From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"George Kashperko" <george@znau.edu.ua>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Russell King" <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, "Michael Büsch" <mb@bu3sch.de>,
linuxdriverproject <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"Andy Botting" <andy@andybotting.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Larry Finger" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH V3] axi: add AXI bus driver
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:14:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110412151453.GA20978@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=cG3U8yXaQ6PusmNaWcr+AWv3e_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:41:18AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > You can't do that, no static struct devices please. Make these dynamic
> > and everything will be fine. The -mm tree used to have a huge warning
> > if you ever tried to register a statically allocated struct, but that
> > didn't really work out, but would have saved you a lot of time here,
> > sorry.
> >
> > So dynamically allocate the structures and you will be fine.
>
> Well, I saw that along kernel, I had no idea there is anything wrong
> about this. It seems more ppl do not know about this:
> struct radeon_ib ibs[RADEON_IB_POOL_SIZE];
> struct radeon_pm_clock_info clock_info[8];
> struct radeon_pm_profile profiles[PM_PROFILE_MAX];
> struct radeon_surface_reg surface_regs[RADEON_GEM_MAX_SURFACES];
Are you sure these are all containing a 'struct device'?
> struct radeon_i2c_chan *i2c_bus[RADEON_MAX_I2C_BUS];
This is an array of pointers, that's fine.
> struct b43_key key[B43_NR_GROUP_KEYS * 2 + B43_NR_PAIRWISE_KEYS];
This contains a 'struct device'?
> struct ssb_device devices[SSB_MAX_NR_CORES];
> I guess I could fine more examples by simple grepping .h files.
Then all of the above should be fixed.
> Is there some guide around with things like this we should avoid?
Yes, do not statically allocate a 'struct device'.
> checkpatch does no catch this, so maybe just some manual? Could you
> point me to it?
It's a structure that has dynamic lifetime rules, you can't statically
allocate it safely. It's that simple.
Please fix this.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH V3] axi: add AXI bus driver
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:14:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110412151453.GA20978@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=cG3U8yXaQ6PusmNaWcr+AWv3e_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:41:18AM +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> > You can't do that, no static struct devices please. ?Make these dynamic
> > and everything will be fine. ?The -mm tree used to have a huge warning
> > if you ever tried to register a statically allocated struct, but that
> > didn't really work out, but would have saved you a lot of time here,
> > sorry.
> >
> > So dynamically allocate the structures and you will be fine.
>
> Well, I saw that along kernel, I had no idea there is anything wrong
> about this. It seems more ppl do not know about this:
> struct radeon_ib ibs[RADEON_IB_POOL_SIZE];
> struct radeon_pm_clock_info clock_info[8];
> struct radeon_pm_profile profiles[PM_PROFILE_MAX];
> struct radeon_surface_reg surface_regs[RADEON_GEM_MAX_SURFACES];
Are you sure these are all containing a 'struct device'?
> struct radeon_i2c_chan *i2c_bus[RADEON_MAX_I2C_BUS];
This is an array of pointers, that's fine.
> struct b43_key key[B43_NR_GROUP_KEYS * 2 + B43_NR_PAIRWISE_KEYS];
This contains a 'struct device'?
> struct ssb_device devices[SSB_MAX_NR_CORES];
> I guess I could fine more examples by simple grepping .h files.
Then all of the above should be fixed.
> Is there some guide around with things like this we should avoid?
Yes, do not statically allocate a 'struct device'.
> checkpatch does no catch this, so maybe just some manual? Could you
> point me to it?
It's a structure that has dynamic lifetime rules, you can't statically
allocate it safely. It's that simple.
Please fix this.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-11 21:25 [RFC][PATCH V3] axi: add AXI bus driver Rafał Miłecki
2011-07-08 18:29 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:25 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:06 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 21:06 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 21:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:25 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 21:25 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 21:36 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:36 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:36 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:56 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 21:56 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 22:12 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 22:12 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 22:12 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 22:36 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 22:36 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 22:45 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 22:45 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 22:45 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 23:35 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 23:35 ` Greg KH
2011-04-12 5:41 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 5:41 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 5:41 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 11:40 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 11:40 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 11:40 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 15:16 ` Greg KH
2011-04-12 15:16 ` Greg KH
2011-04-12 15:14 ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-04-12 15:14 ` Greg KH
2011-04-12 15:25 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 15:25 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 15:25 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:07 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 21:07 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 23:44 ` Joe Perches
2011-04-11 23:44 ` Joe Perches
2011-04-12 5:52 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 5:52 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 5:52 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110412151453.GA20978@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=andy@andybotting.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=george@znau.edu.ua \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.