From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] writeback: trace balance_dirty_pages
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 21:25:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110416134333.820103797@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110416132546.765212221@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-trace-balance_dirty_pages.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6733 bytes --]
It would be useful for analyzing the dynamics of the throttling
algorithms, and helpful for debugging user reported problems.
Here is an interesting test to verify the theory with balance_dirty_pages()
tracing. On a partition that can do ~60MB/s, a sparse file is created and
4 rsync tasks with different write bandwidth started:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/1T bs=1M count=1 seek=1024000
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/balance_dirty_pages/enable
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/a --bwlimit 10000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/A --bwlimit 10000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/b --bwlimit 20000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/c --bwlimit 30000&
Trace outputs (an old version) within 0.1 second, grouped by tasks:
rsync-3824 [004] 15002.076447: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=15% limit=130876 gap=5340 dirtied=192 pause=20
rsync-3822 [003] 15002.091701: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=15% limit=130777 gap=5113 dirtied=192 pause=20
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.004667: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% limit=129570 gap=3714 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.012654: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% limit=129589 gap=3733 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.021838: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% limit=129604 gap=3748 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [004] 15002.091193: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% limit=129583 gap=3983 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [004] 15002.102729: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% limit=129594 gap=3802 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [000] 15002.109252: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% limit=129619 gap=3827 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3823 [002] 15002.009029: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128762 gap=2842 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [002] 15002.021598: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128813 gap=3021 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.032973: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128805 gap=2885 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.048800: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128823 gap=2967 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.060728: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128821 gap=3221 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [000] 15002.073152: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128825 gap=3225 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [005] 15002.090111: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128782 gap=3214 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [004] 15002.102520: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128764 gap=3036 dirtied=64 pause=12
The data vividly show that
- the heaviest writer is throttled a bit (weight=39%)
- the lighter writers run at full speed (weight=15%,15%,30%)
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 20 +++++++
2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-04-16 11:28:27.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-04-16 11:28:28.000000000 +0800
@@ -197,6 +197,86 @@ TRACE_EVENT(dirty_ratelimit,
)
);
+TRACE_EVENT(balance_dirty_pages,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+ unsigned long thresh,
+ unsigned long dirty,
+ unsigned long bdi_dirty,
+ unsigned long base_bw,
+ unsigned long task_bw,
+ unsigned long dirtied,
+ unsigned long period,
+ long pause,
+ unsigned long start_time),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bdi, thresh, dirty, bdi_dirty,
+ base_bw, task_bw, dirtied, period, pause, start_time),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array( char, bdi, 32)
+ __field(unsigned long, limit)
+ __field(unsigned long, goal)
+ __field(unsigned long, dirty)
+ __field(unsigned long, bdi_goal)
+ __field(unsigned long, bdi_dirty)
+ __field(unsigned long, avg_dirty)
+ __field(unsigned long, base_bw)
+ __field(unsigned long, task_bw)
+ __field(unsigned int, dirtied)
+ __field(unsigned int, dirtied_pause)
+ __field(unsigned long, period)
+ __field( long, think)
+ __field( long, pause)
+ __field(unsigned long, paused)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ strlcpy(__entry->bdi, dev_name(bdi->dev), 32);
+
+ __entry->limit = default_backing_dev_info.dirty_threshold;
+ __entry->goal = thresh - thresh / DIRTY_SCOPE;
+ __entry->dirty = dirty;
+ __entry->bdi_goal = bdi->dirty_threshold -
+ bdi->dirty_threshold / DIRTY_SCOPE;
+ __entry->bdi_dirty = bdi_dirty;
+ __entry->avg_dirty = bdi->avg_dirty;
+ __entry->base_bw = KBps(base_bw);
+ __entry->task_bw = KBps(task_bw);
+ __entry->dirtied = dirtied;
+ __entry->dirtied_pause = current->nr_dirtied_pause;
+ __entry->think = current->paused_when == 0 ? 0 :
+ (long)(jiffies - current->paused_when) * 1000 / HZ;
+ __entry->period = period * 1000 / HZ;
+ __entry->pause = pause * 1000 / HZ;
+ __entry->paused = (jiffies - start_time) * 1000 / HZ;
+ ),
+
+
+ TP_printk("bdi %s: "
+ "limit=%lu goal=%lu dirty=%lu "
+ "bdi_goal=%lu bdi_dirty=%lu avg_dirty=%lu "
+ "base_bw=%lu task_bw=%lu "
+ "dirtied=%u dirtied_pause=%u "
+ "period=%lu think=%ld pause=%ld paused=%lu",
+ __entry->bdi,
+ __entry->limit,
+ __entry->goal,
+ __entry->dirty,
+ __entry->bdi_goal,
+ __entry->bdi_dirty,
+ __entry->avg_dirty,
+ __entry->base_bw, /* base throttle bandwidth */
+ __entry->task_bw, /* task throttle bandwidth */
+ __entry->dirtied,
+ __entry->dirtied_pause,
+ __entry->period, /* ms */
+ __entry->think, /* ms */
+ __entry->pause, /* ms */
+ __entry->paused /* ms */
+ )
+);
+
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_congest_waited_template,
TP_PROTO(unsigned int usec_timeout, unsigned int usec_delayed),
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-04-16 11:28:27.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-04-16 11:28:28.000000000 +0800
@@ -1163,6 +1163,16 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
* it may be a light dirtier.
*/
if (unlikely(-pause < HZ*10)) {
+ trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
+ dirty_thresh,
+ nr_dirty,
+ bdi_dirty,
+ base_bw,
+ bw,
+ pages_dirtied,
+ period,
+ pause,
+ start_time);
if (-pause > HZ/2) {
current->paused_when = now;
current->nr_dirtied = 0;
@@ -1176,6 +1186,16 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
pause = min(pause, pause_max);
pause:
+ trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
+ dirty_thresh,
+ nr_dirty,
+ bdi_dirty,
+ base_bw,
+ bw,
+ pages_dirtied,
+ period,
+ pause,
+ start_time);
current->paused_when = now;
__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
io_schedule_timeout(pause);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] writeback: trace balance_dirty_pages
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 21:25:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110416134333.820103797@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110416132546.765212221@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-trace-balance_dirty_pages.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7036 bytes --]
It would be useful for analyzing the dynamics of the throttling
algorithms, and helpful for debugging user reported problems.
Here is an interesting test to verify the theory with balance_dirty_pages()
tracing. On a partition that can do ~60MB/s, a sparse file is created and
4 rsync tasks with different write bandwidth started:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/1T bs=1M count=1 seek=1024000
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/balance_dirty_pages/enable
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/a --bwlimit 10000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/A --bwlimit 10000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/b --bwlimit 20000&
rsync localhost:/mnt/1T /mnt/c --bwlimit 30000&
Trace outputs (an old version) within 0.1 second, grouped by tasks:
rsync-3824 [004] 15002.076447: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=15% limit=130876 gap=5340 dirtied=192 pause=20
rsync-3822 [003] 15002.091701: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=15% limit=130777 gap=5113 dirtied=192 pause=20
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.004667: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% limit=129570 gap=3714 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.012654: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% limit=129589 gap=3733 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [006] 15002.021838: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=30% limit=129604 gap=3748 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [004] 15002.091193: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% limit=129583 gap=3983 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [004] 15002.102729: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% limit=129594 gap=3802 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3821 [000] 15002.109252: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=29% limit=129619 gap=3827 dirtied=64 pause=8
rsync-3823 [002] 15002.009029: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128762 gap=2842 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [002] 15002.021598: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128813 gap=3021 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.032973: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128805 gap=2885 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.048800: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128823 gap=2967 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [003] 15002.060728: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128821 gap=3221 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [000] 15002.073152: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128825 gap=3225 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [005] 15002.090111: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128782 gap=3214 dirtied=64 pause=12
rsync-3823 [004] 15002.102520: balance_dirty_pages: bdi=btrfs-2 weight=39% limit=128764 gap=3036 dirtied=64 pause=12
The data vividly show that
- the heaviest writer is throttled a bit (weight=39%)
- the lighter writers run at full speed (weight=15%,15%,30%)
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 20 +++++++
2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-04-16 11:28:27.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-04-16 11:28:28.000000000 +0800
@@ -197,6 +197,86 @@ TRACE_EVENT(dirty_ratelimit,
)
);
+TRACE_EVENT(balance_dirty_pages,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+ unsigned long thresh,
+ unsigned long dirty,
+ unsigned long bdi_dirty,
+ unsigned long base_bw,
+ unsigned long task_bw,
+ unsigned long dirtied,
+ unsigned long period,
+ long pause,
+ unsigned long start_time),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bdi, thresh, dirty, bdi_dirty,
+ base_bw, task_bw, dirtied, period, pause, start_time),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array( char, bdi, 32)
+ __field(unsigned long, limit)
+ __field(unsigned long, goal)
+ __field(unsigned long, dirty)
+ __field(unsigned long, bdi_goal)
+ __field(unsigned long, bdi_dirty)
+ __field(unsigned long, avg_dirty)
+ __field(unsigned long, base_bw)
+ __field(unsigned long, task_bw)
+ __field(unsigned int, dirtied)
+ __field(unsigned int, dirtied_pause)
+ __field(unsigned long, period)
+ __field( long, think)
+ __field( long, pause)
+ __field(unsigned long, paused)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ strlcpy(__entry->bdi, dev_name(bdi->dev), 32);
+
+ __entry->limit = default_backing_dev_info.dirty_threshold;
+ __entry->goal = thresh - thresh / DIRTY_SCOPE;
+ __entry->dirty = dirty;
+ __entry->bdi_goal = bdi->dirty_threshold -
+ bdi->dirty_threshold / DIRTY_SCOPE;
+ __entry->bdi_dirty = bdi_dirty;
+ __entry->avg_dirty = bdi->avg_dirty;
+ __entry->base_bw = KBps(base_bw);
+ __entry->task_bw = KBps(task_bw);
+ __entry->dirtied = dirtied;
+ __entry->dirtied_pause = current->nr_dirtied_pause;
+ __entry->think = current->paused_when == 0 ? 0 :
+ (long)(jiffies - current->paused_when) * 1000 / HZ;
+ __entry->period = period * 1000 / HZ;
+ __entry->pause = pause * 1000 / HZ;
+ __entry->paused = (jiffies - start_time) * 1000 / HZ;
+ ),
+
+
+ TP_printk("bdi %s: "
+ "limit=%lu goal=%lu dirty=%lu "
+ "bdi_goal=%lu bdi_dirty=%lu avg_dirty=%lu "
+ "base_bw=%lu task_bw=%lu "
+ "dirtied=%u dirtied_pause=%u "
+ "period=%lu think=%ld pause=%ld paused=%lu",
+ __entry->bdi,
+ __entry->limit,
+ __entry->goal,
+ __entry->dirty,
+ __entry->bdi_goal,
+ __entry->bdi_dirty,
+ __entry->avg_dirty,
+ __entry->base_bw, /* base throttle bandwidth */
+ __entry->task_bw, /* task throttle bandwidth */
+ __entry->dirtied,
+ __entry->dirtied_pause,
+ __entry->period, /* ms */
+ __entry->think, /* ms */
+ __entry->pause, /* ms */
+ __entry->paused /* ms */
+ )
+);
+
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_congest_waited_template,
TP_PROTO(unsigned int usec_timeout, unsigned int usec_delayed),
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-04-16 11:28:27.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-04-16 11:28:28.000000000 +0800
@@ -1163,6 +1163,16 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
* it may be a light dirtier.
*/
if (unlikely(-pause < HZ*10)) {
+ trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
+ dirty_thresh,
+ nr_dirty,
+ bdi_dirty,
+ base_bw,
+ bw,
+ pages_dirtied,
+ period,
+ pause,
+ start_time);
if (-pause > HZ/2) {
current->paused_when = now;
current->nr_dirtied = 0;
@@ -1176,6 +1186,16 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
pause = min(pause, pause_max);
pause:
+ trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
+ dirty_thresh,
+ nr_dirty,
+ bdi_dirty,
+ base_bw,
+ bw,
+ pages_dirtied,
+ period,
+ pause,
+ start_time);
current->paused_when = now;
__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
io_schedule_timeout(pause);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-16 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-16 13:25 [PATCH 00/12] IO-less dirty throttling v7 Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 01/12] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated written pages Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 02/12] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 03/12] writeback: bdi write bandwidth estimation Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 04/12] writeback: smoothed global/bdi dirty pages Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 05/12] writeback: smoothed dirty threshold and limit Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 06/12] writeback: enforce 1/4 gap between the dirty/background thresholds Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 07/12] writeback: base throttle bandwidth and position ratio Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 08/12] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] writeback: show bdi write bandwidth in debugfs Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 10/12] writeback: trace dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 11/12] writeback: trace balance_dirty_pages Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` [PATCH 12/12] writeback: trace global_dirty_state Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-16 16:27 ` [PATCH 00/12] IO-less dirty throttling v7 Sedat Dilek
2011-04-17 1:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-17 3:18 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-17 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-17 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-17 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-17 4:46 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-17 4:46 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-17 6:46 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-18 0:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-18 0:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-18 6:57 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-18 8:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-18 10:22 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-17 7:31 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-04-17 7:31 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-04-17 9:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-17 9:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-17 17:44 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-04-17 17:44 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-04-17 23:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-17 23:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-26 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-28 14:27 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-28 14:27 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110416134333.820103797@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.