsqh3oZQJkB_Cm@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:23:20 +0200
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> [101216 13:34]:
> >> Tony, Andrew, can you please have a look ?
> >>
> >> Any comment or suggestion is appreciated.
> >
> > Looks sane to me from omap point of view and it seems the locks
> > are now all timeout based:
> >
> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
> Can you please have a look at this patch set (see link no. [1] below) ?
I looked - it looks reasonable. This is exactly the wrong time to be
looking at large new patchsets - please refresh, retest and resend
after -rc1 is released?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-03 23:50 [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce hardware spinlock framework Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add framework Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add OMAP implementation Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] OMAP4: hwmod data: Add hwspinlock Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: add hwspinlock device Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-03 23:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-04 0:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce hardware spinlock framework David Daney
2010-12-04 1:28 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-04 1:28 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-04 1:28 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-14 14:31 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-14 14:31 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-14 17:06 ` Greg KH
2010-12-14 17:06 ` Greg KH
2010-12-14 18:40 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-14 18:40 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-16 20:42 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-16 20:42 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-16 20:42 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-16 21:08 ` Greg KH
2010-12-16 21:08 ` Greg KH
2010-12-16 21:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-16 21:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-12-18 0:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-12-18 0:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-04 12:23 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-01-04 12:23 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-01-04 20:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-01-04 20:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-04 20:42 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-01-04 20:42 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110104121921.3550dcfa.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=h-kanigeri2@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.