All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Cc: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:05:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427220524.GQ2135@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110427213431.236c2a15@neptune.home>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> On Wed, 27 April 2011 Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > On 27/04/11 19:41, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 April 2011 Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:28:37 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > >>>>> Just in case, /proc/$(pidof rcu_kthread)/status shows ~20k voluntary
> > >>>>> context switches and exactly one non-voluntary one.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> In addition when rcu_kthread has stopped doing its work
> > >>>>> `swapoff $(swapdevice)` seems to block forever (at least normal shutdown
> > >>>>> blocks on disabling swap device).
> > > 
> > > Apparently it's not swapoff but `umount -a -t tmpfs` that's getting
> > > stuck here. Manual swapoff worked.

Doesn't "umount" wait for an RCU grace period?  If so, then your hang
is just a consequence of RCU grace periods hanging, which in turn appears
to be a consequence of rcu_kthread not being allowed to run.

> > Anything to do with this?
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/60953/
> 
> I don't think so, if it is, it is only loosely related.
> 
> From the trace you omitted to keep it's visible that it gets hit by
> non-operating RCU kthread.

Yep, makes sense!

							Thanx, Paul

> Maybe existence of RCU barrier in this trace has some relation to
> above thread but I don't see it at first glance.
> 
> [ 1714.960735] umount          D 5a000040  5668 20331  20324 0x00000000
> [ 1714.960735]  c3c99e5c 00000086 dd407900 5a000040 dd25a1a8 dd407900 dd25a120 c3c99e0c
> [ 1714.960735]  c3c99e24 c10c1be2 c14d9f20 c3c99e5c c3c8c680 c3c8c680 000000bb c3c99e24
> [ 1714.960735]  c10c0b88 dd25a120 dd407900 ddfd4b40 c3c99e4c ddfc9d20 dd402380 5a000010
> [ 1714.960735] Call Trace:
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c1be2>] ? check_object+0x92/0x210
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c0b88>] ? init_object+0x38/0x70
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c1be2>] ? check_object+0x92/0x210
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13cb37d>] schedule_timeout+0x16d/0x280
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c0b88>] ? init_object+0x38/0x70
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c2122>] ? free_debug_processing+0x112/0x1f0
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10a3791>] ? shmem_put_super+0x11/0x20
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13cae9c>] wait_for_common+0x9c/0x150
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c102c890>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x170/0x170
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13caff2>] wait_for_completion+0x12/0x20
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c1075ad7>] rcu_barrier_sched+0x47/0x50
>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c104d3c0>] ? alloc_pid+0x370/0x370
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10ce74a>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3a/0x60
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10ce948>] deactivate_super+0x48/0x70
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10e7427>] mntput_no_expire+0x87/0xe0
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10e7800>] sys_umount+0x60/0x320
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10b231a>] ? remove_vma+0x3a/0x50
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10b3b22>] ? do_munmap+0x212/0x2f0
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10e7ad9>] sys_oldumount+0x19/0x20
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13cce10>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26
> 
> Bruno

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Cc: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:05:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427220524.GQ2135@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110427213431.236c2a15@neptune.home>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> On Wed, 27 April 2011 Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > On 27/04/11 19:41, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 April 2011 Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:28:37 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > >>>>> Just in case, /proc/$(pidof rcu_kthread)/status shows ~20k voluntary
> > >>>>> context switches and exactly one non-voluntary one.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> In addition when rcu_kthread has stopped doing its work
> > >>>>> `swapoff $(swapdevice)` seems to block forever (at least normal shutdown
> > >>>>> blocks on disabling swap device).
> > > 
> > > Apparently it's not swapoff but `umount -a -t tmpfs` that's getting
> > > stuck here. Manual swapoff worked.

Doesn't "umount" wait for an RCU grace period?  If so, then your hang
is just a consequence of RCU grace periods hanging, which in turn appears
to be a consequence of rcu_kthread not being allowed to run.

> > Anything to do with this?
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/60953/
> 
> I don't think so, if it is, it is only loosely related.
> 
> From the trace you omitted to keep it's visible that it gets hit by
> non-operating RCU kthread.

Yep, makes sense!

							Thanx, Paul

> Maybe existence of RCU barrier in this trace has some relation to
> above thread but I don't see it at first glance.
> 
> [ 1714.960735] umount          D 5a000040  5668 20331  20324 0x00000000
> [ 1714.960735]  c3c99e5c 00000086 dd407900 5a000040 dd25a1a8 dd407900 dd25a120 c3c99e0c
> [ 1714.960735]  c3c99e24 c10c1be2 c14d9f20 c3c99e5c c3c8c680 c3c8c680 000000bb c3c99e24
> [ 1714.960735]  c10c0b88 dd25a120 dd407900 ddfd4b40 c3c99e4c ddfc9d20 dd402380 5a000010
> [ 1714.960735] Call Trace:
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c1be2>] ? check_object+0x92/0x210
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c0b88>] ? init_object+0x38/0x70
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c1be2>] ? check_object+0x92/0x210
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13cb37d>] schedule_timeout+0x16d/0x280
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c0b88>] ? init_object+0x38/0x70
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c2122>] ? free_debug_processing+0x112/0x1f0
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10a3791>] ? shmem_put_super+0x11/0x20
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13cae9c>] wait_for_common+0x9c/0x150
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c102c890>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x170/0x170
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13caff2>] wait_for_completion+0x12/0x20
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c1075ad7>] rcu_barrier_sched+0x47/0x50
>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c104d3c0>] ? alloc_pid+0x370/0x370
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10ce74a>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3a/0x60
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10ce948>] deactivate_super+0x48/0x70
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10e7427>] mntput_no_expire+0x87/0xe0
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10e7800>] sys_umount+0x60/0x320
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10b231a>] ? remove_vma+0x3a/0x50
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10b3b22>] ? do_munmap+0x212/0x2f0
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10e7ad9>] sys_oldumount+0x19/0x20
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13cce10>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26
> 
> Bruno

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Cc: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:05:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427220524.GQ2135@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110427213431.236c2a15@neptune.home>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Bruno Premont wrote:
> On Wed, 27 April 2011 Padraig Brady wrote:
> > On 27/04/11 19:41, Bruno Premont wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 April 2011 Bruno Premont wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:28:37 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Bruno Premont wrote:
> > >>>>> Just in case, /proc/$(pidof rcu_kthread)/status shows ~20k voluntary
> > >>>>> context switches and exactly one non-voluntary one.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> In addition when rcu_kthread has stopped doing its work
> > >>>>> `swapoff $(swapdevice)` seems to block forever (at least normal shutdown
> > >>>>> blocks on disabling swap device).
> > > 
> > > Apparently it's not swapoff but `umount -a -t tmpfs` that's getting
> > > stuck here. Manual swapoff worked.

Doesn't "umount" wait for an RCU grace period?  If so, then your hang
is just a consequence of RCU grace periods hanging, which in turn appears
to be a consequence of rcu_kthread not being allowed to run.

> > Anything to do with this?
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/60953/
> 
> I don't think so, if it is, it is only loosely related.
> 
> From the trace you omitted to keep it's visible that it gets hit by
> non-operating RCU kthread.

Yep, makes sense!

							Thanx, Paul

> Maybe existence of RCU barrier in this trace has some relation to
> above thread but I don't see it at first glance.
> 
> [ 1714.960735] umount          D 5a000040  5668 20331  20324 0x00000000
> [ 1714.960735]  c3c99e5c 00000086 dd407900 5a000040 dd25a1a8 dd407900 dd25a120 c3c99e0c
> [ 1714.960735]  c3c99e24 c10c1be2 c14d9f20 c3c99e5c c3c8c680 c3c8c680 000000bb c3c99e24
> [ 1714.960735]  c10c0b88 dd25a120 dd407900 ddfd4b40 c3c99e4c ddfc9d20 dd402380 5a000010
> [ 1714.960735] Call Trace:
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c1be2>] ? check_object+0x92/0x210
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c0b88>] ? init_object+0x38/0x70
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c1be2>] ? check_object+0x92/0x210
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13cb37d>] schedule_timeout+0x16d/0x280
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c0b88>] ? init_object+0x38/0x70
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10c2122>] ? free_debug_processing+0x112/0x1f0
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10a3791>] ? shmem_put_super+0x11/0x20
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13cae9c>] wait_for_common+0x9c/0x150
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c102c890>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x170/0x170
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13caff2>] wait_for_completion+0x12/0x20
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c1075ad7>] rcu_barrier_sched+0x47/0x50
>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c104d3c0>] ? alloc_pid+0x370/0x370
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10ce74a>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3a/0x60
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10ce948>] deactivate_super+0x48/0x70
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10e7427>] mntput_no_expire+0x87/0xe0
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10e7800>] sys_umount+0x60/0x320
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10b231a>] ? remove_vma+0x3a/0x50
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10b3b22>] ? do_munmap+0x212/0x2f0
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c10e7ad9>] sys_oldumount+0x19/0x20
> [ 1714.960735]  [<c13cce10>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26
> 
> Bruno

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-27 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 184+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-24 18:21 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression? Bruno Prémont
2011-04-24 21:59 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-24 21:59   ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-25  2:42     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-25  7:47     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-25  7:47       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-25  9:17       ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25  9:17         ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25  9:25         ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-25  9:25           ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-25 10:34           ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 10:34             ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 11:41             ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 11:41               ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 11:47               ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-25 11:47                 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-25 12:11                 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 12:11                   ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 12:14                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-25 12:14                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-25 12:21                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-25 12:21                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-25 15:22         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 15:22           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 16:04           ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 16:31             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 16:31               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:00               ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 17:10                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:10                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:20                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:20                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 18:36                   ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 18:36                     ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 19:16                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 19:16                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 19:16                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 21:10                       ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 21:26                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 21:26                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 21:30                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 21:30                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 21:49                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 21:49                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 21:49                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26  6:19                             ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-26  6:19                               ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-26 11:27                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 11:27                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 11:27                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 16:38                                 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-26 17:09                                   ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-26 17:09                                     ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-26 17:18                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 17:18                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 22:28                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-26 22:28                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-27  6:15                                         ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27  6:15                                           ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 18:41                                           ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 19:16                                             ` Pádraig Brady
2011-04-27 19:16                                               ` Pádraig Brady
2011-04-27 19:16                                               ` Pádraig Brady
2011-04-27 19:34                                               ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 19:34                                                 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 22:05                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-04-27 22:05                                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:05                                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 20:40                                             ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 20:40                                               ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 20:40                                               ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 22:07                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:07                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:07                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-28  6:10                                                 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28  6:10                                                   ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28  6:10                                                   ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 22:06                                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-27 22:06                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-27 22:27                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:27                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:32                                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-27 22:32                                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-27 22:59                                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:59                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:59                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 23:28                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-27 23:28                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-27 23:46                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-27 23:46                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-28  9:09                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28  9:09                                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28  9:17                                                 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28  9:17                                                   ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28  9:40                                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28  9:40                                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 10:12                                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-28 10:12                                                       ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-28 10:12                                                       ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-28  9:45                                                 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 10:26                                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-28 10:26                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-28 13:30                                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-28 13:30                                                       ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-28 15:28                                                       ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 15:44                                                         ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 15:44                                                           ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 15:48                                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-28 15:48                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-28 18:49                                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 18:49                                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 20:23                                                           ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28 20:29                                                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 20:29                                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 20:44                                                               ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28 20:44                                                                 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28 21:04                                                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 21:04                                                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 21:51                                                                   ` john stultz
2011-04-28 21:51                                                                     ` john stultz
2011-04-28 21:51                                                                     ` john stultz
2011-04-28 22:02                                                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 22:02                                                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 23:06                                                                       ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 23:06                                                                         ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 23:35                                                                         ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-29  0:42                                                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-29  0:42                                                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-29  0:42                                                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-29  9:34                                                                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29  9:34                                                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29  7:55                                                                       ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-29  7:55                                                                         ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-29 18:09                                                                       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-29 18:09                                                                         ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-29 18:26                                                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 18:26                                                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 19:31                                                                       ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-29 19:31                                                                         ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-29 20:10                                                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 20:10                                                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 20:14                                                                           ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-29 20:14                                                                             ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-30  9:14                                                                             ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-30  9:14                                                                               ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 20:41                                                           ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 19:22                                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-28 19:22                                                           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-27 21:55                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 21:55                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 21:55                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-28  6:22                                           ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28  6:22                                             ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28 10:26                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-28 10:26                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-28 10:26                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 17:12                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 17:12                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 17:12                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 18:50                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 18:50                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 19:17                                       ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-26 19:17                                         ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-27 22:02                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:02                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:02                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 22:08                         ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-25 22:08                           ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-25 17:29                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 17:29                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 17:29                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 18:13                   ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-25 18:13                     ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-25 18:28                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 18:28                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 18:28                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 17:26               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 17:26                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 17:26                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 10:28               ` Catalin Marinas
2011-04-27 10:28                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-04-25 17:51           ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-25 17:51             ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110427220524.GQ2135@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=P@draigBrady.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.