All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:43:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302104336.GA26381@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110302100400.GK19669@htj.dyndns.org>


* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> >From dcd414c795a28fff6e511d58e4cfd1202323c703 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:54:10 +0100

Btw., given that you basically took most of Yinghai's fixes, wouldnt it be better to 
have this as a 'From: Yinghai' commit, with -v2 comments about minor updates you 
did?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-02 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24 14:51 [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] Tejun Heo
2011-02-24 14:52 ` [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] bootmem,x86: cleanup changes Tejun Heo
2011-02-24 19:08 ` [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] Yinghai Lu
2011-02-24 19:23   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-24 19:28     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-24 19:32       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-24 19:46         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-24 22:46           ` [patch] x86, mm: Fix size of numa_distance array David Rientjes
2011-02-24 23:30             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-24 23:31             ` David Rientjes
2011-02-25  9:05               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25  9:03             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 10:58               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 11:05                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25  9:11             ` [PATCH x86-mm] x86-64, NUMA: " Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 17:18       ` [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] David Rientjes
2011-03-01 18:25         ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 22:19         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02  9:17           ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:04         ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:07           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 10:15             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:36               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 10:25           ` [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:39             ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Better explain numa_distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:42               ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 14:31                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-02 14:30             ` [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling David Rientjes
2011-03-02 15:42               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 21:12                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 21:36                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-03 20:07                     ` David Rientjes
2011-03-04 14:32                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-03 20:04                   ` David Rientjes
2011-03-03 20:00                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-04 15:31               ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't assume phys node 0 is always online in numa_emulation() handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-04 21:33                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-05  7:50                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-05 15:50               ` [tip:x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't assume phys node 0 is always online in numa_emulation() tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 16:16             ` [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 16:37               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 16:46                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 16:55                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 18:52                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 19:02                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 19:06                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 19:13                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 20:32                             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 20:57                               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 21:14                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-03  6:17                                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-10 18:46                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11  8:29                                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11  8:33                                         ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 15:48                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 15:54                                             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 18:02                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 18:19                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 18:25                                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 18:29                                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 18:45                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11  9:31                                         ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't call numa_set_distanc() for all possible node combinations during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 15:42                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 16:03                                             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 19:05                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 10:43           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-03-02 10:53             ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:59               ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110302104336.GA26381@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.