All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: IIO comments
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:54:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201103171854.52777.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D823AF8.8070408@cam.ac.uk>

On Thursday 17 March 2011 17:46:48 Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > 
> > Since I haven't fully understood the distinction between the
> > three chardevs, it may of course turn out a bad idea, but I
> > think it would simplify the core code if you could assume
> > that every iio device has exactly one chardev interface,
> > so you could give them the same unique number and manage
> > the life time together.
>
> It simplifies that corner, but I'm a little worried that it
> will add a lot of interlinks between the currently fairly
> disconnected elements that go through a character device.
> 
> If we can keep those links to a minimum (which I think
> we can, but haven't tried yet!) it will be a sensible move.

Let's first work out how a single event buffer should work
using read and poll, as discussed in the other thread.
Once we have sorted that out, this may become a lot clearer.

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-17 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-15 21:15 IIO comments Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 11:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-16 13:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 14:50     ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-16 15:09       ` Guenter Roeck
2011-03-16 15:15       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 15:33         ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 13:24           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 16:47             ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 17:51               ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 18:33                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-18 12:47                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 16:06                     ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-18 16:18                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 16:29                         ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-18 16:57                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 17:51                             ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 13:47       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 14:42         ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 15:03           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 16:46             ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 16:47               ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 17:54               ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-03-16 16:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-16 18:52     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201103171854.52777.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
    --cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.