All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [lm-sensors] LM94
@ 2011-01-15 18:35 Anish Patel
  2011-01-16  6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
  2011-01-16 10:02 ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anish Patel @ 2011-01-15 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 163 bytes --]

Hello All,

I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command
/echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device


/Thanks
Anish



[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 487 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] LM94
  2011-01-15 18:35 [lm-sensors] LM94 Anish Patel
@ 2011-01-16  6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
  2011-01-16 10:02 ` Jean Delvare
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2011-01-16  6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:35:06PM -0500, Anish Patel wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command
> echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device
> 
I thought about adding the LM94 IDs to the LM93 driver. Problem is that
the driver does not support the extended features of LM94, so I am not sure
if that would be a good idea.

Thoughts anyone ?

Guenter


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] LM94
  2011-01-15 18:35 [lm-sensors] LM94 Anish Patel
  2011-01-16  6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2011-01-16 10:02 ` Jean Delvare
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2011-01-16 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:58:06 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:35:06PM -0500, Anish Patel wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > 
> > I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command
> > echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device
> > 
> I thought about adding the LM94 IDs to the LM93 driver. Problem is that
> the driver does not support the extended features of LM94, so I am not sure
> if that would be a good idea.
> 
> Thoughts anyone ?

As long as the current set of features supported by the lm93 driver
work OK with the LM94, I have no objection (and would even encourage
it). Anybody interested in the extra features can add them later. You
can simply have the driver print a notice at bind time that some
features are unsupported.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-16 10:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-15 18:35 [lm-sensors] LM94 Anish Patel
2011-01-16  6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-01-16 10:02 ` Jean Delvare

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.