From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:20:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110412062002.GA31050@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110412140040.3020ef55.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> kernel/sched.c:7140: error: 'cpu_coregroup_mask' undeclared here (not in a function)
>
> Caused by commit 2c402dc3bb50 ("sched: Unify the sched_domain build
> functions"). On sparc64, cpu_coregroup_mask is a #define, not a function.
>
> I applied tha patch below (idea stolen from s390) whcih could probably be
> better.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:51:32 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix sparc64 for sched_domain changes
>
> Fixes this compile error:
>
> kernel/sched.c:7140: error: 'cpu_coregroup_mask' undeclared here (not in a function)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h
> index 1c79f32..16f477d 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ static inline int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *pbus)
> #define smt_capable() (sparc64_multi_core)
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> -#define cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu) (&cpu_core_map[cpu])
> +extern cpumask_t cpu_core_map[NR_CPUS];
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> + return &cpu_core_map[cpu];
> +}
Dave, if this change is fine with you i'd like to queue it up in
tip:sched/domains.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-12 4:00 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-12 6:20 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-04-12 6:25 ` David Miller
2011-04-12 7:40 ` [tip:sched/domains] sched, sparc64: Turn cpu_coregroup_mask() into a real function tip-bot for Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-29 2:50 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-29 22:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-07 1:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-22 2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-22 22:00 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-29 2:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-29 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 14:30 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-07 1:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-07 15:37 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-14 5:49 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-14 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-13 14:29 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 6:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 6:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-16 7:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-16 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-16 9:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-16 7:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 7:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-16 7:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-13 14:06 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-13 19:17 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-02 16:23 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-02 16:28 ` Russell King
2010-08-02 16:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-03 1:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-03 1:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-03 3:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-03 4:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-03 5:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-02 16:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-03 1:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-23 16:31 Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-23 16:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-23 23:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-24 0:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-23 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110412062002.GA31050@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.