All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:08:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D66AC9C.6080500@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110224145128.GM7840@htj.dyndns.org>

On 02/24/2011 06:51 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Ingo, please pull from the following git branch to receive four
> commits from Yinghai.  HEAD is d1b19426b0 (x86: Rename e820_table_* to
> pgt_buf_*).
> 
> The first three separate nobootmem code into mm/nobootmem.c and the
> last one renames e820_table_* variables to pgt_buf_*.  All four
> patches are cleanups and shouldn't cause any behavior difference.
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git x86-mm
> 
> As usual, if HEAD doesn't appear, please pull from master.
> 
>   ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git x86-mm
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Yinghai Lu (4):
>       bootmem: Separate out CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM code into nobootmem.c
>       bootmem: Move contig_page_data definition to bootmem.c/nobootmem.c
>       bootmem: Move __alloc_memory_core_early() to nobootmem.c
>       x86: Rename e820_table_* to pgt_buf_*
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/init.h |    6 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/init.c          |   20 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/init_32.c       |    8 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c       |    4 +-
>  arch/x86/xen/mmu.c          |    2 +-
>  include/linux/mm.h          |    2 -
>  mm/Makefile                 |    8 +-
>  mm/bootmem.c                |  180 +-----------------
>  mm/nobootmem.c              |  435 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/page_alloc.c             |   37 ----
>  10 files changed, 472 insertions(+), 230 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 mm/nobootmem.c
> 

better to put first three into seperate branch. and it is with core code.
something like tip/mm

So will not pollute tip/x86/mm. and they can be pushed separately.

Thanks

Yinghai

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24 14:51 [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] Tejun Heo
2011-02-24 14:52 ` [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] bootmem,x86: cleanup changes Tejun Heo
2011-02-24 19:08 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2011-02-24 19:23   ` [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] Ingo Molnar
2011-02-24 19:28     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-24 19:32       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-24 19:46         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-24 22:46           ` [patch] x86, mm: Fix size of numa_distance array David Rientjes
2011-02-24 23:30             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-24 23:31             ` David Rientjes
2011-02-25  9:05               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25  9:03             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 10:58               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 11:05                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25  9:11             ` [PATCH x86-mm] x86-64, NUMA: " Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 17:18       ` [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] David Rientjes
2011-03-01 18:25         ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 22:19         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02  9:17           ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:04         ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:07           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 10:15             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:36               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 10:25           ` [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:39             ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Better explain numa_distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:42               ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 14:31                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-02 14:30             ` [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling David Rientjes
2011-03-02 15:42               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 21:12                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 21:36                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-03 20:07                     ` David Rientjes
2011-03-04 14:32                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-03 20:04                   ` David Rientjes
2011-03-03 20:00                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-04 15:31               ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't assume phys node 0 is always online in numa_emulation() handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-04 21:33                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-05  7:50                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-05 15:50               ` [tip:x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't assume phys node 0 is always online in numa_emulation() tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 16:16             ` [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 16:37               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 16:46                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 16:55                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 18:52                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 19:02                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 19:06                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 19:13                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 20:32                             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 20:57                               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 21:14                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-03  6:17                                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-10 18:46                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11  8:29                                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11  8:33                                         ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 15:48                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 15:54                                             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 18:02                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 18:19                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 18:25                                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 18:29                                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 18:45                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11  9:31                                         ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't call numa_set_distanc() for all possible node combinations during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 15:42                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 16:03                                             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 19:05                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 10:43           ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 10:53             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:59               ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D66AC9C.6080500@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.