All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"geert@linux-m68k.org" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org" <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:00:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110223150047.GC13204@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikd9QJZVoN+N4yLfr+Y+GWkB1EvShrgvb39Fp=0@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:47:09PM +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> wrote:
> > True, at least until I've made sure that there isn't any
> > underlying reason for CRISv32 to put __param in a different place...
> >
> > Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
> 
> I really am not going to apply a patch that likely just adds another
> redundant field to the linker scripts. So the ack I'm just ignoring,

:-)

> But it would be good to get the "remove the legacy __param thing
> because it's already there from the asm-generic version" confirmed by
> testing, and not just looking at the source code.

Testing shows no problems with the below patch.

From f8c17a94940a012f237986b4f40ca557a88f9019 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jesper Nilsson <jespern@axis.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:04:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Drop redundant __param section for CRISv32.

The __param section is already brought in by RODATA above.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
---
 arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S |    5 -----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 917b727..e8adc35 100644
--- a/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -75,11 +75,6 @@ SECTIONS
 	INIT_TEXT_SECTION(PAGE_SIZE)
 	.init.data : { INIT_DATA }
 	.init.setup : { INIT_SETUP(16) }
-#ifdef CONFIG_ETRAX_ARCH_V32
-	__start___param = .;
-	__param : { *(__param) }
-	__stop___param = .;
-#endif
 	.initcall.init : {
 		INIT_CALLS
 	}
-- 
1.7.4

>                      Linus

/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
-- 
               Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"geert@linux-m68k.org" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org" <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:00:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110223150047.GC13204@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikd9QJZVoN+N4yLfr+Y+GWkB1EvShrgvb39Fp=0@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:47:09PM +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> wrote:
> > True, at least until I've made sure that there isn't any
> > underlying reason for CRISv32 to put __param in a different place...
> >
> > Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
> 
> I really am not going to apply a patch that likely just adds another
> redundant field to the linker scripts. So the ack I'm just ignoring,

:-)

> But it would be good to get the "remove the legacy __param thing
> because it's already there from the asm-generic version" confirmed by
> testing, and not just looking at the source code.

Testing shows no problems with the below patch.

>From f8c17a94940a012f237986b4f40ca557a88f9019 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jesper Nilsson <jespern@axis.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:04:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Drop redundant __param section for CRISv32.

The __param section is already brought in by RODATA above.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
---
 arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S |    5 -----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 917b727..e8adc35 100644
--- a/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -75,11 +75,6 @@ SECTIONS
 	INIT_TEXT_SECTION(PAGE_SIZE)
 	.init.data : { INIT_DATA }
 	.init.setup : { INIT_SETUP(16) }
-#ifdef CONFIG_ETRAX_ARCH_V32
-	__start___param = .;
-	__param : { *(__param) }
-	__stop___param = .;
-#endif
 	.initcall.init : {
 		INIT_CALLS
 	}
-- 
1.7.4

>                      Linus

/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
-- 
               Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-23 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-08  0:02 [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08  0:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module parameters Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08  0:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] module: do not hide __modver_version_show declaration behind ifdef Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08 21:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-08 21:12   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-17 12:43   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-17 12:43     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module parameters Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-11 22:03   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-13 23:04   ` Rusty Russell
2011-02-17 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 17:31   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 17:31     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 17:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 18:00       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 18:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 21:01           ` David Miller
2011-02-17 21:11             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 21:17               ` David Miller
2011-02-17 21:54                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 22:01                   ` David Miller
2011-02-17 22:19                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 22:23                       ` David Miller
2011-02-17 22:48                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 23:08                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 23:19                             ` David Miller
2011-02-19  0:14                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-21  4:00                               ` Rusty Russell
2011-02-21  7:38                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-21  7:49                                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-21  7:49                                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-21 13:25                                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-22  1:58                                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-22  2:03                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-22  7:02                                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-22  7:02                                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-22 17:08                                       ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-02-22 20:47                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-23 15:00                                           ` Jesper Nilsson [this message]
2011-02-23 15:00                                             ` Jesper Nilsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110223150047.GC13204@axis.com \
    --to=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dtor@vmware.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=starvik@axis.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.