All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: Hide CONFIG_PM from users
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:18:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110208111827.GA29850@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimh=8pSmQ6i-5H5+agSso7dCOcOrUJ6Uq_fu7nh@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:17:59PM -0800, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Mark Brown

> > I'm rather hoping that they'll notice the mailing list thread or that
> > someone else who knows what's going on with them does

> Surely you're joking. I mean, do _you_ scan every message that comes
> through lkml and its various sister lists?

Actually I do at least scan most of the lists.

> Do a git blame and add them to the CC:. It's the polite thing to do.

It's also going to result in the mail not going to the mailing lists as
there's a limit on the number of people you can CC enforced by vger
which probably isn't constructive.  It's moot now but as I said in the
text you've helpfully cut I'd have suggested contacting them after the
thread had come to a conclusion.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: Hide CONFIG_PM from users
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:18:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110208111827.GA29850@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimh=8pSmQ6i-5H5+agSso7dCOcOrUJ6Uq_fu7nh@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:17:59PM -0800, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Mark Brown

> > I'm rather hoping that they'll notice the mailing list thread or that
> > someone else who knows what's going on with them does

> Surely you're joking. I mean, do _you_ scan every message that comes
> through lkml and its various sister lists?

Actually I do at least scan most of the lists.

> Do a git blame and add them to the CC:. It's the polite thing to do.

It's also going to result in the mail not going to the mailing lists as
there's a limit on the number of people you can CC enforced by vger
which probably isn't constructive.  It's moot now but as I said in the
text you've helpfully cut I'd have suggested contacting them after the
thread had come to a conclusion.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-08 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 139+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-07 12:22 [PATCH] PM: Hide CONFIG_PM from users Mark Brown
2011-02-07 12:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-07 12:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-07 13:26   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 13:26   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-07 13:09   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 13:09   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-07 14:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 14:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 14:13   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 14:13   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 14:18   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 14:18     ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 14:44     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 14:44     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 14:44       ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 14:50       ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 14:50       ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 14:50         ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 15:00         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-07 15:00         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-07 15:00           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-07 15:00           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-07 15:10           ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 15:10             ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 15:19             ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 15:19               ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 15:21               ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 15:21               ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 15:21                 ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 15:36                 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-07 15:36                   ` Alan Stern
2011-02-07 15:36                   ` Alan Stern
2011-02-07 15:49                   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 15:49                     ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 19:16                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 19:16                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 19:16                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08  1:17                     ` Ray Lee
2011-02-08  1:17                       ` Ray Lee
2011-02-08 11:18                       ` Mark Brown
2011-02-08 11:18                       ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-02-08 11:18                         ` Mark Brown
2011-02-08  1:17                     ` Ray Lee
2011-02-07 15:49                   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 15:36                 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-07 15:19             ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 15:10           ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-07 14:18   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 19:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 19:30   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 19:46     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 20:18       ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 20:18       ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 21:15         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 21:47           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-07 22:00             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 22:00             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 22:23               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-07 22:23               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-07 23:05                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 23:05                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08  0:50                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08  9:23                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08  9:23                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08  0:50                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08 16:48                   ` Paul Mundt
2011-02-08 16:48                   ` Paul Mundt
2011-02-07 21:47           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08 12:12           ` Mark Brown
2011-02-08 12:12           ` Mark Brown
2011-02-08 12:21           ` [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_PM altogether, enable power management all the time Ingo Molnar
2011-02-08 21:18             ` [PATCH 0/5] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:20               ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPI / PM: Move references to pm_flags into sleep.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 23:40                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-08 23:40                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09  0:37                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-09  0:37                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-09  1:04                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09  1:04                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-08 21:20               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:21               ` [PATCH 2/5] PM: Make CONFIG_PM depend on (CONFIG_PM_SLEEP || CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:21                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:21               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:21               ` [PATCH 3/5] PM: Reorder power management Kconfig options Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:21               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:22               ` [PATCH 4/5] PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_OPS with CONFIG_PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:22               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:23               ` [PATCH 5/5] PM: Clean up Kconfig dependencies Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 23:43                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-08 23:43                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-10 23:32                 ` [Updated][PATCH 5/5] PM: Clean up PM_TRACE dependencies and drop unnecessary Kconfig option Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-10 23:32                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:23               ` [PATCH 5/5] PM: Clean up Kconfig dependencies Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 21:18             ` [PATCH 0/5] Re: Remove CONFIG_PM altogether, enable power management all the time Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 23:35             ` [PATCH] " Frank Rowand
2011-02-08 23:35               ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-09 11:41               ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 11:41               ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 11:58                 ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 11:58                 ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 17:07                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-09 17:07                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-09 18:31                   ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-09 18:40                     ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 19:00                       ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-09 19:00                       ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-09 19:25                         ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 19:53                           ` Tim Bird
2011-02-09 19:53                           ` Tim Bird
2011-02-09 19:59                             ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 20:09                               ` Alan Stern
2011-02-09 20:09                               ` Alan Stern
2011-02-09 20:10                                 ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 20:10                                 ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 19:59                             ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 19:25                         ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 18:40                     ` Mark Brown
2011-02-09 18:31                   ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-08 23:35             ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-08 23:35             ` Tim Bird
2011-02-08 23:35             ` Tim Bird
2011-02-09  2:41               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-09  2:41               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-08 12:21           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-07 21:15         ` [PATCH] PM: Hide CONFIG_PM from users Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 19:46     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-07 19:30   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-07 19:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08  2:52 ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-08  2:52   ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-08 14:15   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-08 14:15   ` Mark Brown
2011-02-08  2:52 ` Frank Rowand
2011-02-08 14:29 ` Pavel Machek
2011-02-08 14:29 ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-07 12:22 Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110208111827.GA29850@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.