From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: IIO comments
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:57:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201103181757.58218.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D83885C.3050402@cam.ac.uk>
On Friday 18 March 2011, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > I guess if it's always in${i}-in${i+1}, it's still not too hard.
> I think they have been so far, but doubt this is universal.
> How about having a diff type and just having a pair of indices in the
> channel structure? Actually may need a third for x^2+y^2+z^2 devices.
> (iirc there are parts that do x^2+y^2 despite also having a z channel)
> ...
If two identifiers are common, that would probably be fine.
If you have a x^2+y^2+z^2 device, it might be easier to call that
a different type with a fixed name, as long as there is a small
number of combinations.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-15 21:15 IIO comments Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 11:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-16 13:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 14:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-16 15:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-03-16 15:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 13:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 16:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 17:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 18:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-18 12:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 16:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-18 16:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 16:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-18 16:57 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-03-18 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 13:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 14:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 15:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 16:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 16:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 17:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 16:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-16 18:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201103181757.58218.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.