* [lm-sensors] LM94
@ 2011-01-15 18:35 Anish Patel
2011-01-16 6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-01-16 10:02 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anish Patel @ 2011-01-15 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 163 bytes --]
Hello All,
I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command
/echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device
/Thanks
Anish
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 487 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] LM94
2011-01-15 18:35 [lm-sensors] LM94 Anish Patel
@ 2011-01-16 6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-01-16 10:02 ` Jean Delvare
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2011-01-16 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:35:06PM -0500, Anish Patel wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command
> echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device
>
I thought about adding the LM94 IDs to the LM93 driver. Problem is that
the driver does not support the extended features of LM94, so I am not sure
if that would be a good idea.
Thoughts anyone ?
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] LM94
2011-01-15 18:35 [lm-sensors] LM94 Anish Patel
2011-01-16 6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2011-01-16 10:02 ` Jean Delvare
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2011-01-16 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:58:06 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:35:06PM -0500, Anish Patel wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command
> > echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device
> >
> I thought about adding the LM94 IDs to the LM93 driver. Problem is that
> the driver does not support the extended features of LM94, so I am not sure
> if that would be a good idea.
>
> Thoughts anyone ?
As long as the current set of features supported by the lm93 driver
work OK with the LM94, I have no objection (and would even encourage
it). Anybody interested in the extra features can add them later. You
can simply have the driver print a notice at bind time that some
features are unsupported.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-16 10:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-15 18:35 [lm-sensors] LM94 Anish Patel
2011-01-16 6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-01-16 10:02 ` Jean Delvare
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.