[LARTC] Re: List fault?

[LARTC] Re: List fault?

[Michelle Konzack]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1433 bytes --]

Hello Grant Taylor,

Am 2011-05-04 14:24:17, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
> >I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
> >take over this one.
> 
> (I'll make this pitch again.)
> 
> Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
> so that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed
> back to the mailing list (as a discussion list)?

For WHAT?  Real MTAs have <L> byside <R> and <G>

> All in favor?
> Any one against?

Yes.

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
    Michelle Konzack

-- 
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
   Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux

itsystems@tdnet France EURL       itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle Konzack            Owner Michelle Konzack

Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz                 Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France           77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil         Tel: +49-177-9351947  mobil
                                  Tel: +49-176-86004575 office

<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/>  <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/>         <http://www.can4linux.org/>

Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ    #328449886

Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] Re: List fault?

[Don Gould]

I'm all for just seeing if we can get to the list admin and just get the 
existing list back up to scratch.

Who is the list admin?

Do we just need a new admin or supporter?  Has the existing person just 
got past being able to do the role (ie busy with work, family, what ever 
:) )

D
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[LARTC] Re: List fault?

[Simon Leinen]

> Hello Grant Taylor,
> Am 2011-05-04 14:24:17, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> (I'll make this pitch again.)
>> 
>> Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
>> so that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed
>> back to the mailing list (as a discussion list)?

> For WHAT?  Real MTAs have <L> byside <R> and <G>

I'm with Michelle on this one.  People are capable of choosing between
these ("r" and "f" in my case, or "Reply"/"Reply to all" on other
MUAs).

>> All in favor?
>> Any one against?

> Yes.

Count me in the "against" camp.

Best regards,
-- 
Simon.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[LARTC] Re: List fault?

[Benny Amorsen]

Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net> writes:

> Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
> so that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed back
> to the mailing list (as a discussion list)?

Yes. http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html

> All in favor?

No.

> Any one against?

Definitely.


/Benny


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] Re: List fault?

[Kilian Krause]

On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 00:12 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Grant Taylor,
> 
> Am 2011-05-04 14:24:17, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
> > >I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
> > >take over this one.
> > 
> > (I'll make this pitch again.)
> > 
> > Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
> > so that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed
> > back to the mailing list (as a discussion list)?
> 
> For WHAT?  Real MTAs have <L> byside <R> and <G>
> 
> > All in favor?
> > Any one against?
> 
> Yes.

Sorry guys, but I have to support Michelle here and refrain that anyone
not familiar with the "Reply-To" problem in the context of mailinglists
do a quick google on "Reply To munging". It's really just some ugly
workaround for old/broken MUA to set Reply-To for a mailinglist pointing
back to itself. 

Please don't!

-- 
Best regards,
Kilian

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc