From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Status of arch/arm in linux-next
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:15:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110429201521.GC12256@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110426181508.GB1908@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Indeed. So in my opinion it makes sense to move code into the drivers
> > directory, at least the code that's going to be used by multiple platforms
> > (that need not be a complete driver).
>
> Ok, so my opinion on this has changed a little over the weekend.
> I don't totally hate it now, but I'm still not a huge fan.
> That said, I won't stand in the way if this is what everyone agrees is
> the way forward.
>
> in cpufreq.next I moved the x86 drivers over. Someone look it over ?
> If that looks like what you all had in mind, start sending me the patches
> for other arches, and I'll get them queued up for .40
FYI, this is now on the 'move-drivers' branch in cpufreq.git
Unless there's a good reason not to, I'm going to start pushing this to Linus
next merge window.
Dave
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: davej@redhat.com (Dave Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Status of arch/arm in linux-next
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:15:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110429201521.GC12256@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110426181508.GB1908@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Indeed. So in my opinion it makes sense to move code into the drivers
> > directory, at least the code that's going to be used by multiple platforms
> > (that need not be a complete driver).
>
> Ok, so my opinion on this has changed a little over the weekend.
> I don't totally hate it now, but I'm still not a huge fan.
> That said, I won't stand in the way if this is what everyone agrees is
> the way forward.
>
> in cpufreq.next I moved the x86 drivers over. Someone look it over ?
> If that looks like what you all had in mind, start sending me the patches
> for other arches, and I'll get them queued up for .40
FYI, this is now on the 'move-drivers' branch in cpufreq.git
Unless there's a good reason not to, I'm going to start pushing this to Linus
next merge window.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 9:44 Status of arch/arm in linux-next Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 11:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-14 12:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 12:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-14 14:20 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-14 14:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-14 14:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 18:32 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-15 15:12 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-15 15:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-15 16:10 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-16 8:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-16 16:57 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 8:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-18 13:57 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 14:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-18 14:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-18 15:58 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 15:58 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 17:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-18 20:23 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 21:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-18 23:55 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-14 14:07 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-15 2:59 ` Nico Erfurth
2011-04-15 8:21 ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-04-15 13:13 ` Nico Erfurth
2011-04-15 1:16 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-15 6:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-19 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 14:50 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-19 14:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 15:04 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-19 15:14 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-19 16:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 16:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 16:05 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-19 16:05 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-21 20:14 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-21 20:14 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-21 21:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-21 21:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-22 7:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-22 7:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-26 14:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-26 14:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-26 17:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-26 17:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-26 18:15 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-26 18:15 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-29 20:15 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2011-04-29 20:15 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-30 0:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-30 0:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-08-13 15:46 ` [BUG?] Moving drivers to drivers/cpufreq/ causes all to be loaded Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-13 19:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-13 21:11 ` Dave Jones
2011-08-14 0:18 ` Mattia Dongili
2011-08-14 0:18 ` Mattia Dongili
2011-08-14 17:01 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 17:17 ` Kay Sievers
2011-08-14 17:17 ` Kay Sievers
2011-05-01 23:02 ` Status of arch/arm in linux-next Jamie Lokier
2011-05-01 23:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-19 16:27 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-19 16:27 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-19 17:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 17:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-20 6:36 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 6:36 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-21 7:32 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-21 8:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-22 7:56 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-22 11:46 ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-02 13:49 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-05-02 19:21 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 7:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-20 7:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-15 14:30 ` Martin Guy
2011-04-15 15:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-18 15:17 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-04-18 16:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-18 21:54 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-04-19 15:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-19 15:20 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110429201521.GC12256@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.